IP Library Granted Patent US 11,593,767
Granted Patent B2
US 11,593,767 · App. 17/461,383 · Granted Feb 28, 2023

Systems and methods for providing electronic event attendance mode recommendations

Inventors: Pushkar Yashavant Deole (Pune, IN); Sandesh Chopdekar (Pune, IN); Navin Daga (Silapathar, IN)
Assignee: Avaya Management L.P.
G06Q10/1095G06F3/0482G06N3/02H04L12/1818
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,593,767
App. No.
17/461,383
Granted
Feb 28, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods include providing a recommendation for an attendance mode for a user to select when invited to an event through a calendaring application. Systems and methods include processing event and user data with a neural network configured to output a recommended attendance mode.

Claims (51)

1. A method of generating user-specific recommendations, the method comprising:

identifying an electronic invitation to an event;

determining a user associated with the electronic invitation;

performing an analysis of the event based on the user;

based on the analysis, determining a recommended attendance mode of a plurality of attendance modes, wherein the plurality of attendance modes comprise one or more of an in-person attendance, a remote attendance, a partial attendance, and a selective attendance; and

presenting the recommended attendance mode to the user.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analysis comprises identifying one or more invitees to the event.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising determining a relationship between the user and the one or more invitees.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analysis comprises identifying one or more topics associated with the event.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analysis comprises determining one or more other events are within a temporal proximity to the event.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analysis comprises inputting data associated with the event and data associated with the user into a neural network.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

determining the recommended attendance mode was accepted by the user; and

training the neural network based on the determination that the recommended attendance mode was accepted by the user.

8. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

determining the recommended attendance mode was not accepted by the user;

determining a different attendance mode was selected by the user; and

training the neural network based on the determination that the recommended attendance mode was not accepted by the user.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

receiving text comprising a reason provided by the user describing why the recommended attendance mode was or was not accepted;

analyzing the text comprising the reason; and

training the neural network based on the analysis of the text comprising the reason.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analysis comprises determining a number of users invited to the event.

11. A computer system comprising:

a processor; and

a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-readable instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to execute a method, the method comprising:

identifying an electronic invitation to an event;

determining a user associated with the electronic invitation;

performing an analysis of the event based on the user;

based on the analysis, determining a recommended attendance mode of a plurality of attendance modes, wherein the plurality of attendance modes comprise one or more of an in-person attendance, a remote attendance, a partial attendance, and a selective attendance; and

presenting the recommended attendance mode to the user.

12. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the analysis comprises identifying one or more invitees to the event.

13. The computer system of claim 12 , wherein the method further comprises determining a relationship between the user and the one or more invitees.

14. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the analysis comprises identifying one or more topics associated with the event.

15. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the analysis comprises determining one or more other events are within a temporal proximity to the event.

16. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the analysis comprises inputting data associated with the event and data associated with the user into a neural network.

17. The computer system of claim 16 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining the recommended attendance mode was accepted by the user; and

training the neural network based on the determination that the recommended attendance mode was accepted by the user.

18. The computer system of claim 16 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining the recommended attendance mode was not accepted by the user;

determining a different attendance mode was selected by the user; and

training the neural network based on the determination that the recommended attendance mode was not accepted by the user.

19. A computer program product comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code embodied therewith, the computer-readable program code configured, when executed by a processor of a first user device, to execute a method, the method comprising:

identifying an electronic invitation to an event;

determining a user associated with the electronic invitation;

performing an analysis of the event based on the user;

based on the analysis, determining a recommended attendance mode of a plurality of attendance modes, wherein the plurality of attendance modes comprise one or more of an in-person attendance, a remote attendance, a partial attendance, and a selective attendance; and

presenting the recommended attendance mode to the user.

20. The computer program product of claim 19 , wherein the analysis comprises identifying one or more invitees to the event.

Assignments (5)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 61087/0386) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063690/0359 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 4, 2023
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; INTELLISIST, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063542/0662 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 3, 2023
From: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; KNOAHSOFT INC.
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB [COLLATERAL AGENT]
Reel/Frame 063742/0001 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 5, 2022
From: AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 061087/0386 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2021
From: CHOPDEKAR, SANDESH; DEOLE, PUSHKAR YASHAVANT; DAGA, NAVIN
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.
Reel/Frame 057330/0934 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 17220485 · Apr 1, 2021
Related Publication 20220327494A1 · Oct 13, 2022