IP Library Granted Patent US 12,632,745
Granted Patent B2
US 12,632,745 · App. 17/952,978 · Granted May 19, 2026

Computer-implemented system and method for building context models in real time

Inventor: Simon Tucker (Oakland, CA)
Assignee: Genesee Valley Innovations, LLC
G06N5/022G06N5/025G06Q10/0639G06Q30/0201G06Q30/0202
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,632,745
App. No.
17/952,978
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented system and method for building context models in real time is provided. A contextual situation of a user is determined and compared with models each associated with actions that represent a situation. A determination is made that none of the models represents the situation of the user. A similarity value is determined for each of at least a portion of the models with the situation of the user. A threshold is applied to the similarity values. All models associated with a similarity value that satisfies the threshold are selected. The selected models are merged into a new model for the situation by utilizing a weight associated with each of the selected models to identify those actions in the selected models for inclusion in the new model.

Claims (43)

1 . A computer-implemented system for building context models in real time, comprising:

a database of models for a user, wherein each model comprises actions that represent a different situation;

a server comprising a central processing unit, memory, an input port to receive the models from the database, and an output port, wherein the central processing unit is configured to:

determine a contextual situation of a user;

compare the situation with models each comprising actions that represent a different situation;

determine that none of the models represents the situation of the user;

determine a similarity value for each of at least a portion of the models with the situation of the user;

apply a threshold to the similarity values;

select all models associated with a similarity value that satisfies the threshold;

generate a new model for the situation, to add to the database, by utilizing a weight associated with each of the selected models that carries over to the actions in that model to identify those actions in the selected models for inclusion in the new model; and

select one or more of the actions of the new model for recommended performance by the user.

2 . A system according to claim 1 , wherein the central processing unit collects the contextual data of the user to determine the situation.

3 . A system according to claim 2 , wherein the contextual data is collected via one or more of a cell phone, smart watch, head mounted computing device, and tablet.

4 . A system according to claim 2 , wherein the contextual data comprises one or more of location, time, temperature, acceleration, vital statistics, inventory, movement data, email, text messages, video, and voice recordings.

5 . A system according to claim 2 , wherein the contextual data is collected continuously, periodically, or randomly.

6 . A system according to claim 1 , wherein the central processing unit recommends during the situation the selected actions from the new model to the user.

7 . A system according to claim 6 , wherein the central processing unit selects the actions for recommendation by identifying those actions as most popular or most consistently performed across all the merged models.

8 . A system according to claim 6 , wherein the weight of each table is considered for each action in that table for selecting the one or more actions for recommendation.

9 . A system according to claim 1 , wherein the central processing unit stores the actions of each model in a different table and combines the actions of the new model into a single table.

10 . A system according to claim 9 , wherein the central processing unit represents each table of actions as nodes and edges.

11 . A computer-implemented method for building context models in real time, comprising:

determining a contextual situation of a user;

comparing the situation with models each comprising actions that represent a different situation;

determining that none of the models represents the situation of the user;

determining a similarity value for each of at least a portion of the models with the situation of the user;

applying a threshold to the similarity values;

selecting all models associated with a similarity value that satisfies the threshold;

generating a new model for the situation, to add to the database, by utilizing a weight associated with each of the selected models that carries over to the actions in that model to identify those actions in the selected models for inclusion in the new model; and

selecting one or more of the actions of the new model for recommended performance by the user.

12 . A method according to claim 11 , further comprising:

collecting the contextual data of the user to determine the situation.

13 . A method according to claim 12 , wherein the contextual data is collected via one or more of a cell phone, smart watch, head mounted computing device, and tablet.

14 . A method according to claim 12 , wherein the contextual data comprises one or more of location, time, temperature, acceleration, vital statistics, inventory, movement data, email, text messages, video, and voice recordings.

15 . A method according to claim 12 , wherein the contextual data is collected continuously, periodically, or randomly.

16 . A method according to claim 11 , further comprising:

recommending during the situation the selected actions from the new model to the user.

17 . A method according to claim 16 , wherein the selected actions are identified as most popular or most consistently performed across all the selected models.

18 . A method according to claim 16 , wherein the weight of each model is considered for each action in that table for selecting the one or more actions for recommendation.

19 . A method according to claim 11 , further comprising:

storing the actions of each model in a different table; and

combining the actions of the new model into a single table.

20 . A method according to claim 19 , further comprising:

representing each table of actions as nodes and edges.

Assignments (7)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 31, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 073225/0116 →
SECOND LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 2, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 071785/0550 →
FIRST LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 11, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070824/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066741/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 065628/0019 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVAL OF US PATENTS 9356603, 10026651, 10626048 AND INCLUSION OF US PATENT 7167871 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 064038 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 28, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064161/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 20, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064038/0001 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15233881 · Aug 10, 2016
Related Publication 20230017581A1 · Jan 19, 2023
References Cited (63)
US 7139757B1 · Apollonsky et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8001512B1 · White · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8055546B1 · Cassone et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8209331B1 · Garg et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9218819B1 · Stekkelpak et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9372555B2 · Abbott et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10096055B2 · Ryu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11080336B2 · Van Dusen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11455545B2 · Tucker · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20060010206A1 · Apacible · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060287920A1 · Perkins et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080228685A1 · Shivaji-Rao et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090141940A1 · Zhao · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090186635A1 · Vieri · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090210373A1 · Yu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110125678A1 · Partridge · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110301777A1 · Cox et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120108172A1 · Bullen · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120150874A1 · Sweeney et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130054512A1 · Ephrat · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130238535A1 · Eppanen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130268767A1 · Schrecker · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130311924A1 · Denker · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140032572A1 · Eustice et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140055610A1 · Ko et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140129560A1 · Grokop et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140229498A1 · Dillon et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140280138A1 · Li et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140297248A1 · Li et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150058320A1 · Zheng et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150170033A1 · Rhee et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150317582A1 · Nath et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160062985A1 · Epstein et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160065519A1 · Waltermann · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160099970A1 · Grodzicki · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160109861A1 · Kim et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160300049A1 · Guedalia · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160357774A1 · Gauci et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160360382A1 · Gross et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160371591A1 · Reddy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170032263A1 · Yuan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170039305A1 · Shakarian et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170048664A1 · Zhang · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170169715A1 · Alyuz Civitci et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180046922A1 · Tucker · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180292797A1 · Lamparter et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20230017581A1 · Tucker · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230306284A1 · Tappin · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240037417A1 · Cheng · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240241752A1 · Crabtree · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Otebolaku, A.M. et al. (2014). “Context-Aware Media Recommendations.” 2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops. IEEE. DOI:10.1109/WAINA.2014.40 (Year: 2014). [cited by applicant]
Reichardt, D. (Sep. 1995). “A Real-Time Approach to Traffic Situation Representation From Image Processing Data.” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '95. Symposium. IEEE. DOI:10.1109/IVS.1995.528332 (Year: 1995). [cited by applicant]
Bouneffouf, D. et al. (2012). “Following the User's Interests in Mobile Context-Aware Recommender Systems: The Hybrid-and-Greedy Algortihm.” 2012 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Appl… [cited by applicant]
Gross, T. et al. (2004). “Modelling Shared Contexts in Cooperative Environments: Concept, Implementation, and Evaluation.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 13: 283-303, 2004. (Year: 2004). [cited by applicant]
Adomavicius, G. et al. (2005). “Incorporating Contextual Information in Recommender Systems Using a Multidimentional Approach.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 23, No. 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 103-145. (Year: 200… [cited by applicant]
Kundu, S. et al. (2012). “A Ubiquitous Image Tagging System Using User Context.” 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE. DOI:10.1109/WI-IAT.2012.249 (Year:… [cited by applicant]
O'Reilly, R.C. et al. (2014). “Goal-Driven Congnition in the Brain: a Computational Framework.” arXiv:1404.7591v1 [q-bio.NC] (Year: 2014). [cited by applicant]
Bailey, C. et al. (2002). “Link augmentation: a context-based approach to support adaptive hypermedia.” Workshop on adaptive hypermedia. Springer, Berlin, Heldelberg, Aug. 2001j. OHS/SC/AH 2001, LNCX 2266, pp. 239-251, … [cited by applicant]
Vasudevan, C. (1994). “An experience-based approach to software project management.” Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Tools with Artifiical Intelligence. TAI 94. IEEE. Nov. 1994. DOI:10.1109/TAI.1994.346435… [cited by applicant]
Rao, A.S.P. et al. (2011). “Secured Agile Architecture for Context Aware Pervasive Computing”. (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies. vol. 2(2), 2011, 711-716. ISSN:0975-9646 (Y… [cited by applicant]
Zurn. J.B. et al. (2012). “Self-reproduction for articulated behaviors with dual humanoid robots using on-line decision tree classification.” Robotica 30.2 (2012): 315-332. doi:10.1017/S0263574711000580 (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
Alhamid, M.F. et al. (2015). “Towards context-aware media recommendation based on social tagging.” J Intell Inf Syst (2016) 46: 499-516. DOI 10.1007/s10844-015-0364-5 (Year: 2015). [cited by applicant]
Segev, A. et al. (2009). “Context-Based Matching and Ranking of Web Services for Composition.” IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul.-Sep. 2009. (Year: 2009). [cited by applicant]