IP Library Granted Patent US 12,366,678
Granted Patent B2
US 12,366,678 · App. 18/224,023 · Granted Jul 22, 2025

Estimating soil properties within a field using hyperspectral remote sensing

Inventors: Nick Cisek (San Francisco, CA); Nick Koshnick (San Francisco, CA); Haitao Xiang (Chesterfield, MO); Xianyuan Yang (Pleasanton, CA)
Assignee: CLIMATE LLC
G01V20/00A01B76/00G01N21/31G01N21/359G01N33/0098G01N33/24G01W1/10G06F30/27G06Q10/04A01B79/005G01N2021/1793G01N2021/3155G01N2201/0616G01N2201/129G06F2111/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,366,678
App. No.
18/224,023
Granted
Jul 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method is provided for determining soil properties for an area of land, from soil spectrum data. In an embodiment, the method includes receiving soil spectrum data records from hyperspectral sensors that represent a mean soil spectrum of a specific geo-location of the area of land and removing interference signals from the spectrum data records to create soil spectral bands. The method also includes predicting a plurality of soil property datasets based on a partial least-square regression and the soil spectral bands and selecting specific soil property datasets from the plurality of soil property datasets to represent soil properties of the specific geo-location, wherein the specific soil property datasets include property data and spectral band data for spectral bands used to determine the property data. The specific soil property datasets may then be used to generate a crop prescription of recommended hybrid seeds or population densities for the specific geo-location.

Claims (48)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, by a server computer system, one or more soil spectrum data records from hyperspectral sensors that represent a mean soil spectrum of a specific geo-location of a specified area of land;

removing, by the server computer system, interference signals from the one or more soil spectrum data records to create one or more soil spectral bands, wherein the removing includes one or more of data smoothing, application of spectral derivatives, standard normal variate preprocessing, and converting spectral reflectance to absorbance;

selecting, by the server computer system, a subset of the one or more soil spectral bands;

calculating, by the server computer system, a partial least-square regression between a first matrix and a second matrix, the first matrix including an eigen-decomposition of the subset of the one or more soil spectral bands of the one or more soil spectrum data records, the second matrix including soil property values;

predicting, by the server computer system, a plurality of soil property datasets based on the partial least-square regression;

selecting, by the server computer system, one or more specific soil property datasets from the plurality of soil property datasets to represent soil properties of the specific geo-location, based on a quality score, wherein the one or more specific soil property datasets include property data and spectral band data for spectral bands used to determine the property data; and

transmitting, by the server computer system, the one or more specific soil property datasets to a soil database repository for generating a crop prescription that includes a recommended hybrid seed line or population density for the specific geo-location of the area of land.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein predicting the plurality of soil property datasets includes:

determining, by the server computer system, one or more latent variables from the partial least-square regression; and

predicting values of the plurality of soil property datasets further based on the one or more latent variables.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the partial least-square regression includes:

X=TP T +E

Y=UQ T +F

U=TB,

wherein X is the first matrix; wherein Y is the second matrix; wherein P and Q are loading matrices; wherein B is a regression coefficient; wherein E and F are residual matrices; and wherein T and U are matrices including datasets of potential latent variables.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the hyperspectral sensors are affixed to aerial equipment, and wherein receiving the one or more soil spectrum data records includes receiving the one or more soil spectrum data records from the hyperspectral sensors affixed to the aerial equipment.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the hyperspectral sensors are affixed to movable or stationary land equipment, and wherein receiving the one or more soil spectrum data records includes receiving the one or more soil spectrum data records from the hyperspectral sensors that are affixed to the movable or stationary land equipment.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein removing the interference signals further comprises calculating a set of moving averages from one or more subsets of the one or more soil spectrum data records, wherein each moving average is a sum of a subset of adjacent soil spectrum records multiplied by a calculated convolution coefficient.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein removing the interference signals further comprises calculating a derivative of each moving average over a specified band distance.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein predicting the plurality of soil property datasets comprises:

receiving soil property data based upon one or more ground soil samples from one or more locations identified within the specific geo-location; and

wherein the one or more locations are determined using spatial sampling of the one or more soil spectral bands.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the interference signals include at least one of a baseline drift effect, particle deviation, and/or surface heterogeneity.

10. One or more non-transitory storage media comprising executable instructions which, when executed by one or more computing devices, cause the one or more computing devices to perform steps of:

receiving one or more soil spectrum data records from hyperspectral sensors that represent a mean soil spectrum of a specific geo-location of a specified area of land;

removing interference signals from the one or more soil spectrum data records to create one or more soil spectral bands, wherein the removing includes one or more of data smoothing, application of spectral derivatives, standard normal variate preprocessing, and converting spectral reflectance to absorbance;

selecting a subset of the one or more soil spectral bands;

calculating a partial least-square regression between a first matrix and a second matrix, the first matrix including an eigen-decomposition of the subset of the one or more soil spectral bands of the one or more soil spectrum data records, the second matrix including soil property values;

predicting a plurality of soil property datasets based on the partial least-square regression;

selecting one or more specific soil property datasets from the plurality of soil property datasets to represent soil properties of the specific geo-location, based on a quality score, wherein the one or more specific soil property datasets include property data and spectral band data for spectral bands used to determine the property data; and

transmitting the one or more specific soil property datasets to a soil database repository for generating a crop prescription that includes a recommended hybrid seed line or population density.

11. The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 10 , wherein predicting the plurality of soil property datasets includes:

determining one or more latent variables from the partial least-square regression; and

predicting values of the plurality of soil property datasets further based on the one or more latent variables.

12. The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 10 , wherein the partial least-square regression includes:

X=TP T +E

Y=UQ T +F

U=TB,

wherein X is the first matrix; wherein Y is the second matrix; wherein P and Q are loading matrices; wherein B is a regression coefficient; wherein E and F are residual matrices; and wherein T and U are matrices including datasets of potential latent variables.

13. The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 10 , wherein the hyperspectral sensors are affixed to aerial equipment, and wherein receiving the one or more soil spectrum data records includes receiving the one or more soil spectrum data records from the hyperspectral sensors that are affixed to the aerial equipment.

14. The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 10 , wherein the hyperspectral sensors are affixed to movable or stationary land equipment, and wherein receiving the one or more soil spectrum data records includes receiving the one or more soil spectrum data records from the hyperspectral sensors that are affixed to the movable or stationary land equipment.

15. The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 10 , wherein removing the interference signals comprises calculating a set of moving averages from one or more subsets of the one or more soil spectrum data records, wherein each moving average is a sum of a subset of adjacent soil spectrum records multiplied by a calculated convolution coefficient.

16. The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 15 , wherein removing the interference signals further comprises calculating a derivative of each moving average over a specified band distance.

17. The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 10 , wherein predicting the plurality of soil property datasets comprises:

receiving soil property data based upon one or more ground soil samples from one or more locations identified within the specific geo-location; and

wherein the one or more locations are determined using spatial sampling of the one or more soil spectral bands.

18. The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 10 , wherein the interference signals include at least one of a baseline drift effect, particle deviation, and/or surface heterogeneity.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2026
From: CLIMATE LLC
To: MONSANTO COMPANY
Reel/Frame 075177/0751 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2026
From: MONSANTO COMPANY
To: MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
Reel/Frame 075177/0908 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 18, 2023
From: THE CLIMATE CORPORATION
To: CLIMATE LLC
Reel/Frame 066059/0758 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2023
From: XIANG, HAITAO; YANG, XIANYUAN; KOSHNICK, NICK; CISEK, NICK
To: THE CLIMATE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 065884/0290 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17243447 · Apr 28, 2021
Continuation 16921489 · Jul 6, 2020
Continuation 16456883 · Jun 28, 2019
Continuation 14866160 · Sep 25, 2015
Related Publication 20230367032A1 · Nov 16, 2023
References Cited (71)
US 4492111A · Kirkland · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 5668719A · Bobrov · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5796932A · Fox · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6422508B1 · Barnes · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6608672B1 · Shibusawa · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6853937B2 · Shibusawa · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6937939B1 · Shibusawa · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 8426211B1 · Sridhar · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8655601B1 · Sridhar · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8737694B2 · Bredehoft · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9076118B1 · Mewes · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 11714211B2 · Xiang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20020133505A1 · Kuji · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020183867A1 · Gupta · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050027572A1 · Goshert · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050234691A1 · Singh · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060004907A1 · Pape · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060167926A1 · Verhey · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070085673A1 · Krumm · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080287662A1 · Wiesman · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100155156A1 · Finkelstein · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110106451A1 · Christy · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110137456A1 · Koselka · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120016517A1 · Holland · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120083907A1 · Motavalli · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120101861A1 · Lindores · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130018586A1 · Peterson · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130174040A1 · Johnson · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130144827A1 · Trevino · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130173321A1 · Johnson · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130322025A1 · Friedberg · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130332205A1 · Friedberg · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140012504A1 · Ben-Dor · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140012732A1 · Lindores · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140067745A1 · Avey et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140089045A1 · Johnson · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140358486A1 · Osborne · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150026023A1 · Sirota · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150095001A1 · Massonnat · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150237796A1 · Celli · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150370935A1 · Starr · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160078375A1 · Ethington · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160078569A1 · Ethington · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160078570A1 · Ethington · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160169855A1 · Baity · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170122889A1 · Weindorf · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190317243A1 · Xiang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200183867A1 · Ender · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200281133A1 · Rowan · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200337212A1 · Xiang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
AU 201632863B2 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 103941254 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
EP 2196085 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO200904834 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010128864 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011064445 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014036281 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014146719 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Ali, et al., “Modeling Managed Grassland Biomass Estimation by Using Multitemporal Remote Sensing Data—A Machine Learning Approach”, IEEE 2016 JSTARS, vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 3254-3264, 16pgs. [cited by applicant]
Ben-Dor E. et al., “Mapping of Several Soil Properties Using DAIS-7915 Hyperspectral Scanner Data—A Case Study Over Clayey Soils in Israel”, vol. 23 No. 6 dated Jan. 25, 2002, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Anderson K. et al., “Remote Sensing of Soil Surface Properties”, Process in Physical Geography: An International Review of Geo-graphical Work in the Natural and Env. Sciences vol. 33, Aug. 6, 2009, 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Shi T. et al., “Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy, An Alternative for Monitoring Soil Contamination by Heavy Me”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 265, Dec. 7, 2013, 12pgs. [cited by applicant]
Malapela, E-agriculture, “Can Artificial Intelligence Help Improve Agricultural Productivity?” Dec. 19, 2017, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Liebig et al., “Greenhouse Gas and Mitigation Potential of Agri cultural Practices in Northwestern USA and Western Canada”, Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 83, Issue 1, dated Aug. 2005, pp. 25-52. 28pgs. [cited by applicant]
Khedo et al., “PotatoSense: A Wireless Sensor Network System for Precision Agriculture” IST-Africa 2014 Conf Proceedings, IIMC International Information Management Corporation, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Henderson, Gary, Verification of Long-Term Pavement Performance Virtual Weather Stations: Phase I Report-Accuracy and Reliability of Virtual Weather Stations, dated May 2006, 94 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ge Y. et al., “Remote Sensing of Soil Properties in Precision Agriculture: A Review”, Frontiers of Earth Science; selected Publications from Chinese Universities, vol. 5 No. 3, Jun. 21, 2011, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fox G. A, et al. “Soil Property Analysis Using Principal Components Analysis, Soil Line, and Regression Models”, Soil Science Society of America, vol. 69, dated Nov. 1, 2005, pp. 1782-1788. [cited by applicant]
E-Agriculture, “Can Artificial Intelligence Help Improve Agricultural Productivity”, dated Dec. 19, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Brown C. D. et al., “Derivative Preprocessing and Optimal Corrections for Baseline Drift in Multivariate Calibration”, Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 54, No. 7, dated Jul. 1, 2000, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Iftkhar et al., Modeling Managed Grassland Biomass Estimation by Using Multiemporal Remote Sensing Data-A Machine Leaming Approach, IEEE, dated 2016, vol. 10. No. 7, pp. 3254-3264. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (2)
US 12,529,809 US 12,599,058