IP Library Granted Patent US 12,613,982
Granted Patent B2
US 12,613,982 · App. 18/501,895 · Granted Apr 28, 2026

Techniques to process three-dimensional object files while maintaining privacy

Inventors: Shantanu Rane (Palo Alto, CA); Alejandro E. Brito (Mountain View, CA); Morad Behandish (San Mateo, CA)
Assignee: Genesee Valley Innovations, LLC
G06F21/602B33Y50/00H04L9/008H04L9/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,613,982
App. No.
18/501,895
Granted
Apr 28, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides techniques for processing a three-dimensional (3D) object file in a privacy-preserving manner. An example method includes obtaining an object file that comprises a specification of a 3D printable object, encrypting the object file using a public key to generate an encrypted object file, and sending, to a remote computing system, the encrypted object file and a request to process the encrypted object file to identify a characteristic of the 3D printable object. The method also includes receiving an encrypted result file from the remote computing system, wherein the encrypted result file comprises an encrypted Minkowski sum of the encrypted object file and an encrypted comparison file. The method also includes decrypting the encrypted result file using a private key corresponding with the public key to generate an unencrypted result file and processing the unencrypted result file to determine the characteristic of the 3D printable object.

Claims (40)

1 . A method of processing a three-dimensional (3D) object file in a privacy-preserving manner, comprising:

obtaining an object file that comprises a specification of a 3D printable object;

encrypting the object file using a public key to generate an encrypted object file;

sending, by a processing device to a remote computing system, the encrypted object file and a request to process the encrypted object file to identify a characteristic of the 3D printable object;

receiving an encrypted result file from the remote computing system, wherein the encrypted result file comprises an encrypted Minkowski sum of the encrypted object file and an encrypted comparison file;

decrypting the encrypted result file using a private key corresponding with the public key to generate an unencrypted result file; and

processing the unencrypted result file to determine the characteristic of the 3D printable object.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein encrypting the object file comprises encrypting the object file using homomorphic encryption.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising converting the object file to a frequency domain representation before encrypting the object file.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein processing the unencrypted result file comprises converting the unencrypted result file to a spatial domain representation.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising sending the public key to a third-party computing device, wherein the encrypted comparison file is received by the remote computing system from the third-party computing device.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising sending the public key to the remote computing system, wherein the encrypted comparison file is generated by the remote computing system by encrypting a comparison file received from a local storage device of the remote computing system.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the object file comprises obtaining an object model and converting the object model to an equivalent tensor representation to generate the object file.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the encrypted result file is an encrypted element-wise product of the encrypted object file and the encrypted comparison file.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the encrypted comparison file is an encrypted 3D array of voxels that represents a smallest printable feature, and the characteristic identifies features of the 3D printable object that are smaller than the smallest printable feature.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the encrypted comparison file is an encrypted 3D array of voxels that represents a specification of a tool, and the characteristic identifies external regions of the 3D printable object that are accessible by the tool.

11 . A system for processing a three-dimensional (3D) object file in a privacy-preserving manner, comprising:

a memory;

a processing device operatively coupled to the memory, the processing device to:

obtain an object file that comprises a specification of a 3D printable object;

encrypt the object file using a public key to generate an encrypted object file;

send, to a remote computing system, the encrypted object file and a request to process the encrypted object file to identify a characteristic of the 3D printable object;

receive an encrypted result file from the remote computing system, wherein the encrypted result file comprises an encrypted Minkowski sum of the encrypted object file and an encrypted comparison file;

decrypt the encrypted result file using a private key corresponding with the public key to generate an unencrypted result file; and

process the unencrypted result file to determine the characteristic of the 3D printable object.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the processing device is further to convert the object file to a frequency domain representation before encryption of the object file.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the processing device is further to send the public key to a third-party computing device, wherein the encrypted comparison file is received by the remote computing system from the third-party computing device.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the processing device is further to send the public key to the remote computing system, wherein the encrypted comparison file is generated by the remote computing system by encryption of a comparison file received from a local storage device of the remote computing system.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein to obtain the object file, the processing device is to obtain an object model and convert the object model to an equivalent tensor representation to generate the object file.

16 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processing device, cause the processing device to:

obtain an object file that comprises a specification of a 3D printable object;

encrypt the object file using a public key to generate an encrypted object file;

send, by the processing device to a remote computing system, the encrypted object file and a request to process the encrypted object file to identify a characteristic of the 3D printable object;

receive an encrypted result file from the remote computing system, wherein the encrypted result file comprises an encrypted Minkowski sum of the encrypted object file and an encrypted comparison file;

decrypt the encrypted result file using a private key corresponding with the public key to generate an unencrypted result file; and

process the unencrypted result file to determine the characteristic of the 3D printable object.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions further direct the processing device to convert the object file to a frequency domain representation before encryption of the object file.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions further direct the processing device to send the public key to a third-party computing device, wherein the encrypted comparison file is received by the remote computing system from the third-party computing device.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions further direct the processing device to send the public key to the remote computing system, wherein the encrypted comparison file is generated by the remote computing system by encryption of a comparison file received from a local storage device of the remote computing system.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein to obtain the object file, the instructions direct the processing device is to obtain an object model and convert the object model to an equivalent tensor representation to generate the object file.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 31, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 073225/0116 →
SECOND LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 2, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 071785/0550 →
FIRST LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 11, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070824/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2024
From: RANE, SHANTANU; BRITO, ALEJANDRO E.; BEHANDISH, MORAD
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068411/0242 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066741/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 065628/0019 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250148090A1 · May 8, 2025
References Cited (9)
US 20110087350A1 · Fogel · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20150269290A1 · Nelaturi · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170279783A1 · Milazzo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180178451A1 · Gosch · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20220113689A1 · Behandish · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220129556A1 · Chen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220366406A1 · Perez · 2022 [cited by examiner]
EP Search report in corresponding EP application EP 24 20 5927.7 dated Mar. 3, 2025 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Behandish, M., et al., “Automated Process Planning for Hybrid Manufacturing,” Computer-Aided Design (CAD) , Special Issue on SPM'2018. DOI: 10.1016/ j.cad.2018.04.022, May 18, 2018, XP080879601 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]