IP Library Granted Patent US 12,400,264
Granted Patent B2
US 12,400,264 · App. 18/512,774 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

System and method for aggressively trading a strategy in an electronic trading environment

Inventors: Nicholas G. Kontos (Peoria, IL); Sagy Pundak Mintz (Tampa, FL); Alexander D. Deitz (New York, NY)
Assignee: TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
G06Q40/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,400,264
App. No.
18/512,774
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

System and method for aggressively trading a spread trading strategy in an electronic environment are provided herein. According to the example embodiments, a trader may configure the automated trading tool to trade as aggressively as possible by leaning on a price without an associated quantity. This allows a trader to possibly obtain a more profitable price as well as get filled faster. Traders submit an order for a spread and the automated trading tool calculates the quote order price based on a defined level of aggressiveness, the leaned on price, and the desired spread price. Based on the level of defined aggressiveness and the gap in the market, the automated trading tool may lean on a mildly, moderately, or extremely aggressive price.

Claims (26)

1. A system comprising:

a memory storing machine-readable instructions for an automated trading tool; and a processor that accesses the memory and executes the machine-readable instructions, wherein execution of the machine-readable instructions for the automated trading tool causes the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising:

receiving a desired strategy price for a trading strategy including a first tradeable object and a second tradeable object;

receiving first market information for the first tradeable object from a first electronic exchange over a network and second market information for the second tradeable object from a second electronic exchange over the network, wherein the first market information includes a first inside market for the first tradeable object, wherein the second market information includes a second inside market for the second tradeable object, wherein the first inside market includes a best bid and a best ask for the first tradeable object, wherein the second inside market includes a best bid and a best ask for the second tradeable object;

determining whether the first inside market for the first tradeable object includes a market gap between the best bid and the best ask for the first tradeable object, wherein the market gap includes a plurality of price levels between the best bid and the best ask for the first tradeable object without an available quantity;

determining a leaned-on price at a selected price level of the plurality of price levels within the market gap,

wherein the selected price level of the leaned-on price within the market gap is determined based on a level of quoting aggressiveness,

wherein the selected price level is at least one price level above the best bid price for the first tradeable object when the first tradeable object would be bought according to the trading strategy,

wherein the selected price level is at least one price level below the best ask for the first tradeable object when the first tradeable object would be sold according to the trading strategy;

dynamically modifying the level of quoting aggressiveness based on at least any one of trading volume, market activity, a trader's historical trading activity, and current trading activity;

calculating a quote order price for a quote order for the second tradeable object of the trading strategy based on the leaned-on price associated with the selected price level and the desired strategy price;

automatically submitting the quote order for the second tradeable object at the calculated quote order price to the second electronic exchange over the network; and

submitting, in response to receiving an indication that at least a portion of the quote order was filled, an offsetting hedge order for the first tradeable object to the first electronic exchange over the network.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the selected price level is one price level above the best bid for the first tradeable object when the first tradeable object would be bought according to the trading strategy, wherein the selected price level is one price level below the best ask for the first tradeable object when the first tradeable object would be sold according to the trading strategy.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the selected price level is two price levels above the best bid for the first tradeable object when the first tradeable object would be bought according to the trading strategy, wherein the selected price level is two price levels below the best ask for the first tradeable object when the first tradeable object would be sold according to the trading strategy.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the level of quoting aggressiveness includes a user-selected level of quoting aggressiveness.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the operations for the automated trading tool further comprise:

receiving a selected of the level of quoting aggressiveness from a plurality of levels of aggressiveness.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the operations for the automated trading tool further comprise:

adjusting the leaned-on price based on the level of quoting aggressiveness and the market gap.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein adjusting the leaned-on price is in response to a market fluctuation in the first market information for the first tradeable object.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the operations for the automated trading tool further comprise:

re-pricing the quote order based on the adjusted leaned-on price.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the quote order is a limit order.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first exchange is the same as the second exchange.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first exchange is different than the second exchange.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2025
From: TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
To: HPS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073510/0758 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2025
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 073470/0597 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2024
From: TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 067310/0496 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 17, 2023
From: KONTOS, NICHOLAS G.; MINTZ, SAGY P.; DEITZ, ALEXANDER D.
To: TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 065603/0534 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 17844122 · Jun 20, 2022
Continuation 17125854 · Dec 17, 2020
Continuation 16213528 · Dec 7, 2018
Continuation 13933262 · Jul 2, 2013
Continuation 13553397 · Jul 19, 2012
Continuation 12128382 · May 28, 2008
Related Publication 20240087023A1 · Mar 14, 2024
References Cited (74)
US 6098051A · Lupien et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7113924B2 · Fishbain · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7437325B2 · Kemp, II et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7496531B1 · Gastineau · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7542937B1 · Cohen · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7565313B2 · Waelbroeck et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7577600B1 · Zagara et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7613647B1 · Cushing et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7620588B1 · Duquette · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7644030B2 · Burns et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7672896B2 · Burns et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7680722B2 · Bok et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7689499B1 · Duquette · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7734532B2 · Fishbain · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7774261B1 · Mintz et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7774262B1 · Mintz et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7904370B2 · Singer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7904371B2 · Davidowitz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7974906B2 · Madhavan et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8140423B2 · Hansen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8244621B1 · Swearingen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8249977B2 · Kontos et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8510212B2 · Kontos et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8583536B1 · Deitz et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 10181157B2 · Kontos et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10903516B2 · Kontos et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20010032162A1 · Alsberg et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20010042040A1 · Keith · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020007335A1 · Millard et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020116317A1 · May · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030004852A1 · Burns · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030177126A1 · Weingard et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030233306A1 · Madhavan et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030236737A1 · Kemp, II et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040034591A1 · Waelbroeck et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040177024A1 · Bok et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040193526A1 · Singer et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040267655A1 · Davidowitz et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050154668A1 · Burns et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050171889A1 · Daley · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050240510A1 · Schweickert et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060020536A1 · Renton et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060036532A1 · Silverman et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060059077A1 · Goodman · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060129473A1 · Hansen et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060224492A1 · Pinkava · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060265309A1 · Sweeting et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060287944A1 · Fishbain · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070016506A1 · Davies et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070078749A1 · Burns · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070078752A1 · Burns et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070260559A1 · Ginsberg · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070265953A1 · Cunningham et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070276748A1 · Shapiro et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080021809A1 · Waelbroeck · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080243709A1 · Mintz et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090018944A1 · De Verdier · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299890A1 · Kontos et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090327153A1 · Milne · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20120284170A1 · Kontos et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140172665A1 · Kontos et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20190108590A1 · Kontos et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210103987A1 · Kontos et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CA 2448974A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
EP 1081614A2 · 2001 [cited by examiner]
EP 1507225A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 9114231A1 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006127415A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008110783A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009146363A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
Bushee et al: “Factors Affecting the Implementability of Stock Market Trading Strategies”, S&P Global, Market Intelligence, Wharton , University of Pennsylvania Apr. 14, 2003 (Year: 2003). [cited by examiner]
Lin, et al.: “Loss Protection in Pairs Trading Through Minimum Profit Bounds: a Cointegration Approach”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, vol. 2006, Article ID73803, … [cited by applicant]
Stoll, Hans R., “Electronic Trading in Stock Markets”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20, No. 1, Winter 2006, pp. 153-174; found on the internet Oct. 16, 2023 @ https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0895330… [cited by applicant]
Nevmyvaka, et al.: “Electronic trading in order-driven markets: efficient execution”, Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-commerce Technology (Year: 2005); found on the internet Oct. 16, 2023 @ https://www.resear… [cited by applicant]