IP Library Patent Application 18720529
Patent Application
App. No. 18/720,529

POWDER DEGRADATIONS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
18/720,529
Abstract

Examples of methods are described. In some examples, a method includes determining objects corresponding to a manufacturing period of three dimensional (3D) printing. In some examples, the method includes packing build volumes based on the objects. In some examples, the method includes simulating manufacturing powder degradation based on the build volumes. In some examples, the method includes determining a quantity of manufacturing powder consumption based on the manufacturing powder degradation. In some examples, the method includes adjusting a manufacturing parameter based on the quantity of manufacturing powder consumption.

Claims (38)

1 . A method, comprising:

determining objects corresponding to a manufacturing period of three dimensional (3D) printing;

packing build volumes based on the objects;

simulating manufacturing powder degradation based on the build volumes;

determining a quantity of manufacturing powder consumption based on the manufacturing powder degradation; and

adjusting a manufacturing parameter based on the quantity of manufacturing powder consumption.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the objects comprises selecting the objects based on object category.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a quantity of build volumes.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the quantity of build volumes is based on a quantity of object packing amounts, quantity of object spacings, and a quantity of replicants.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the quantity of manufacturing powder consumption per object for each of the build volumes;

selecting a build volume with a smallest quantity of manufacturing powder consumption per object; and wherein

adjusting the manufacturing parameter comprises changing a batching rule based on the selected build volume.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining whether a demand condition is satisfied.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein determining the objects corresponding to the manufacturing period is performed in response to determining that the demand condition is satisfied.

8 . The method of claim 6 , wherein determining whether the demand condition is satisfied comprises:

determining a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between a first period distribution and a second period distribution; and

comparing the KL divergence to a threshold.

9 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the determining whether the demand condition is satisfied comprises determining whether a quality metric satisfies a quality check threshold.

10 . An apparatus, comprising:

a memory; and

a processor coupled to the memory, wherein the processor is to:

simulate manufacturing powder degradation quality metrics for a set of build volumes;

determine quantities of manufacturing powder consumption for the set of build volumes based on the manufacturing powder degradation quality metrics;

select a build volume with a smallest quantity of manufacturing powder consumption; and

change a manufacturing procedure based on the selected build volume.

11 . The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the processor is to change the manufacturing procedure by changing a batching rule based on the selected build volume.

12 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the processor is to change the manufacturing procedure by changing a build height rule based on the selected build volume.

13 . A non-transitory tangible computer-readable medium comprising instructions when executed cause a processor of an electronic device to:

determine that a demand condition is satisfied to produce a demand determination;

determine, in response to the demand determination, objects corresponding to a manufacturing period;

determine build volumes that include the objects;

determine a quantity of manufacturing powder consumption for each of the build volumes; and

adjust a batching rule based on the quantity of manufacturing powder consumption of each of the build volumes.

14 . The non-transitory tangible computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the instructions when executed cause the processor of the electronic device to:

determine a build volume with a smallest manufacturing powder consumption; and

adjust the batching rule by changing the batching rule to a batch size of the build volume.

15 . The non-transitory tangible computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the instructions when executed cause the processor of the electronic device to determine that the demand condition is satisfied by comparing a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to a threshold.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2025
From: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
To: PERIDOT PRINT LLC
Reel/Frame 070187/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 8, 2024
From: WRIGHT, JACOB TYLER; KOTHARI, SUNIL; LEYVA MENDIVIL, MARIA FABIOLA; ZENG, JUN
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 067929/0880 →