IP Library Granted Patent US 7,647,062
Granted Patent B2
US 7,647,062 · App. 09/909,039 · Granted Jan 12, 2010

Control of transmission power in a radio system

Assignee: Nokia Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,647,062
App. No.
09/909,039
Granted
Jan 12, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a method for controlling transmission power in a radio system, preferably in a radio link system. To establish a power control mechanism which is capable of taking into account the various phenomena affecting the performance of the radio connection and which can also respond to degrading signal quality before bit errors begin to occur, pseudo errors, i.e. decision-making instants at which a symbol error nearly occurred, are monitored at the receiving end. The transmission power is then decreased when the rate of the pseudo errors is below a predetermined threshold and increased when pseudo errors occur so that a predetermined criterion is fulfilled.

Claims (110)

1. A method, comprising:

transmitting a digital signal from a transmitting end to a receiving end of a radio system;

receiving said digital signal at the receiving end;

setting an initial value of transmission power so that no pseudo errors are detected, wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur;

monitoring pseudo error occurrence in the received digital signal at the receiving end;

decreasing the transmission power gradually from the initial value at the transmission end when the pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception does not fulfill a predetermined condition; and

increasing the transmission power by a predetermined amount when the pseudo error occurrence in the error-free reception fulfills the predetermined condition.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

fulfilling the predetermined condition by detecting the pseudo error.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

fulfilling the predetermined condition by detecting a second pseudo error within a predetermined time interval after the last pseudo error.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

fulfilling the predetermined condition by detecting a predetermined number of pseudo errors within a predetermined time interval.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

increasing the transmission power immediately when the pseudo error is detected.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the decreasing the transmission power comprises decreasing the transmission power in predetermined steps for a predetermined time period at each step.

7. The method as claimed in claim 6 , further comprising:

configuring the predetermined step to be 1 dB.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

adjusting the transmission power after the set-up of the radio system to the initial value high enough so that no pseudo errors are detected at the receiving end;

decreasing the transmission power until a first pseudo error is detected;

increasing the transmission power in response to the detected pseudo error; and

jumping to the decreasing the transmission power until the first pseudo error is detected when no pseudo errors are detected during a predetermined time period after the transmission power has been increased in the increasing the transmission power in response to the detected error.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

configuring the predetermined amount for the increasing the transmission power to be 1 or 2 dB.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

using forward error correction in the transmitted signal;

decoding the digital signal at the receiving end using a forward error correction decoder; and

interpreting the corrections made by the forward error correction decoder as pseudo errors.

11. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

using, at the receiving end, a demodulator provided with a first set of thresholds for making a decision on a received symbol and a second set of thresholds for making a decision on whether the pseudo error has occurred.

12. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

monitoring the rate of actual errors at the receiving end; and

increasing the transmission power temporarily to the maximum transmission power when a predetermined error rate threshold is exceeded.

13. A system, comprising:

at a receiving end, a controller configured to monitor pseudo error occurrence in a received signal and to produce a control signal indicating when pseudo errors are detected and when the pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception is below a predetermined condition, wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur, and

at a transmitting end, an adjuster configured to adjust transmission power responsive to said control signal by decreasing the transmission power when the pseudo error occurrence in the error-free reception does not fulfill the predetermined condition and by increasing the transmission power when the pseudo error occurrence fulfills the predetermined condition.

14. The system as claimed in claim 13 , wherein said controller includes a forward error correction decoder configured to decode a forward error correction coded signal and configured to detect pseudo errors.

15. The system as claimed in claim 13 , wherein said controller includes a demodulator provided with a first set of thresholds for making a decision on a received symbol and a second set of thresholds for making a decision on whether the pseudo error has occurred.

16. An apparatus, comprising:

a receiver, configured to

monitor pseudo error occurrence in a received signal,

produce a control signal indicating when pseudo errors are detected and when the pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception is below a predetermined condition, and

wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur.

17. An apparatus, comprising:

a power controller configured to adjust transmission power responsive to a control signal,

wherein the control signal is configured to indicate when pseudo errors are detected in a receiver and when pseudo error occurrence in the receiver is below a predetermined condition for an error-free reception,

wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right, bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur, and

wherein the radio transmitter is configured to adjust transmission power by decreasing the transmission power when the pseudo error occurrence does not fulfill the predetermined condition and by increasing the transmission power when the pseudo error occurrence fulfills the predetermined condition.

18. An apparatus, comprising:

a controller configured to

set an initial value of transmission power so that no pseudo errors are detected in a received signal in a receiving end of a radio link system, wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur; and

adjust the transmission power responsive to a power control message received in the controller by decreasing the transmission power when pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception does not fulfill a predetermined condition and by increasing the transmission power when the pseudo error occurrence fulfills the predetermined condition, wherein the power control message is based on information on pseudo errors detected in the received signal in the receiving end and provides indication whether pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception fulfills the predetermined condition.

19. An apparatus, comprising:

a controller, configured to produce and send a power control message based on information on pseudo errors detected in a received signal and indicating whether pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception fulfills a predetermined condition, and

wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur.

20. A method, comprising:

sending, via an electronic transmitter, a digital signal;

setting an initial value of transmission power so that no pseudo errors are detected in a received signal in a receiving end of a radio link system, wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur;

receiving a power control message, which is based on information on pseudo errors detected in the received digital signal in the receiving end and indicating whether pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception is below a predetermined condition;

decreasing the transmission power from the initial value when the pseudo error occurrence in the error-free reception does not fulfill the predetermined condition; and

increasing the transmission power when the pseudo error occurrence fulfills the predetermined condition.

21. A method, comprising:

receiving, via an electronic receiver, a digital signal;

monitoring pseudo error occurrence in the received digital signal, wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur;

producing a power control message based on information on pseudo errors detected in the received digital signal and indicating whether pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception fulfills a predetermined condition; and

sending the power control message to a transmitting end of a radio link system.

22. An apparatus, comprising:

a transmitter first output configured to output a corrected bit stream, wherein the corrected bit stream is obtained by removing redundancy from a received bit stream; and

an error transmitter configured to output an error signal indicating corrections made by the apparatus to obtain the corrected bit stream, wherein the error signal provides information for producing a control signal, the control signal indicating whether pseudo errors are detected in a received signal and whether the pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception fulfills a predetermined condition, wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur.

23. A method, comprising:

transmitting a digital signal from a transmitting end to a receiving end of a radio system;

receiving said digital signal at the receiving end;

setting an initial value of the transmission power so that no pseudo errors are detected, wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur;

monitoring pseudo error occurrence in the received digital signal at the receiving end;

decreasing the transmission power gradually from the initial value at the transmission end when the pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception does not fulfill a predetermined condition;

increasing the transmission power by a predetermined amount when the pseudo error occurrence in the error-free reception fulfills the predetermined condition;

monitoring occurrence of actual errors in the received digital signal at the receiving end; and

overriding transmission power control based on monitoring of occurrence of pseudo errors by increasing transmission power when actual errors are observed.

24. A system, comprising:

at a receiving end, monitoring means for monitoring pseudo error occurrence in a received signal and producing a control signal indicating when pseudo errors are detected and when the pseudo error occurrence in an error-free reception is below a predetermined condition, wherein a pseudo error is defined as an instant when a right bit or symbol decision was made, but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision was smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur, and

at a transmitting end, adjusting means for adjusting transmission power responsive to said control signal by decreasing the transmission power when the pseudo error occurrence in the error-free reception does not fulfill the predetermined condition and by increasing the transmission power when the pseudo error occurrence fulfills the predetermined condition.

25. An apparatus, comprising:

a controller configured to monitor the occurrence of pseudo errors in transmissions received from a transmitting end, a pseudo error defining an instant when a right bit or symbol decision is made but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision is smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur, and to produce a control signal indicating whether a pseudo error has been detected, and

a generator configured to generate power control messages based on control signals received from said controller, which power control messages are to be transmitted to said transmitting end, and wherein the power control messages are generated such that transmission power at said transmitting end is decreased until the pseudo error occurrence is above a predetermined level, and is increased when the pseudo error occurrence is above the predetermined level.

26. An apparatus as claimed in claim 25 , wherein said controller includes a forward error correction decoder configured to decode a forward error correction coded signal and to detect pseudo errors.

27. An apparatus as claimed in claim 25 , wherein said controller includes a demodulator provided with a first set of thresholds for making a decision on a received symbol and a second set of thresholds for making a decision on whether a pseudo error has occurred.

28. An apparatus as claimed in claim 25 , wherein the predetermined level is the detection of a pseudo error.

29. An apparatus as claimed in claim 25 , wherein the predetermined level comprises detecting a second pseudo error within a predetermined time interval after detection of a first pseudo error.

30. An apparatus as claimed in claim 25 , wherein the predetermined level comprises detecting a predetermined number of pseudo errors within a predetermined time interval.

31. A method, comprising:

monitoring the occurrence of pseudo errors in transmissions received from a transmitting end, a pseudo error defining an instant when a right bit or symbol decision is made but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision is smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur, and producing a control signal indicating whether a pseudo error has been detected; and

generating power control messages based on control signals received, which power control messages are for transmitting to said transmitting end, and wherein the power control messages are generated such that transmission power at said transmitting end is decreased until the pseudo error occurrence is above a predetermined level, and is increased when the pseudo error occurrence is above the predetermined level.

32. A method as claimed in claim 31 , wherein the predetermined level is the detection of a pseudo error.

33. A method as claimed in claim 31 , wherein the predetermined level comprises detecting a second pseudo error within a predetermined time interval after detection of a first pseudo error.

34. A method as claimed in claim 31 , wherein the predetermined level comprises detecting a predetermined number of pseudo errors within a predetermined time interval.

35. An apparatus, comprising:

a controller configured to control transmission power at a transmitting end based on power control messages,

wherein the power control messages are generated based on control signals indicating whether a pseudo error has been detected in transmissions received from the transmitting end at a receiving end, a pseudo error defining an instant when a right bit or symbol decision is made but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision is smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur, and

wherein the power control messages are generated such that transmission power at said transmitting end is decreased until the pseudo error occurrence is above a predetermined level, and is increased when the pseudo error occurrence is above the predetermined level.

36. An apparatus as claimed in claim 35 , wherein the predetermined level is the detection of a pseudo error.

37. An apparatus as claimed in claim 35 , wherein the predetermined level comprises detecting a second pseudo error within a predetermined time interval after detection of a first pseudo error.

38. An apparatus as claimed in claim 35 , wherein the predetermined level comprises detecting a predetermined number of pseudo errors within a predetermined time interval.

39. A method, comprising:

controlling transmission power at a transmitting end based on power control messages,

wherein the power control messages are generated based on control signals indicating whether a pseudo error has been detected in transmissions received from the transmitting end at a receiving end, a pseudo error defining an instant when a right bit or symbol decision is made but a margin for the right bit or symbol decision is smaller than a limit value so that an actual error did not occur; and

wherein the power control messages are generated such that transmission power at said transmitting end is decreased until the pseudo error occurrence is above a predetermined level, and is increased when the pseudo error occurrence is above the predetermined level.

40. A method as claimed in claim 39 , wherein the predetermined level is the detection of a pseudo error.

41. A method as claimed in claim 39 , wherein the predetermined level comprises detecting a second pseudo error within a predetermined time interval after detection of a first pseudo error.

42. A method as claimed in claim 39 , wherein the predetermined level comprises detecting a predetermined number of pseudo errors within a predetermined time interval.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 3, 2021
From: TERRIER SSC, LLC
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056526/0093 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OT WSOU TERRIER HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056990/0081 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2019
From: OCO OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, L.P. (F/K/A OMEGA CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND LP
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 049246/0405 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2019
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: BP FUNDING TRUST, SERIES SPL-VI
Reel/Frame 049235/0068 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 25, 2017
From: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 043953/0822 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2017
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OMEGA CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, LP
Reel/Frame 043966/0574 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2015
From: NOKIA CORPORATION
To: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
Reel/Frame 035796/0819 →
MERGER Recorded Jun 5, 2015
From: NOKIA NETWORKS OY
To: NOKIA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 035842/0359 →
MERGER Recorded Jun 4, 2015
From: NOKIA NETWORKS OY
To: NOKIA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 035789/0917 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 31, 2001
From: MAKINEN, JARMO; RAHKALA, JARI
To: NOKIA NETWORKS OY
Reel/Frame 012408/0268 →
Priority Claims (1)
FI 990095 · Jan 19, 1999 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTFI000003800 · Jan 18, 2000
Related Publication 20020045460A1 · Apr 18, 2002