IP Library Granted Patent US 7,025,425
Granted Patent B2
US 7,025,425 · App. 10/240,228 · Granted Apr 11, 2006

Method, system, and computer program product for the evaluation of glycemic control in diabetes from self-monitoring data

Assignee: University of Virginia Patent Foundation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,025,425
App. No.
10/240,228
Granted
Apr 11, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, system, and computer program product related to the diagnosis of diabetes, and is directed to predicting the long-term risk of hyperglycemia, and the long-term and short-term risks of severe hypoglycemia in diabetics, based on blood glucose readings collected by a self-monitoring blood glucose device. The method, system, and computer program product pertain directly to the enhancement of existing home blood glucose monitoring devices, by introducing an intelligent data interpretation component capable of predicting both HbA 1c and periods of increased risk of hypoglycemia, and to the enhancement of emerging continuous monitoring devices by the same features. With these predictions the diabetic can take steps to prevent the adverse consequences associated with hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia.

Claims (139)

1. A computerized method for evaluating the HbA 1c of a patient based on blood glucose (BG) data collected over a predetermined duration, said method comprising:

computing weighted deviation toward high blood glucose (WR) and estimated rate of change of blood glucose (Dr) based on said collected BG data; and

estimating HbA 1c using a predetermined mathematical formula based on said computed WR and Dr.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

said computed WR is mathematically defined from a series of BG readings x 1 , x 2 , . . . x n taken at time points t 1 , t 2 , . . . , t n as:

WR

=

1

n

i

=

1

n

w

r

(

x

i

;

1

)

where:

wr(BG;b)=10f(BG) b if f(BG)>0 and 0 otherwise,

b=1, representing a weighting parameter, and

said computed Dr is mathematically defined as:

Dr=average of s k+1 −s k ,

where:

s k =10S(k+t 1 ) 2 for k=0, 1, . . . , t n −t 1 ,

S(t j )=f(x j ), for j=1, . . . , n.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said estimate of HbA 1c from said BG monitoring data is mathematically defined as:

Estimated HbA 1c =0.9008(WR)−0.89207(Dr)+6.7489.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

defining predetermined categories for the estimate of HbA 1c , each of said HbA 1c estimate categories representing a range of values for estimated HbA 1c ; and

assigning said estimated HbA 1c to at least one of said HbA 1c estimate categories.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein said HbA 1c estimate categories are defined as follows:

classified category 1, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is less than about 7.8;

classified category 2, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 7.8 and about 8.5;

classified category 3, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 8.5 and about 9.0;

classified category 4, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 9.0 and about 9.6;

classified category 5, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 9.6 and about 10.3;

classified category 6, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 10.3 and about 11.0; and

classified category 7, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is above about 11.0.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

defining predicted confidence intervals for corresponding said HbA 1c estimate categories, wherein said predicted confidence intervals are defined as follows:

said classified category 1 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c less than about 8.0;

said classified category 2 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 8.0 and about 8.5;

said classified category 3 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 8.5 and about 9.0;

said classified category 4 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 9.0 and about 9.5;

said classified category 5 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 9.5 and about 10.1;

said classified category 6 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 10.1 and about 11.0; and

said classified category 7 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c above about 11.0.

7. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

defining predicted confidence intervals for corresponding said HbA 1c , each of said predicted confidence intervals representing a range of values for HbA 1c .

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein said predicted HbA 1c confidence intervals have about a 95% confidence level.

9. A computerized method for evaluating the HbA 1c of a patient based on blood glucose (BG) data collected over a predetermined duration, said method comprising:

computing weighted deviation toward high blood glucose (WR) and estimated rate of change of blood glucose (Dr) based on said collected BG data;

estimating HbA 1c using a predetermined mathematical formula based on said computed WR and Dr; and

providing a predetermined confidence interval for classification of said estimated value of HbA 1c .

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein:

said confidence interval is between about 85% to about 95%.

11. A system for evaluating HbA 1c of a patient based on blood glucose (BG) data collected over a predetermined duration, said system comprising:

a database component operative to maintain a database identifying said BG data;

a processor programmed to:

compute weighted deviation toward high blood glucose (WR) and estimated rate of change of blood glucose (Dr) based on said collected BG data; and

estimate HbA 1c using a predetermined mathematical formula based on said computed WR and Dr.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein:

said computed WR is mathematically defined from a series of BG readings x 1 , x 2 , . . . x n taken at time points t 1 , t 2 , . . . , t n as:

WR

=

1

n

i

=

1

n

w

r

(

x

i

;

1

)

where:

wr(BG;b)=10f(BG) b if f(BG)>0 and 0 otherwise,

b=1, representing a weighting parameter, and

said computed Dr is mathematically defined as:

Dr=average of s k+1 −s k ,

where:

s k =10S(k+t 1 ) 2 for k=0, 1, . . . , t n −t 1 ,

S(t j )=f(x j ), for j=1, . . . , n.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein said the estimate of HbA 1c from said BG monitoring data is mathematically defined as:

Estimated HbA 1c =0.9008(WR)−0.8207(Dr)+6.7489.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein said processor is further programmed to:

define predetermined categories for the estimate of HbA 1c , each of said HbA 1c estimate categories representing a range of values for estimated HbA 1c ; and

assign said estimated HbA 1c to at least one of said HbA 1c estimate categories.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein said HbA 1c estimate categories are defined as follows:

classified category 1, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is less than about 7.8;

classified category 2, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 7.8 and about 8.5;

classified category 3, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 8.5 and about 9.0;

classified category 4, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 9.0 and about 9.6;

classified category 5, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 9.6 and about 10.3;

classified category 6, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is between about 10.3 and about 11.0; and

classified category 7, wherein said estimated HbA 1c is above about 11.0.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein said processor is further programmed to:

define predicted confidence intervals for corresponding said HbA 1c estimate categories, wherein said predicted confidence intervals are defined as follows:

said classified category 1 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c less than about 8.0;

said classified category 2 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 8.0 and about 8.5;

said classified category 3 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 8.5 and about 9.0;

said classified category 4 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 9.0 and about 9.5;

said classified category 5 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 9.5 and about 10.1;

said classified category 6 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c between about 10.1 and about 11.0; and

said classified category 7 corresponds with a predicted HbA 1c above about 11.0.

17. The system of claim 14 , wherein said processor is further programmed to:

define predicted confidence intervals for corresponding said HbA 1c , each of said predicted confidence intervals representing a range of values for HbA 1c .

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein said predicted HbA 1c confidence intervals have about a 95% confidence level.

19. A glycemic control system for evaluating HbA 1c of a patient, said system comprising:

a blood glucose (BG) acquisition mechanism, said acquisition mechanism configured to acquire BG data from the patient,

a database component operative to maintain a database identifying said BG data;

a processor programmed to:

compute weighted deviation toward high blood glucose (WR) and estimated rate of change of blood glucose (Dr) based on said collected BG data; and

estimate HbA 1c using a predetermined mathematical formula based on said computed WR and Dr.

20. A computer program product comprising a computer useable medium having computer program logic for enabling at least one processor in a computer system to evaluate HbA 1c of a patient based on blood glucose (BG) data, said computer program logic comprising:

computing weighted deviation toward high blood glucose (WR) and estimated rate of change of blood glucose (Dr) based on said collected BG data; and

estimating HbA 1c using a predetermined mathematical formula based on said computed WR and Dr.

21. The computer program product of claim 20 , wherein said computer program logic further comprises:

providing a predetermined confidence interval for classification of said estimated value of HbA 1c , wherein said confidence interval is a single value or a range of values.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2018
From: KOVATCHEV, BORIS P; COX, DANIEL J
To: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
Reel/Frame 046534/0986 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2018
From: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
To: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 046535/0120 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jan 14, 2010
From: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 023783/0166 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2002
From: VIRGINIA, UNIVERSITY OF
To: VIRGINIA, UNIVERSITY OF PATENT FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 013797/0799 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 6019303700 · Mar 29, 2000
Related Publication 20030212317A1 · Nov 13, 2003