IP Library › Granted Patent US 6,845,818
Granted Patent B2
US 6,845,818 · App. 10/425,512 · Granted Jan 25, 2005

Method of freeing stuck drill pipe

Assignee: Shell Oil Company
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,845,818
App. No.
10/425,512
Granted
Jan 25, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is an auxiliary method for freeing a drill pipe stuck due to build up of filter cake, which provides a reduction in the amount of force required to free said pipe which comprises: a) Lowering an ultrasonic horn type device down the drill pipe to the point of contact between said drill pipe and mud filter cake; b) Producing ultrasonic energy at the point of contact until the contact area is sufficiently reduced such that substantially less force is required to free the pipe.

Claims (11)

1. In any method of freeing a drill pipe stuck due to build up of filter cake, the auxiliary method which provides a reduction in the amount of force required to free said pipe, which comprises:

a) lowering an ultrasonic horn down the drill pipe to a point of contact between said drill pipe and filter cake;

b) applying ultrasonic energy at the point of contact until the contact area is sufficiently reduced that substantially less force is required to free the pipe.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the pipe is differentially stuck.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising the ultrasonic energy is applied at the point of contact so that at least one ultrasonic wave is directed substantially perpendicular to the filter cake.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the ultrasonic energy is applied at a varying frequency in the range of 20 kHz to 40 kHz.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the ultrasonic energy is appied at a varying frequency in the range of about 20±5 kHz.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the ultrasonic energy is applied at a fixed frequency of about 20 KHz.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the ultrasonic energy is applied in a power amplitude in the range of 50 wafts to 450 watts.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the ultrasonic energy is applied in a power amplitude in the range of 100 watts to 250 watts.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the ultrasonic energy is applied in a power amplitude is less than 200 watts.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 24, 2003
From: TUTNCU, AZRA NUR; HALE, ARTHUR HERMAN
To: SHELL OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 014308/0586 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20040216880A1 · Nov 4, 2004