IP Library Granted Patent US 7,231,945
Granted Patent B2
US 7,231,945 · App. 10/539,964 · Granted Jun 19, 2007

Method of proof testing glass

Assignee: Zogenix, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,231,945
App. No.
10/539,964
Granted
Jun 19, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of proof testing glass containers is disclosed. The method involves applying pressure to a sealed container in two discrete stages as shown in FIG. 1 . In the first stage, the pressure is increased to a peak over at a first rate. In the second stage, the pressure is reduced to zero at a much greater rate.

Claims (24)

1. A method of testing the strength of a glass container, comprising pressurizing the container, the container failing the test if it breaks,

wherein the container is pressurized to be subjected to a pressure profile which in a first stage increases from a starting pressure to a peak pressure at a first average rate of pressure increase, and which in a second stage decreases from the peak pressure to the starting pressure at a second, greater, average rate of pressure decrease, wherein the first stage of the pressure profile involved ramping the pressure substantially linearly to the peak pressure.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the second stage of the pressure profile involves reducing the pressure substantially instantaneously to the starting pressure.

3. A method as claimed claim in claim 2 , wherein the starting pressure is atmospheric pressure.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein pressurizing the container comprises filling the container with a liquid and pressurizing the liquid.

5. A method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein the pressure is applied by first sealing the container and applying the pressure hydrostatically using the liquid.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the water is used to apply the pressure hydrostatically.

7. A method as claimed in 5 or 6 , wherein the container seal is applied using an o-ring which seals under hydrostatic pressure.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the pressure is released in the second stage by opening a hydraulic valve.

9. A method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the pressure is applied using a mechanical servo driven drive and the pressure is released in the second stage by a pneumatic cylinder.

10. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the container is subjected to a plurality of tests.

11. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the first stage of the pressure profile has a duration of 30-250 mns.

12. A method as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the first stage of the pressure profile has a duration of 40-70 mns.

13. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the second stage of the pressure profile has a duration of 0-10 ms.

14. A method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the second stage of the pressure profile has a duration of 0-2 ms.

15. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the second stage immediately follows the first stage.

16. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the peak pressure is in the range 300-900 Bar.

17. A method as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the peak pressure is in the range 300-700 Bar.

18. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 10 , 13 and 15 , wherein the pressure to which the container is controlled using feedback from a pressure sensor.

19. A method as claimed in claim 18 , wherein the container comprises a glass capsule for a needle-less injector.

20. A method of testing a plurality of containers, comprising:

applying to each container of a plurality of containers a method comprising the steps of:

pressurizing each container to a pressure profile which in a first stage increases from a starting pressure to a peak pressure at a first average rate of pressure increase, and which in a second stage decreases from the peak pressure to the starting pressure at a second, greater, average rate of pressure decrease; and

determine if each container break as an indication of test failure, wherein the first stage of the pressure profile involved ramping the pressure substantially linearly to the peak pressure.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 8, 2012
From: OXFORD FINANCE LLC, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO OXFORD FINANCE CORPORATION
To: ZOGENIX, INC.
Reel/Frame 028752/0486 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 8, 2011
From: ZOGENIX, INC.
To: OXFORD FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 026565/0778 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 8, 2007
From: ARADIGM CORPORATION
To: ZOGENIX, INC.
Reel/Frame 018982/0131 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2006
From: KING, TOBY; BRIDGES, PAUL STUART; SHERGOLD, OLIVER
To: ARADIGM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 017474/0218 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 0229447.8 · Dec 18, 2002 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20060201577A1 · Sep 14, 2006