IP Library Granted Patent US 8,019,552
Granted Patent B2
US 8,019,552 · App. 10/591,800 · Granted Sep 13, 2011

Classification of breast cancer patients using a combination of clinical criteria and informative genesets

Assignees: The Netherlands Cancer Institute; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,019,552
App. No.
10/591,800
Granted
Sep 13, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention provides prognostic methods for conditions such as cancer, for example, breast cancer, comprising classifying an individual by a plurality of phenotypic, genotypic or clinical characteristics of the condition into a plurality of patient subsets, and analyzing the pattern of expression of prognosis-informative genes identified for that subset in a sample from the individual. The present invention also provides methods for constructing such patient subsets and of identifying prognosis-informative genesets for such subsets. The invention further provides methods of assigning a therapeutic regimen to an individual, microarrays useful for performing prognosis, kits comprising these microarrays, and computer systems and programs for implementing the methods of the invention.

Claims (47)

1. A method for predicting a human breast cancer patient as having a good prognosis or a poor prognosis, comprising:

(a) classifying said breast cancer patient into one of the following classes:

(a1) ER − and sporadic;

(a2) ER − and BRCA1;

(a3) ER+ and ER/AGE high;

(a4) ER+, ER/AGE low and LN+; or

(a5) ER+, ER/AGE low and LN − ;

wherein ER + designates a high ER level and ER − designates a low ER level, wherein said ER/AGE is a metric of said ER level relative to the age of said patient, and wherein LN + designates a greater than 0 lymph nodes status in said patient and LN − designates a 0 lymph nodes status in said patient, and wherein said ER/AGE is classified as high if said ER level is greater than c·(AGE−d), and wherein said ER/AGE is classified as low if said ER level is equal to or less than c·(AGE−d), wherein c is a coefficient, AGE is the age of said patient, and d is an age threshold;

(b) determining a profile comprising measurements of levels of transcripts of, or proteins encoded by, respective genes in a plurality of genes in a cell sample taken from said breast cancer patient, said respective genes comprising:

(b1) at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 1 if said breast cancer patient is classified as ER − and sporadic;

(b2) at least two of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 2 if said breast cancer patient is classified as ER − and BRCA1,

(b3) at least two of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 3 if said breast cancer patient is classified as ER+ and ER/AGE high;

(b4) at least two of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 4 if said breast cancer patient is classified as ER+, ER/AGE low and LN+; or

(b5) at least two of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 5 if said breast cancer patient is classified as ER+, ER/AGE low and LN − ; and

(c) comparing, on a computer, said profile to a good prognosis template and/or a poor prognosis template, wherein said good prognosis template comprises measurements of average levels of transcripts of, or proteins encoded by, said respective genes in a plurality of good outcome patients, and said poor prognosis template comprises measurements of average levels of transcripts of, or proteins encoded by, said respective genes in a plurality of poor outcome patients, and wherein a good outcome patient is a breast cancer patient who has non-reoccurrence of metastases within a first period of time after initial diagnosis and a poor outcome patient is a patient who has reoccurrence of metastases within a second period of time after initial diagnosis; and

(d) classifying said breast cancer patient (i) as having a good prognosis if said profile has a high similarity to said good prognosis template, has a low similarity to said poor prognosis template, or has a higher similarity to said good prognosis template than to said poor prognosis template, wherein said profile has a high similarity to said good prognosis template if the similarity to said good prognosis template is above a predetermined threshold or has a low similarity to said poor prognosis template if the similarity to said poor prognosis template is below said predetermined threshold, or (ii) as having a poor prognosis if said profile has a high similarity to said poor prognosis template, has a low similarity to said good prognosis template, or has a higher similarity to said poor prognosis template than to said good prognosis template, wherein said profile has a high similarity to said poor prognosis template if the similarity to said poor prognosis template is above said predetermined threshold, or has a low similarity to said good prognosis template if the similarity to said good prognosis template is below said predetermined threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER − and sporadic, and said plurality of genes comprises at least ten of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 1.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER − and sporadic, and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 1.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER − and BRCA1, and said plurality of genes comprises at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 2.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER − and BRCA1, and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 2.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER+ and ER/AGE high, and said plurality of genes comprises at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 3.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER+ and ER/AGE high, and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 3.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER+, ER/AGE low and LN+, and said plurality of genes comprises at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 4.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER+, ER/AGE low and LN+, and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 4.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER+, ER/AGE low and LN − , and said plurality of genes comprises at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 5.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein said individual is ER+, ER/AGE low and LN − , and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 5.

12. A computer-implemented method for predicting a human breast cancer patient as having a good prognosis or a poor prognosis, comprising:

(a) classifying, on a computer, said patient as having a good prognosis or a poor prognosis based on a profile comprising measurements of levels of transcripts of, or proteins encoded by, respective genes in a plurality of genes in a cell sample taken from said patient, said plurality of genes comprising:

(b1) at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 1 if said patient is ER − and sporadic;

(b2) at least two of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 2 if said patient is ER − and BRCA1;

(b3) at least two of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 3 if said patient is ER+ and ER/AGE high;

(b4) at least two of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 4 if said patient is ER+, ER/AGE low and LN+; or

(b5) at least two of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 5 if said patient is ER+, ER/AGE low and LN − ,

wherein ER+ designates a high ER level and ER − designates a low ER level, wherein said ER/AGE is a metric of said ER level relative to the age of said patient, wherein LN + designates a greater than 0 lymph nodes status in said patient and LN − designates a 0 lymph nodes status in patient, and wherein said ER/AGE is classified as high if said ER level is greater than c·(AGE−d), and wherein said ER/AGE is classified as low if said ER level is equal to or less than c·(AGE−d), wherein c is a coefficient, AGE is the age of said patient, and d is an age threshold,

wherein said classifying is carried out by a method comprising comparing said profile to a good prognosis template and/or a poor prognosis template, wherein said good prognosis template comprises measurements of average levels of transcripts of, or proteins encoded by, said respective genes in a plurality of good outcome patients, and said poor prognosis template comprises measurements of average levels of transcripts of, or proteins encoded by, said respective genes in a plurality of poor outcome patients, and wherein a good outcome patient is a breast cancer patient who has non-reoccurrence of metastases within a first period of time after initial diagnosis and a poor outcome patient is a breast cancer patient who has reoccurrence of metastases within a second period of time after initial diagnosis, and wherein:

(i) said individual is classified as having a good prognosis if said profile has a high similarity to said good prognosis template, has a low similarity to said poor prognosis template, or has a higher similarity to said good prognosis template than to said poor prognosis template, wherein said profile has a high similarity to said good prognosis template if the similarity to said good prognosis template is above a predetermined threshold, or has a low similarity to said poor prognosis template if the similarity to said poor prognosis template is below said predetermined threshold, or

(ii) said individual is classified as having a poor prognosis if said profile has a high similarity to said poor prognosis template, has a low similarity to said good prognosis template, or has a higher similarity to said poor prognosis template than to said good prognosis template, wherein said profile has a high similarity to said poor prognosis template if the similarity to said poor prognosis template is above said predetermined threshold, or has a low similarity to said good prognosis template if the similarity to said good prognosis template is below said predetermined threshold.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER − and sporadic, and said plurality of genes comprises at least ten of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 1.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER − and sporadic, and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 1.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER − and BRCA1, and said plurality of genes comprises at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 2.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER − and BRCA1, and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 2.

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER+ and ER/AGE high, and said plurality of genes comprises at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 3.

18. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER+ and ER/AGE high, and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 3.

19. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER+; ER/AGE low and LN+, and said plurality of genes comprises at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 4.

20. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER+, ER/AGE low and LN+, and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 4.

21. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER+, ER/AGE low and LN − , and said plurality of genes comprises at least five of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 5.

22. The method of claim 12 , wherein said individual has been classified as ER+, ER/AGE low and LN − , and said plurality of genes comprises all of the genes for which markers are listed in Table 5.

Assignments (4)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 22, 2010
From: MERCK & CO., INC.
To: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Reel/Frame 024118/0558 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 17, 2010
From: ROSETTA INPHARMATICS LLC
To: MERCK & CO., INC.
Reel/Frame 024090/0980 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2007
From: VAN'T VEER, LAURA J.
To: NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE, THE
Reel/Frame 019567/0154 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2007
From: DAI, HONGYUE; LAMB, JOHN; STOUGHTON, ROLAND; FRIEND, STEPHEN H.; HE, YUDONG
To: ROSETTA INPHARMATICS LLC
Reel/Frame 019578/0606 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 60650401 · Feb 4, 2005
Provisional Application 60604076 · Aug 24, 2004
Provisional Application 60550810 · Mar 5, 2004
Related Publication 20080187909A1 · Aug 7, 2008