IP Library Granted Patent US 7,576,535
Granted Patent B2
US 7,576,535 · App. 10/731,799 · Granted Aug 18, 2009

Multi-compartment separation in magnetic resonance using transient steady-state free precession imaging

Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,576,535
App. No.
10/731,799
Granted
Aug 18, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is a method of quantitatively separating tissue signals based on relaxation time differences. The method uses the transient signal decay in steady-state free precession (balanced SSFP) imaging to provide an alternative to standard CPMG methods of T 2 -relaxometry. The balanced SSFP technique allows 3-4 times the temporal resolution of CPMG, and also slows the short T 2 decay so that it can be more accurately measured.

Claims (77)

1. A method of separating species signals in a composite magnetic resonance imaging signal comprising the steps of:

a) applying a series of steady-state free precession (balanced SSFP) pulse sequences, wherein evolution of the steady-state in each balanced SSFP pulse sequence follows a smooth exponential path,

b) measuring magnetic resonance signals during transient periods for the balanced SSFP sequences as steady-state signals evolve, and

c) fitting the transient response of the measured signals to a model to identify the smallest number of discrete exponential terms which provide a satisfactory representation of the measured data, which utilizes a curve-fitting algorithm.

2. The method as defined by claim 1 wherein the curve-fitting algorithm utilizes non-negative least-squares.

3. The method as defined by claim 2 wherein the model in step c) is defined by:

M

(

t

)

=

i

=

1

N

C

i

-

t

τ

i

+

M

ss

where M(t) is the signal intensity as a function of time,

N is the number τ points used in the fit,

C i is relative amount of material with an exponential term constant τ i ,

M s s is steady-state signal in a voxel, and

τ is the exponential term in the fitting model.

4. The method as defined by claim 2 wherein a single data frame is acquired repeatedly over decay of the magnetic resonance signals.

5. The method as defined by claim 4 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied, wherein an inversion pulse is applied with the preparation pulses and magnetization starts at a negative value.

6. The method as defined by claim 4 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied and magnetization is saturated thereby.

7. The method as defined by claim 4 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied and magnetization starts in a steady state and is inverted in the steady state.

8. The method as defined by claim 2 wherein multiple data frames are acquired repeatedly over decay of the magnetic resonance signals.

9. The method as defined by claim 8 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied, wherein an inversion pulse is applied with the preparation pulses and magnetization starts at a negative value.

10. The method as defined by claim 8 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied and magnetization is saturated thereby.

11. The method as defined by claim 8 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied and magnetization starts in a steady state and is inverted in the steady state.

12. The method as defined by claim 2 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied, wherein an inversion pulse is applied with the preparation pulses and magnetization starts at a negative value.

13. The method as defined by claim 2 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied and magnetization is saturated thereby.

14. The method as defined by claim 2 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied and magnetization starts in a steady state and is inverted in the steady state.

15. The method as defined by claim 1 wherein the model in step c) is defined by:

M

(

t

)

=

i

=

1

M

C

i

t

τ

i

+

M

ss

where M(t) is the signal intensity as a function of time,

N is the number τ points used in the fit,

C i is relative amount of material with an exponential term constant τ i ,

M ss is steady-state signal in a voxel, and

τ is the exponential term in the fitting model.

16. The method as defined by claim 1 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied, wherein an inversion pulse is applied with the preparation pulses and magnetization staffs at a negative value.

17. The method as defined by claim 1 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied and magnetization is saturated thereby.

18. The method as defined by claim 1 wherein before step a) a plurality of preparation pulses are applied and magnetization staffs in a steady state and is inverted in the steady state.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 8, 2003
From: HARGREAVES, BRIAN A.
To: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, THE
Reel/Frame 014787/0171 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20050148858A1 · Jul 7, 2005