IP Library Granted Patent US 6,932,675
Granted Patent B1
US 6,932,675 · App. 10/771,842 · Granted Aug 23, 2005

Plated grinding wheel life maximization method

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,932,675
App. No.
10/771,842
Granted
Aug 23, 2005
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method of determining the condition of a grinding wheel is provided to avoid over use or premature changing of the grinding wheel in a grinding machine, such as for crankshaft or camshaft grinding. The grinding machine has a motor which drives a grinding spindle carrying an abrasive coated hub acting as a grinding wheel. Sensors detect the level of grinding force and motor torque required to grind a workpiece into a desired shape. The information is relayed to a controller, which averages and compares the grinding force and torque information to force and torque limits to determine the condition of the wheel. In addition, the controller compares grinding force and motor torque over a series of grinds to determine the level of increase between grinds to further determine the condition of the grinding wheel. If the level of increase exceeds an increase limit, the controller actuates a fault signal to stop the grinding machine indicating that the wheel is near the end of its life cycle.

Claims (20)

1. A method of determining the condition of an electroplated grinding wheel in a grinding machine having a grinding force sensor, while grinding a series of workpieces, the method comprising the steps of:

grinding successive workpieces with the grinding wheel and recording a series of readings of grinding force over selected portions of the grinding of the successive workpieces and relaying the grinding force information to a controller;

determining the averages of grinding forces recorded in said selected portions of the grinding of the successive workpieces;

comparing the averages of the recorded grinding forces of the successive workpieces to quantify an increase in average grinding force between selected portions of the grinding of the successively workpieces; and

actuating a fault signal when the increase in average grinding force exceeds a predetermined force increase limit indicating that the grinding wheel is near the end of its life cycle.

2. The method as in claim 1 including comparing a predetermined grinding force limit with the average of recorded grinding forces of each selected portion of the grinding of the successive workpieces to determine if any of the compared averages exceeds the predetermined grinding force limit.

3. The method as in claim 2 including actuating the fault signal when any of the compared averages exceeds the predetermined grinding force limit indicating that the grinding wheel is near the end of its life cycle.

4. The method as in claim 2 wherein the grinding force limit is established by adding at least 10 percent of the force capability of the grinding machine to the average grinding force of a typical workpiece with an unused grinding wheel.

5. The method as in claim 1 wherein the selected portion of the grinding is during the last rotation of the workpiece.

6. The method as in claim 1 wherein the selected portion of the grinding is during the second to the last rotation of each workpiece.

7. The method as in claim 1 wherein the predetermined force increase limit is 40 percent greater than the average grinding force of an immediately preceding ground workpiece.

8. The method as in claim 1 including recording a series of readings of grinding motor torque over selected portions of the grinding of successive workpieces and relaying the grinding motor torque information to a controller.

9. The method as in claim 8 including determining the averages of grinding motor torque recorded in said selected portions of the grinding of the successive workpieces.

10. The method as in claim 9 including comparing the averages of the recorded grinding motor torque during the selected portion of the grinding of each of the successive workpieces to quantify an increase in average grinding motor torque between selected portions of the grinding of the successive workpieces.

11. The method as in claim 10 including actuating the fault signal when the increase in average grinding motor torque exceeds a predetermined motor torque limit indicating that the grinding wheel is near the end of its life cycle.

12. The method as in claim 11 wherein motor torque increase limit is 40 percent greater than the average motor torque of an immediately preceding ground workpiece.

13. The method as in claim 9 including comparing a predetermined motor torque limit with the average motor torque of each selected portion of the grinding of the successive workpieces to determine if any of the compared averages exceeds the predetermined motor torque limit.

14. The method as in claim 13 including actuating the fault signal when any of the compared averages of motor torque exceeds the predetermined motor torque limit indicating that the grinding wheel is near the end of its life cycle.

15. The method as in claim 14 wherein the motor torque limit is established by adding at least 10 percent of the motor torque capability of the grinding machine to the average motor torque of a typical workpiece with an unused grinding wheel.

16. The method as in claim 1 wherein actuating the fault signal stops the grinding machine.

Assignments (13)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034371/0676 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025780/0902 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025327/0262 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0442 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025311/0770 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0052 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023127/0468 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023124/0429 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022553/0446 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0547 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 14, 2009
From: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 022117/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 25, 2004
From: BREMER, SHANE E.; HUCKER, SCOTT A.; BURGESS, PHILIP E.
To: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 014668/0790 →