IP Library Granted Patent US 7,718,385
Granted Patent B2
US 7,718,385 · App. 10/968,727 · Granted May 18, 2010

Bioactivation of alkylating agents for cancer treatment

Assignee: The Johns Hopkins University
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,718,385
App. No.
10/968,727
Granted
May 18, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A rapid screening method for identifying acylfulvenes and acylfulvene analogs with improved chemotherapeutic properties has been developed. The mechanism of toxicity of irofulven, a potentially clinically useful member of the acylfulvene class, has been elucidated and provides guidance for design and testing of a new class of alkylating agents with structures related to irofulven. The role of alkenal/one oxidoreductase (AOR) is shown to be important in cancer cell susceptibility to this class of alkylating agent.

Claims (12)

1. An in vitro method of assessing cancer cell toxicity of an acylfulvene candidate drug, wherein the cancer cell is selected from leukemia, non-small cell lung, colon, central nervous system, melanoma, ovarian, renal, prostate and breast cancer cells, and wherein the cancer cells expresses NADPH alkenal/one oxidoreductase (AOR), comprising: incubating the candidate drug with a medium chain reductase that reduces an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde/ketone fulvene at ring position 8,9 of the candidate drug, wherein the medium chain reductase is a polypeptide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO:3 or an amino acid sequence at least 95% identical thereto; determining a reduction rate for said candidate drug; and comparing said rate with a model substrate reduction rate; wherein a reduction rate for the candidate drug less than the reduction rate for the model substrate is predictive of increased cancer cell toxicity of the candidate acylfulvene drug compared with the model substrate, and wherein the model substrate is irofulvin.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the medium chain reductase is encoded by a nucleic acid having the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO:4 or variants thereof that encode the polypeptides set forth as SEQ ID NO 1 or SEQ ID NO: 3.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reduction rate is a maximum reduction rate (Vmax).

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the reduction rate is a specific activity rate.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the Vmax of the candidate acylfulvene drug has a Vmax equal to or less than the Vmax of irofulven.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising measuring double bond stability toward reduction by incubating the candidate acylfulvene drug with a nucleophile.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the nucleophile is glutathione.

8. An in vitro method of assessing cancer cell toxicity of an acylfulvene candidate drug, wherein the cancer coil is in vitro and is selected from leukemia, non-small cell lung, colon, central nervous system, melanoma, ovarian, renal, prostate and breast cancer cells, and wherein the cancer cell expresses NADPH alkenal/one oxidoreductase (AOR), comprising: incubating the candidate drug with a medium chain reductase that reduces an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde/ketone fulvene at ring position 8,9 of the candidate drug, wherein the medium chain reductase is a polypeptide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO:3 or an amino acid sequence at least 95% identical thereto; determining a reduction rate for said candidate drug; and comparing said rate with a model substrate reduction rate; wherein a reduction rate for the candidate drug less than the reduction rate for the model substrate is predictive of increased cancer cell toxicity of the candidate acylfulvene drug compared with the model substrate, and wherein the model substrate is selected from illudin M, illudin S or irofulvin.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the reduction rate is a maximum reduction rate (Vmax).

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the Vmax of the candidate acylfulvene drug has a Vmax equal to or less than the Vmax of irofulven.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the Vmax of the candidate acylfulvene drug has a Vmax of about one order of magnitude less than the Vmax of illudin M.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the Vmax of the candidate acylfulvene drug has a Vmax about two orders of magnitude less than the Vmax of illudin S.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Nov 8, 2017
From: JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 044396/0709 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 8, 2010
From: DICK, RYAN A.
To: THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 023910/0807 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 6051235000 · Oct 17, 2003
Provisional Application 6060525600 · Aug 27, 2004
Related Publication 20050176074A1 · Aug 11, 2005