IP Library Patent Application 10978980
Patent Application
App. No. 10/978,980

Categorizing work in a work system

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
10/978,980
Abstract

A method for categorizing work including receiving a response to a questionnaire from a person. The questionnaire includes a plurality of scales, with each of the scales corresponding to one of a plurality of work characteristics. Each scale includes one or more questions related to the corresponding work characteristic. Scale scores are computed for each of the scales within the questionnaire using the response from the person and the questionnaire as input. Two or more scales are combined into a work factor. A work factor score is computed for the work factor based on the contribution of each of the combined scales to the work factor. A work category is assigned based on the factor score.

Claims (38)

1 . A method for categorizing work, the method comprising:

receiving a response to a questionnaire from a person, the questionnaire including a plurality of scales, each of said scales corresponding to one of a plurality of work characteristics and including one or more questions related to the corresponding work characteristic;

computing scale scores for each of the scales within the questionnaire using the response from the person and the questionnaire as input;

combining two or more scales into a work factor;

computing a work factor score for the work factor based on the contribution of each of the combined scales to the work factor; and

assigning a work category based on the factor score.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of work characteristics include one or more of creativity, exceptions, analyzability, goal ambiguity, worker initiative, input ambiguity, task difficulty, interdependence, autonomy, interaction intensity, and feedback.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the work factor is routineness, ambiguity, initiative or complexity.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the work factor is routineness and the scales combined to create the work factor include scales corresponding to an exception work characteristic, a creativity work characteristic and an analyzability work characteristic.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the work factor is ambiguity and the scales combined to create the work factor include scales corresponding to a goal ambiguity work characteristic, a feedback work characteristic and an input ambiguity work characteristic.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the work factor is initiative and the scales combined to create the work factor include scales corresponding to a worker initiative work characteristic and an autonomy work characteristic.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the work factor is complexity and the scales combined to create the work factor include scales corresponding to a difficulty work characteristic, an interaction work characteristic and an interdependence work characteristic.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the person is an engineer.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the person is a manufacturing employee.

10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying performance improvement principles based on the work factor category.

11 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying performance improvement principles based on work category.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the training program is targeted to a supervisor of said person.

13 . The method of claim 1 , the questionnaire was sent electronically to the person.

14 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising transmitting the questionnaire to the person.

15 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising transmitting the work category to the person.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a combined work factor score is computed for a plurality of people.

17 . A computer program product for categorizing work, the computer program product comprising:

a storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method comprising:

receiving a response to a questionnaire from an person, the questionnaire including a plurality of scales, each of said scales corresponding to one of a plurality of work characteristics and including one or more questions related to the corresponding work characteristic;

computing scale scores for each of the scales within the questionnaire using the response from the person and the questionnaire as input;

combining two or more scales into a work factor;

computing a work factor score for the work factor based on the contribution of each of the combined scales to the work factor; and

assigning a work category based on the factor score.

18 . The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein the plurality of work characteristics include one or more of creativity, exceptions, analyzability, goal ambiguity, worker initiative, input ambiguity, task difficulty, interdependence, autonomy, interaction intensity, and feedback.

19 . The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein the work factor is routineness, ambiguity, initiative or complexity.

20 . The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein a combined work factor score is computed for a plurality of people.

21 . A system for categorizing work, the system comprising:

a host system in communication with a user system, the host system including instructions for:

receiving a response to a questionnaire from an person via the user system, the questionnaire including a plurality of scales, each of said scales corresponding to one of a plurality of work characteristics and including one or more questions related to the corresponding work characteristic;

computing scale scores for each of the scales within the questionnaire using the response from the person and the questionnaire as input;

combining two or more scales into a work factor;

computing a work factor score for the work factor based on the contribution of each of the combined scales to the work factor; and

assigning a work category based on the factor score.

Assignments (8)
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0052 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023127/0468 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023124/0429 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022553/0446 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0610 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 14, 2009
From: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 022102/0533 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2004
From: BENSON, JAN S.; JORDAN, WILLIAM C.; OWEN, SUSAN H.; KINTNER, HALLIE J.; REAUME, DANIEL J.
To: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015484/0338 →