IP Library Granted Patent US 7,138,060
Granted Patent B2
US 7,138,060 · App. 11/095,137 · Granted Nov 21, 2006

In situ remediation of contaminated groundwater

Assignee: Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,138,060
App. No.
11/095,137
Granted
Nov 21, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

In situ treatment of contaminated groundwater includes identifying a site contaminated with a pollutant susceptible to degradation by in situ, sulfate-reducing microorganisms. An amount of sulfate needed to support metabolization of the contaminants is estimated. The estimated amount of sulfate is applied to the site. In various alternatives of embodiments of the invention, the sulfate may be applied is a dry state or as a solution with water. The sulfate concentration in solution is in excess of 1000 ppm and may be as high as a near-saturation concentration.

Claims (39)

1. A method for treating contaminated groundwater in situ, said method comprising:

a. identifying a site contaminated with hydrocarbon contaminants;

b. estimating an amount of water contained within a contaminated plume of said site;

c. calculating an amount of sulfate that can be diluted by said estimated amount to remain below a fully-diluted sulfate contamination limit;

d. preparing a solution of water and an amount of sulfate less than said calculated amount and wherein a resulting concentration of sulfate in the solution is in excess of 1000 ppm; and

e. applying said prepared solution in a manner selected for said prepared solution to enter said contaminated plume.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said estimating of step (b) includes:

a. calculating a potential volume of said contaminated plume; and

b. multiplying said potential volume by an assumed porosity of said plume.

3. A method according to claim 1 wherein said calculating of step (c) includes:

a. identifying a maximum target amount of sulfate concentration for said plume; and

b. multiplying said estimated amount of water by said target amount.

4. A method according to claim 1 wherein said preparing of step (d) includes mixing said amount of sulfate with an amount of water selected to form a near-saturated mixture.

5. A method according to claim 1 wherein said applying of step (e) includes a topical application of said prepared solution to said site overlying said plume.

6. A method according to claim 1 wherein said applying of step (e) includes an underground application of said prepared solution to said site overlying said plume.

7. A method according to claim 6 wherein said underground application includes forming a well from a surface of said site into said plume and applying said prepared solution to said well.

8. A method according to claim 6 wherein said underground application includes burying a permeable distribution conduit within said site and applying said prepared solution to said conduit.

9. A method according to claim 1 wherein said applying of step (e) includes applying said solution to said site within 100 feet hydraulically up-gradient of an edge of said plume.

10. A method according to claim 1 wherein said identifying of step (a) includes identifying said site as having, in situ, sulfate-reducing microorganisms known to degrade hydrocarbon contaminants in anaerobic conditions.

11. A method for treating contaminated groundwater in situ, said method comprising:

a. identifying a site contaminated with hydrocarbon contaminants and having, in situ, sulfate-reducing microorganisms known to degrade hydrocarbon contaminants in anaerobic conditions;

b. preparing a solution of water and sulfate with a sulfate concentration in excess of defined pollutant limits of sulfate contamination for water and wherein a resulting concentration of sulfate in the solution is in excess of 1000 ppm; and

c. applying said prepared solution in a manner selected for said prepared solution to enter said contaminated plume.

12. A method according to claim 11 wherein said preparing of step (b) includes mixing said amount of sulfate with an amount of water selected to form a near-saturated mixture.

13. A method according to claim 11 wherein said preparing of step (b) includes first:

a. estimating an amount of water contained within a contaminated plume of said site;

b. calculating an amount of sulfate that be diluted by said estimated amount to remain below a sulfate contamination limit; and

c. said preparing includes preparing a solution of water and an amount of sulfate less than said calculated amount.

14. A method according to claim 11 wherein said estimating of step (b) includes.

a. calculating a potential volume of said contaminated plume; and

b. multiplying said potential volume by an assumed porosity of said plume.

15. A method according to claim 13 wherein said calculating of step (c) includes:

a. identifying a maximum target amount of sulfate concentration for said plume; and

b. multiplying said estimated amount of water by said target amount.

16. A method according to claim 11 wherein said applying of step (c) includes a topical application of said prepared solution to said site overlying said plume.

17. A method according to claim 11 wherein said applying of step (c) includes an underground application of said prepared solution to said site overlying said plume.

18. A method according to claim 17 wherein said underground application includes forming a well from a surface of said site into said plume and applying said prepared solution to said well.

19. A method according to claim 17 wherein said underground application includes burying a permeable distribution conduit within said site and applying said prepared solution to said conduit.

20. A method according to claim 11 wherein said applying of step (c) includes applying said solution to said site within 100 feet hydraulically up-gradient of an edge of said plume.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 24, 2011
From: DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
To: ANTEA USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 027111/0531 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2005
From: CUTHBERTSON, JAMES FLOYD
To: DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 016437/0443 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20060219631A1 · Oct 5, 2006