IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,336,560
Granted Patent B2
US 7,336,560 · App. 11/139,820 · Granted Feb 26, 2008

Method for determination of sufficient acquisition coverage for a marine seismic streamer survey

Assignee: PGS Geophysical AS
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,336,560
App. No.
11/139,820
Granted
Feb 26, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

Seismic data sets representative of a marine seismic streamer survey are constructed with test coverage holes in the data sets. The data sets are processed and data quality degradation in the processed data due to the test coverage holes is evaluated. Maximum acceptable coverage holes for the survey are determined from the evaluation of data quality degradation.

Claims (40)

1. A method for determination of sufficient acquisition coverage for a marine seismic streamer survey, comprising:

constructing full coverage seismic data sets representative of the survey;

constructing partial coverage seismic data sets with test coverage holes, the holes having a plurality of sizes;

processing the full coverage and partial coverage seismic data sets;

estimating data quality degradation due to the test coverage holes in the processed seismic data sets at test offsets and test depths; and

determining maximum acceptable coverage holes for the survey from the estimated data quality degradation.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the initial steps of:

selecting a size range for the test coverage holes for the survey;

selecting the test offsets for the survey; and

selecting the test depths for the survey.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the test offsets comprises test offset ranges.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the steps of selecting depend upon survey objectives and geology in the survey.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the seismic data sets comprise synthetic seismic data sets.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the seismic data sets comprise real seismic data sets.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the seismic data sets comprise a combination of synthetic and real seismic data sets.

8. The method of claim 5 , wherein the step of constructing a full coverage seismic data set comprises:

constructing a velocity model for the survey area;

determining a survey vessel configuration for the survey; and

generating synthetics from the velocity model and survey vessel configuration to construct a full coverage seismic data set.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the velocity model comprises a set of velocity models.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the step of constructing partial coverage seismic data sets comprises:

removing data from the full coverage data set to model test coverage holes spanning the selected size range.

11. The method of claim 5 , wherein the step of constructing a full coverage seismic data set comprises:

selecting available real data to construct a full coverage seismic data set.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the step of constructing partial coverage seismic data sets comprises:

removing data from the full coverage data set to model test coverage holes spanning the selected size range.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of processing the seismic data sets comprises pre-stack migration.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of estimating the data quality degradation due to the test coverage holes comprises:

comparing the data quality in the processed partial coverage seismic data sets to the data quality in the processed full coverage seismic data sets.

15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the step of comparing the data quality in the processed seismic data sets comprises:

processing the data removed from the full coverage data set to model a test coverage hole; and

comparing the data quality in the processed removed data to the data quality in the processed full coverage seismic data set.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein the step of comparing the data quality in the processed seismic data sets comprises:

processing the data removed from the full coverage data set to model a test coverage hole; and

comparing the data quality in the processed removed data to the data quality in the processed full coverage seismic data set.

17. The method of claim 14 , wherein the step of comparing the data quality in the processed seismic data sets comprises:

measuring artifacts in the processed seismic data sets caused by the test coverage holes.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the artifacts measured are taken from a set including amplitude decay, time shifts, phase distortion, and noise-induced migration smiles.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the artifacts measured are based on expected frequency content of the processed seismic data sets.

20. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining infill specifications from the determined maximum acceptable coverage holes.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2006
From: REKDAL, THORBJORN; DAY, ANTHONY; STRAND, CHRISTIAN
To: PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS
Reel/Frame 017520/0161 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 25, 2005
From: REKDAL, THORBJORN; DAY, ANTHONY; STRAND, CHRISTIAN
To: PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES
Reel/Frame 016669/0125 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20060268662A1 · Nov 30, 2006