IP Library Granted Patent US 7,704,216
Granted Patent B2
US 7,704,216 · App. 11/210,396 · Granted Apr 27, 2010

Method for assessing the accuracy of test results

Assignee: Audiology Incorporated
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,704,216
App. No.
11/210,396
Granted
Apr 27, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for developing and validating a quality assessment for a test is provided. A test method is also provided, which assesses the accuracy of a test. The methods include performing a behavioral test on a subject to measure a psychometric quantity, measuring one or more quality indicators, the quality indicators being any variables that are correlated with test accuracy, obtaining an independent measure of test accuracy, and deriving a predictive formula for estimating test accuracy from the quality indicators.

Claims (21)

1. A method for developing a predictive formula for calculating a quantitative measure of test accuracy, comprising:

performing a behavioral test on a subject using a test system to measure a psychometric quantity;

measuring the psychometric quantity to provide a test measurement of the psychometric quantity;

measuring one or more quality indicators to provide one or more quality indicator measurements, the quality indicator being any variable that gives an indication of test accuracy;

obtaining an independent measurement of the psychometric quantity for the subject, independent measurement being obtained separately from said behavioral test;

calculating a difference between the test measurement and the independent measurement;

determining a relationship between the quality indicator measurements and the difference between the test measurement and the independent measurement; and

deriving a predictive formula based on the relationship, wherein the predictive formula can be used to calculate a quantitative measure of test accuracy in the behavioral test on future subjects.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the performing a behavioral test comprises:

providing stimuli to the subject; and

receiving, from the subject, responses to the stimuli.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the measuring one or more quality indicators comprises measuring quality indicators based upon variables seen when the stimuli is provided or when the responses are received.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the obtaining an independent measurement comprises performing a method for measuring the psychometric quantity that is regarded as an accurate method for measuring that psychometric quantity.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the obtaining an independent measurement comprises performing a standardized test method for measuring the psychometric quantity.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the deriving a predictive formula comprises performing a multiple regression for the quality indicator measurements and the difference between the test measurement and the independent measurement.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the predictive formula is QA=Q i −Q m =f(QI n ).

8. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of the quality indicators is a behavior.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein at least one of the quality indicators is a subject behavior.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the steps of performing a behavioral test on a subject to measure a psychometric quantity is administered automatically and the step of obtaining an independent measurement of the psychometric quantity is administered manually.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the behavioral test is a hearing test and the psychometric quantity is a frequency threshold.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the one or more quality indicators include a masker alert rate, time per trial, average number of trials for a threshold, total elapsed time, false alarm rate, average test-retest difference, quality check fail rate, air-bone gap >50 dB and air-bone gap <−10 dB.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 8, 2026
From: MARGOLIS, ROBERT
To: AUDIOLOGY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 075199/0487 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2026
From: AUDIOLOGY INCORPORATED
To: INTERACOUSTICS A/S
Reel/Frame 075143/0086 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Dec 9, 2011
From: AUDIOLOGY INCORPORATED
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 027358/0282 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 11, 2010
From: MARGOLIS, ROBERT
To: AUDIOLOGY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 024063/0048 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070179398A1 · Aug 2, 2007