IP Library Granted Patent US 7,272,719
Granted Patent B2
US 7,272,719 · App. 11/288,820 · Granted Sep 18, 2007

Method to control access between network endpoints based on trust scores calculated from information system component analysis

Assignee: Signacert, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,272,719
App. No.
11/288,820
Granted
Sep 18, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

Signatures are generated for modules in a computer system. The signatures can be assembled into an integrity log. The signatures are compared with signatures in a database in an integrity validator. Once signatures are either validated or invalidated, a trust score can be generated. The trust score can then be used to determine whether the computer system should be granted access to a resource using a policy.

Claims (41)

1. An apparatus, comprising:

a database arranged to store a first plurality of signatures for a first plurality of modules;

a receiver to receive a second plurality of signatures corresponding to a second plurality of modules in a machine;

a validator operative to compare at least a received one of the second plurality of signatures with the one or more of plurality of signatures in the database, to identify a first subset of the second plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are found in the database, and to identify a second subset of the second plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are not found in the database; and

a trust score generator to generate a trust score for the machine based on the first subset of the second plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are found in the database and the second subset of the second plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are not found in the database.

2. An apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the first plurality of signatures for the first plurality of modules includes a first plurality of hashes for the plurality of modules.

3. An apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein:

the apparatus further comprises a transmitter to transmit the signatures corresponding to the second subset of the second plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are not found in the database to a second database of signatures;

the receiver is operative to receive from the second database a second trust score; and

the trust score generator is operative to generate the trust score based on the first subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are found in the database and the second trust score.

4. An apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein:

the database is arranged to store a first plurality of identifiers for the first plurality of modules;

the receiver is operative to receive a second plurality of identifiers for the second plurality of modules in the machine; and

the validator is operative to compare the second plurality of signatures with the plurality of signatures in the database using the second plurality of identifiers for the plurality of modules in the machine.

5. An apparatus according to claim 1 , further comprising a policy to control access to a resource, the policy including a threshold score to receive full access to the resource.

6. An apparatus according to claim 5 , the policy further comprising a second threshold score to receive partial access to the resource.

7. An apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the receiver is operative to receive a signature of a module to add to the database.

8. An apparatus according to claim 1 , further comprising a transmitter to transmit said trust score to the machine.

9. A method, comprising:

receiving a first plurality of signatures corresponding to a plurality of modules in a machine;

comparing the first plurality of signatures for the plurality of modules with a second plurality of signatures in a database;

identifying a first subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are found in the database and a second subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are not found in the database; and

generating a trust score for the machine based on the first subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are found in the database and a second subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are not found in the database.

10. A method according to claim 9 , further comprising controlling access to a resource on a network based on the trust score.

11. A method according to claim 10 , wherein controlling access to a resource on a network based on the trust score includes:

accessing a policy for access to the resource on the network; and

using the policy to control access to the resource based on the trust score.

12. A method according to claim 11 , wherein using the policy to control access to the resource based on the trust score includes granting full access to the resource if the trust score exceeds a threshold score according to the policy.

13. A method according to claim 11 , wherein using the policy to control access to the resource based on the trust score includes granting partial access to the resource if the trust score is higher than a first threshold score but lower than a second threshold score according to the policy.

14. A method according to claim 11 , wherein using the policy to control access to the resource based on the trust score includes denying access to the resource if the trust score is lower than a threshold score according to the policy.

15. A method according to claim 9 , wherein generating a trust score includes weighting at least a first module more highly than at least a second module in generating the trust score.

16. A method according to claim 9 , wherein receiving a first plurality of signatures includes receiving an integrity log including the first plurality of signatures corresponding to the plurality of modules.

17. A method according to claim 9 , wherein:

the method further comprises:

forwarding the signatures corresponding to the second subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are not found in the database to a second database of signatures; and

receiving from the second database a third subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are found in the second database and a fourth subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are not found in the second database; and

generating a trust score includes generating the trust score based on the first subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are found in the database and the third subset of the plurality of modules for which the corresponding signatures are found in the third database.

18. A method according to claim 9 , wherein:

receiving a first plurality of signatures corresponding to a plurality of modules includes receiving the first plurality of signatures and a plurality of identifiers for the plurality of modules; and

comparing the first plurality of signatures for the plurality of modules with a second plurality of signatures in a database includes comparing the first plurality of signatures for the plurality of modules with the second plurality of signatures in the database using the plurality of identifiers for the plurality of modules.

19. A method according to claim 9 , further comprising transmitting the bust score to the machine.

Assignments (12)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2016
From: FORTRESS CREDIT CO LLC
To: FORTRESS CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES I LP
Reel/Frame 039104/0946 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2016
From: FORTRESS CREDIT CO LLC
To: FORTRESS CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES I LP
Reel/Frame 039104/0979 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2015
From: SIGNACERT, INC
To: FORTRESS CREDIT CO LLC
Reel/Frame 034700/0390 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2015
From: SIGNACERT, INC
To: KIP SIGN P1 LP
Reel/Frame 034700/0842 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2015
From: KIP SIGN P1 LP
To: FORTRESS CREDIT CO LLC
Reel/Frame 034701/0170 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2013
From: HARRIS CORPORATION
To: SIGNACERT, INC.
Reel/Frame 029804/0310 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 13, 2012
From: SIGNACERT, INC.
To: HARRIS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 029467/0639 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 28, 2011
From: SIGNACERT, INC.
To: HARRIS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 026195/0473 →
RELEASE OF IP SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 4, 2008
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: SIGNACERT, INC.
Reel/Frame 021147/0412 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE IN A DOCUMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 020555 FRAME 0181. THE ASSIGNOR DOES HEREBY CONFIRM THE SECURITY AGREEMENT. Recorded Mar 31, 2008
From: SIGNACERT, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 020723/0727 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 19, 2008
From: SIGNACERT, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 020555/0181 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2006
From: BLECKMANN, DAVID MAURITS; STARNES, WILLIAM WYATT; ANDERSEN, BRADLEY DOUGLAS
To: SIGNACERT, INC.
Reel/Frame 018191/0836 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 6063706600 · Dec 17, 2004
Provisional Application 6063144900 · Nov 29, 2004
Provisional Application 6063145000 · Nov 29, 2004
Related Publication 20060117184A1 · Jun 1, 2006