IP Library Granted Patent US 7,906,024
Granted Patent B2
US 7,906,024 · App. 11/338,214 · Granted Mar 15, 2011

Shear protectants in harvest microfiltration

Assignee: Wyeth Research Ireland Limited
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,906,024
App. No.
11/338,214
Granted
Mar 15, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The addition of buffer to a harvest stream during diafiltration can cause increased turbidity and have other undesirable effects including limiting product recovery. Methods and compositions related to the use of a non-ionic surfactant are provided for improving diafiltration.

Claims (22)

1. A method for harvesting a product from a cell culture by diafiltration, the method comprising

(a) providing a retentate for diafiltration, wherein the retentate is a retentate from harvest microfiltration of a cell culture;

(b) adding a non-ionic surfactant to the retentate; and

(c) performing diafiltration of the retentate, thereby harvesting a product from a cell culture.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-ionic surfactant is Pluronic® F68.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-ionic surfactant is polyvinyl alcohol (PVA).

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-ionic surfactant is in a buffer.

5. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the non-ionic surfactant is in a buffer and the concentration of the non-ionic surfactant in the buffer is between 0.2 g/L and 4 g/L, 0.2 g/L and 3 g/L, 0.5 g/L and 2.5 g/L, 0.5g/L and 2 g/L, and 0.5 g/L and 1.5 g/L.

6. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the concentration of the non-ionic surfactant in the buffer is about 1 g/L or 2.5 g/L.

7. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the retentate comprises cells and culture medium.

8. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the turbidity of the filtrate resulting from the diafiltration is reduced compared to the diafiltration performed in the absence of non-ionic surfactant.

9. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the qualitative or quantitative recovery of a product from the retentate is increased in the presence of the non-ionic surfactant compared to recovery of the product in the absence of the non-ionic surfactant.

10. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the retentate comprises a pharmaceutical product.

11. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the retentate comprises a recombinant protein.

12. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the retentate comprises a buffer isotonic to a cell in the retentate.

13. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the retentate comprises phosphate buffered saline (PBS).

14. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein the diafiltration step occurs at a temperature of about 20° C. to 25° C. 2° C. to 37° C., or 2° C. to 25° C.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the diafiltration is discontinuous diafiltration.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the diafiltration is constant volume diafiltration.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the concentration of the non-ionic surfactant does not substantially change during diafiltration.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-ionic surfactant is in a cell culture medium.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the concentration of non-ionic surfactant is maintained at about 1 g/L.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 12, 2012
From: WYETH RESEARCH IRELAND LIMITED
To: PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS OPERATIONS SUPPORT GROUP
Reel/Frame 028043/0643 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 11, 2006
From: PIERCE, JAMES; MORAN, ENDA
To: WYETH RESEARCH IRELAND LIMITED
Reel/Frame 017604/0151 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 60647184 · Jan 25, 2005
Related Publication 20060194313A1 · Aug 31, 2006