Apparatus and method for the analysis of a process having parameter-based faults

1. An apparatus for the analysis of a process having parameter-based faults, comprising:

a parameter value inputer configured for inputting values of at least one process parameter;

a fault detector, configured for detecting the occurrence of a fault;

a learning file creator associated with said parameter value inputer and said fault detector, configured for separating said input values into a first learning file and a second learning file, said first learning file comprising input values from a collection period preceding each of said detected faults, and said second learning file comprising input values input outside said collection periods; and

a learning file analyzer associated with said learning file creator, configured for performing a separate statistical analysis of said first and second learning files, thereby to assess a process status.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein said learning file analyzer is configured to separately convert said first and second learning files into a respective first and second probability density of occurrence, for at least pairs of parameters.

3. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein said learning file analyzer is further configured to superimpose said first and second probability densities of occurrence onto a single graph, and to determine a fault risk level over said graph with respect to said superimposed probability densities.

4. The apparatus of claim 3 , wherein said learning file analyzer is further configured to interpolate fault risk levels determined over a plurality of graphs to obtain an overall risk.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein said at least one process parameter comprises a controllable process parameter.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein said fault detector is configured for automatic fault detection.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein said fault detector is configured to receive user inputs indicating the occurrence of a fault.

8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein said learning file creator is configured to estimate a duration of a pre-fault period in which a causal relationship exists between process parameter values and said fault, and to set said collection period to less than said estimated duration.

9. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein a duration of said collection period is specifiable by a user.

10. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a process modeler operable to provide a model of said process.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein said process modeler is configured to model said process as a knowledge tree mapping of relationships between said process parameters and process outputs.

12. The apparatus of claim 10 , further comprising a clusterer associated with said process modeler, for clustering interrelated process parameters into at least one cluster.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein said learning file analyzer is configured to perform joint statistical analyses of clustered parameters.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein said joint statistical analysis comprises providing a multi-dimensional probability density function of said clustered parameters.

15. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein each of said clusters is associated with a respective collection duration.

16. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a control unit configured to determine a preferred value of a controllable parameter so as to reduce a probability of a fault.

17. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein said control unit is further configured to automatically adjust a value of said controllable parameter to said preferred value.

18. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a discretizer configured for dividing a range of input parameter values into discrete sub-ranges.

19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein said discretizer is operable to select split values for said sub-ranges so as to maximize an average time between faults while retaining a statistically-significant sample within a range.

20. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a risk evaluator configured for evaluating a fault risk level for a process having a specified set of process parameter values.

21. The apparatus of claim 20 , wherein said fault risk level comprises at least one of a group consisting of: an estimated time until fault, and an estimated probability of a fault within a specified time interval.

22. The apparatus of claim 20 , wherein said risk evaluator comprises a parameter array generator configured for maintaining a risk level array, each dimension of said array comprising a respective process parameter subdivided into ranges, and for generating for each element of said array a respective fault risk level estimation in accordance with said statistical analyses.

23. The apparatus of claim 22 , wherein said fault risk level is determined over a set of historically-collected data.

24. The apparatus of claim 22 , wherein said fault risk level comprises a binary indicator indicating high-risk and low-risk process conditions.

25. The apparatus of claim 22 , wherein said risk evaluator is operable to utilize said risk level array as a lookup table, and to determine a risk level for a specified set of parameter values from a corresponding element of said risk level array.

26. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a process monitor for monitoring parameter values of an ongoing process so as to determine a current status of said ongoing process.

27. The apparatus of claim 26 , wherein said process monitor is configured to provide alerts to a process operator in accordance with said current status.

28. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein said process comprises papermaking and said fault comprises a paper break.

29. A method for the analysis of a process having parameter-based faults, comprising:

inputting the values of at least one process parameter over time;

detecting occurrences of process faults;

separating said input values into a first learning file and a second learning file, said first learning file comprising input values from a collection period preceding each of said detected faults, and said second learning file comprising input values input outside said collection periods; and

performing a separate statistical analysis of said first and second learning files, thereby to asses a process status for a specified set of parameter values.

30. The method of claim 29 , further comprising separately converting said first and second learning files into a respective first and second probability density of occurrence, for at least pairs of parameters.

31. The method of claim 30 , further comprising superimposing said first and second probability densities of occurrence onto a single graph, and determining a fault risk level over said graph with respect to said superimposed probability densities.

32. The method of claim 31 , further comprising interpolating fault risk levels determined over a plurality of graphs to obtain an overall risk.

33. The method of claim 29 , wherein said specified set comprise current process parameter values.

34. The method of claim 29 , wherein said process status comprises at least one of a group consisting of: an estimated time until fault, and an estimated probability of a fault within a specified time interval.

35. The method of claim 29 , further comprising receiving an external indicator of the occurrence of a fault.

36. The method of claim 29 , further comprising estimating a duration of a pre-fault period in which a causal relationship exists between process parameter values and said fault, and setting said collection period to less than said estimated duration.

37. The method of claim 29 , wherein receiving a user input indicating a collection period duration.

38. The method of claim 29 , further comprising providing a model of said process.

39. The method of claim 29 , further comprising determining a preferred value for a controllable parameter so as to reduce a probability of a fault.

40. The method of claim 39 , further comprising adjusting said controllable parameter to said preferred value.

41. The method of claim 29 , further comprising forming clusters of interrelated process parameters.

42. The method of claim 41 , wherein said statistical analysis comprises providing a multi-dimensional probability density function of clustered parameters.

43. The method of claim 41 , wherein each of said clusters is associated with a respective collection period duration.

44. The method of claim 29 further comprising dividing a range of input parameter values into discrete sub-ranges.

45. The method of claim 44 , wherein said ranges are selected so as to maximize an average time between faults while retaining a statistically significant sample within a range.

46. Method of claim 29 , further comprising evaluating a fault risk level for a process having a specified set of process parameter values.

47. The method of claim 29 , further comprising maintaining a risk level array, each dimension of said array comprising a respective process parameter subdivided into ranges, and generating for each element of said array a respective fault risk level in accordance with said statistical analyses.

48. The method of claim 47 , wherein said risk level estimation comprises a binary indicator indicating high-risk and low-risk process conditions.

49. The method of claim 47 , further comprising a risk determiner configured for looking-up a risk level estimation of a specified set of parameter values in said array.

50. The method of claim 29 , further comprising providing alerts to a process operator in accordance with a current process status.