IP Library Granted Patent US 7,910,337
Granted Patent B2
US 7,910,337 · App. 11/636,394 · Granted Mar 22, 2011

Method for identifying drug-sensitizing antisense DNA fragments and use thereof

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,910,337
App. No.
11/636,394
Granted
Mar 22, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention provides a method for generating and selecting drug-sensitizing antisense DNA fragments. In one embodiment, the method includes identifying a gene of interest using knowledge of bacterial physiology, biochemistry, genetics, genomics, and other means. The method includes PCR amplification of a gene of interest using genomic DNA as a template; fragmentation of the DNA by sonication or other means; selecting DNA fragments no longer than 400 base pairs; ligating the DNA fragments into a suitable expression plasmid with a selectable marker; transforming the plasmids containing the DNA fragments into the organism from which the gene of interest originated; and selecting clones from transformed cells that show a phenotypic difference of the clone grown in the presence of the inducer relative to the phenotype in the absence of inducer.

Claims (55)

1. A method for generating and selecting drug-sensitizing antisense DNA fragments comprising:

selecting a gene of interest using means other than genomic surveys of antisense-defined proliferation genes,

amplification of the gene of interest using genomic DNA as a template,

fragmentation of the DNA by sonication or other means;

selecting DNA fragments no longer than 400 base pairs;

ligating the DNA fragments into a suitable expression plasmid with a selectable marker;

transforming the plasmids containing the DNA fragments into the organism from which the gene of interest originated; and

selecting clones from transformed cells that show a discernible phenotypic difference of the clone grown in the presence of the inducer relative to the phenotype in the absence of inducer.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the discernible phenotype is relative sensitivity to a growth inhibiting compound.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the discernible phenotype is requirement of a nutrient to the growth medium.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the discernible phenotype is visible morphology such as shape.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the discernible phenotype is relative sensitivity to osmotic stress.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the discernible phenotype is colony size.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of DNA biosynthesis.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of RNA biosynthesis.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of protein biosynthesis.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of fatty acid biosynthesis.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of amino acid biosynthesis.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of nucleotide biosynthesis.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of vitamin biosynthesis.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of isoprenoid biosynthesis.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of co-factor biosynthesis.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of MurB.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of UppS.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an antibiotic acting through inhibition of DHFR.

20. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is a beta-lactam antibiotic.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is a diaminopyrimidine antibiotic.

22. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is macrolide antibiotic.

23. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is daptomycin.

24. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic including ciprofloxacin.

25. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is a tetracycline.

26. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is an oxazolidinone.

27. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is fosfomycin.

28. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is fosmidomycin.

29. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is mupirocin.

30. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is a lipopeptide.

31. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is a glycopeptide.

32. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is vancomycin.

33. The method of claim 1 , wherein the drug is trimethoprim.

34. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene murB-2 and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:1 Ba-murB2-C1.

35. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene murB-2 and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:2 Ba-murB2-H1.

36. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene murB-2 and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:3 Ba-murB2-D1.

37. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene murB-2 and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:4 Ba-murB2-D2.

38. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene metS and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:5 Ba-metRS1-H1.

39. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene metS and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:6 Ba-metRS1-H2.

40. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene metS and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:7 Ba-metRS1-H6.

41. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene metS and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:8 Ba-metRS1-E4.

42. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene uppS and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:9 Ba-uppS-UG9.

43. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene uppS and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:10 Ba-uppS-UA3.

44. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene dfrA and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:11 Ba-dfrA-2G1.

45. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Bacillus anthracis gene dfrA and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:12 Ba-dfrA-2G6.

46. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Staphylococcus aureus gene murB and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:13 Sa-murB-E9.

47. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Staphylococcus aureus gene murB and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:14 Sa-murB-F7.

48. The method of claim 1 , wherein said antisense-oriented fragment is a fragment of the Staphylococcus aureus gene murB and is comprised of the sequence specified for SEQ ID:15 Sa-murB-B9.

Assignments (1)
MERGER Recorded Aug 8, 2022
From: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
To: MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC
Reel/Frame 061102/0145 →