IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,936,883
Granted Patent B2
US 7,936,883 · App. 11/661,507 · Granted May 3, 2011

Quantum key distribution protocol

Assignee: The Foundation for the Promotion of Industrial Science
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,936,883
App. No.
11/661,507
Granted
May 3, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A quantum key distribution protocol is provided that reduces the maximum value of the leaked information amount over the same distance when an adversary makes a photon number splitting attack more than the reduction by the BB84 protocol and the SARG protocol, by making use of the advantages of the BB84 protocol and the SARG protocol. By properly proportioning the existing BB84 protocol and the SARG protocol in accordance with the rate determined by the communication distance between the sender and the receiver of the coherent light, a protocol that is more robust against photon number splitting attack than the known existing protocols can be realized, and long distance quantum key distribution, which was not possible until now, becomes possible.

Claims (22)

1. A quantum key distribution protocol used in a quantum key distribution system implemented by using a pulse of weak coherent light, comprising:

determining a ratio of usage of one of two kinds of existing protocols to usage of the other of the two kinds of existing protocols in accordance with a communication distance between a sender and a receiver of the weak coherent light; and

switching a protocol to be used between the two kinds of existing protocols in accordance with the ratio,

wherein the two kinds of existing protocols are the BB84 protocol vulnerable to storage attacks, and the SARG protocol vulnerable to intercept-resend with unambiguous discrimination attacks, and

if an average number of photons in the pulse of the weak coherent light when the BB84 protocol is used independently is taken as μ, and if an average number of photons in the pulse of the weak coherent light when the SARG protocol is used independently is taken as 2μ, and if the minimum distance at which a mutual information amount that can be acquired by an eavesdropper reduces more than when the BB84 protocol and the SARG protocol are each used independently is taken as m, and if the maximum distance at which the mutual information amount that can be acquired by the eavesdropper becomes less than 1 when the protocol to be used is switched between the two kinds of existing protocols in accordance with the ratio is taken as M, and if the communication distance is taken as L, L being a value between m and M, the ratio a of usage of the BB84 protocol to usage of the SARG protocol is determined as a≦(L−m)/(M−m), a being a value other than 0 and 1, and the average number of photons is determined as μ×2/(1+a).

2. The quantum key distribution protocol as recited in claim 1 , wherein if the average number of photons in the pulse of the weak coherent light when the BB84 protocol is independently used is 0.1 [photon/pulse], and if the average number of photons in the pulse of the weak coherent light when the SARG protocol is independently used is 0.2 [photon/pulse], and if M=125 km and m=87.5 km, the ratio a is determined as a≦(L−87.5)/(125−87.5), a being a value other than 0 and 1 and L being a value between 87.5 km and 125 km, and the average number of photons is determined as 0.2/(1+a).

3. A quantum key distribution protocol used in a quantum key distribution system implemented by using a pulse of weak coherent light, comprising:

determining a ratio of usage of one of two kinds of existing protocols to usage of the other of the two kinds of existing protocols in accordance with a communication distance between a sender and a receiver of the weak coherent light; and

switching a protocol to be used between the two kinds of existing protocols in accordance with the ratio,

wherein the two kinds of existing protocols are the BB84 protocol vulnerable to storage attacks and the SARG protocol vulnerable to intercept-resend with unambiguous discrimination attacks, and

if an average number of photons in the pulse of the weak coherent light when the BB84 protocol is used independently is taken as μ, and if an average number of photons in the pulse of the weak coherent light when the SARG protocol is used independently is taken as 2μ, and if the minimum distance at which a mutual information amount that can be acquired by an eavesdropper reduces more than when the BB84 protocol and the SARG protocol are each used independently is taken as m, and if the maximum distance at which the mutual information amount that can be acquired by the eavesdropper becomes less than 1 when the protocol to be used is switched between the two kinds of existing protocols in accordance with the ratio is taken as M, and if the maximum distance at which the mutual information amount that can be acquired by the eavesdropper becomes less than 1 when the BB84 protocol and the SARG protocol are each used independently is taken as n, and if the communication distance is taken as L, L being a value between n and M, the ratio a of usage of the BB84 protocol to usage of the SARG protocol is determined as a≦(L−m)/(M−m), a being a value other than 0 and 1, and the average number of photons is determined as μ×2/(1+a).

4. The quantum key distribution protocol as recited in claim 3 , wherein if the average number of photons in the pulse of the weak coherent light when the BB84 protocol is independently used is 0.1[photon/pulse], and if the average number of photons in the pulse of the weak coherent light when the SARG protocol is independently used is 0.2[photon/pulse], and if M=125 km, m=87.5 km, and n=100 km, the ratio a is determined as a≦(L−87.5)/(125−87.5), a being a value other than 0 and 1 and L being a value between 100 and 125 km, and the average number of photons is determined as 0.2/(1+a).

5. The quantum key distribution protocol as recited in claim 1 , wherein the two kinds of existing protocols use four quantum states throughout a range that is greater than zero and is less than M.

6. The quantum key distribution protocol as recited in claim 3 , wherein the two kinds of existing protocols use four quantum states throughout a range that is greater than zero and is less than M.

7. The quantum key distribution protocol as recited in claim 1 , wherein an average number of photons per pulse is restricted than that of the SARG protocol.

8. The quantum key distribution protocol as recited in claim 3 , wherein an average number of photons per pulse is restricted than that of the SARG protocol.

9. The quantum key distribution protocol as recited in claim 1 , wherein

when the communication distance is less than or equal to m, the SARG protocol is always used, m being the minimum distance at which a mutual information amount that can be acquired by an eavesdropper reduces more than when the BB84 protocol and the SARG protocol are each used independently, and

when the communication distance is greater than m, the BB84 protocol or the SARG protocol is used in accordance with the ratio.

10. The quantum key distribution protocol as recited in claim 3 , wherein

when the communication distance is less than or equal to m, the SARG protocol is always used, m being the minimum distance at which a mutual information amount that can be acquired by an eavesdropper reduces more than when the BB84 protocol and the SARG protocol are each used independently, and

when the communication distance is greater than m, the BB84 protocol or the SARG protocol is used in accordance with the ratio.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 26, 2007
From: IMAI, HIDEKI; HAGIWARA, MANABU; EGUCHI, MAKOTO
To: FOUNDATION FOR THE PROMOTION OF INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE, THE
Reel/Frame 019006/0986 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2004-253266 · Aug 31, 2004 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20080101612A1 · May 1, 2008