IP Library Granted Patent US 7,899,481
Granted Patent B2
US 7,899,481 · App. 11/688,129 · Granted Mar 1, 2011

Reference signal selection techniques for a wireless communication system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,899,481
App. No.
11/688,129
Granted
Mar 1, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A technique for improving link performance in a wireless communication system includes detecting whether subscriber stations in the wireless communication system are power-limited. The subscriber stations include at least a first subscriber station that is power-limited and a second subscriber station that is not power-limited. The technique assigns a first reference signal having a first cubic metric to the first subscriber station and a second reference signal having a second cubic metric to the second subscriber station. In this case, the first cubic metric is lower in magnitude than the second cubic metric.

Claims (38)

1. A method of improving link performance in a wireless network, comprising:

detecting whether subscriber stations in the wireless network are power-limited, the subscriber stations including a first subscriber station that is power-limited and a second subscriber station that is not power-limited; and

assigning a first reference signal having a first cubic metric to the first subscriber station and a second reference signal having a second cubic metric to the second subscriber station, wherein the first cubic metric is lower in magnitude than the second cubic metric.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detecting further comprises:

receiving respective feedback indicators from the subscriber stations; and

examining the respective feedback indicators to determine whether the subscriber stations are power-limited.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detecting further comprises:

determining respective carrier to interference and noise ratios associated with the subscriber stations; and

comparing the respective carrier to interference and noise ratios associated with the subscriber stations to a threshold to determine whether the subscriber stations are power-limited.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and second reference signals are included with a reference signal group and the method further comprises:

determining when one of the subscriber stations is more power-limited than another one of the subscriber stations;

reassigning, from a less power-limited one of the subscriber stations, a lower cubic metric reference signal, included with the reference signal group, to the more power-limited one of the subscriber stations; and

assigning a higher cubic metric reference signal, included within the reference signal group, to the less power-limited one of the subscriber stations, wherein the higher cubic metric reference signal has a higher associated cubic metric that the lower cubic metric reference signal.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting the first and second reference signals from a look-up table including multiple reference signals that are each correlated with a respective cubic metric.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on a transmitter power setting, whether one of the subscriber stations is power-limited; and

transmitting, from a power-limited one of the subscribers stations, a message including an asserted feedback indicator to a serving base station, the asserted feedback indicator indicating that the power-limited one of the subscriber stations is power-limited.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first subscriber station is substantially positioned at a cell-edge and the method further comprises:

transmitting, from the first subscriber station, the first reference signal at a first output power back-off level associated with the first reference signal.

8. A method of improving link performance in a wireless communication system, comprising:

receiving, at a serving base station, a first reference signal transmitted by a subscriber station during a first time period at a first output power back-off level associated with the first reference signal;

receiving, at the serving base station, a second reference signal transmitted by the subscriber station during a second time period at a second output power back-off level associated with the second reference signal, wherein the first and second reference signals have different cubic metrics; and

performing, at the serving base station, channel estimation for the subscriber station based on an average of the first and second reference signals.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the subscriber station is configured to repeat transmission of the first reference signal and the second reference signal while the subscriber station is active.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the subscriber station is substantially positioned at a cell-edge.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first time period corresponds to a first slot of an uplink subframe and the second time period corresponds to a second slot of the uplink subframe.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first time period corresponds to at least one first uplink subframe and the second time period corresponds to at least one second uplink subframe, and wherein the first and second uplink subframes are in different frames.

13. A wireless communication system, comprising:

multiple subscriber stations, the multiple subscriber stations including a first subscriber station that is power-limited and a second subscriber station that is not power-limited;

a base station in communication with the multiple subscriber stations, wherein the base station is configured to detect whether the multiple subscriber stations are power-limited; and

a scheduler in communication with the base station, wherein the scheduler is configured to assign a first reference signal having a first cubic metric to the first subscriber station and a second reference signal having a second cubic metric to the second subscriber station, and wherein the first cubic metric is lower in magnitude than the second cubic metric.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein base station is further configured to receive respective feedback indicators from the multiple subscriber stations and examine the respective feedback indicators to determine whether the multiple subscriber stations are power-limited.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the first and second reference signals are included within a reference signal group and the base station is further configured to determine when one of the multiple subscriber stations is more power-limited than another one of the multiple subscriber stations and the scheduler is further configured to reassign, from a less power-limited one of the multiple subscriber stations, a lower cubic metric reference signal, included with the reference signal group, to the more power-limited one of the multiple subscriber stations and assign a higher cubic metric reference signal, included within the reference signal group, to the less power-limited one of the multiple subscriber stations, wherein the higher cubic metric reference signal has a higher associated cubic metric that the lower cubic metric reference signal.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the scheduler is further configured to select the first and second reference signals from a look-up table including multiple reference signals that are each correlated with an associated cubic metric.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein each of the multiple subscriber stations is configured to determine, based on a respective transmitter power setting, whether it is power-limited, and wherein each of the multiple subscriber stations is further configured to transmit a message, including a feedback indicator, to the base station to indicate whether it is power-limited.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the first subscriber station is substantially located at a cell-edge and the first subscriber station is further configured to transmit the first reference signal at a first output power back-off level associated with the first reference signal.

19. The system of claim 13 , wherein the second subscriber station is substantially located at the base station and the second subscriber station is further configured to transmit the second reference signal at a second output power back-off level associated with the second reference signal.

Assignments (17)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040925 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Feb 17, 2020
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP, B.V. F/K/A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 052917/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040928 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Jan 17, 2020
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 052915/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037486 FRAME 0517. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS. Recorded Dec 10, 2019
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 053547/0421 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2016
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 040928/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2016
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP, B.V., F/K/A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 040925/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 12, 2016
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 037486/0517 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037354/0640 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037356/0143 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037356/0553 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 7, 2015
From: ZENITH INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: APPLE INC.
Reel/Frame 034749/0791 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 3, 2014
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: ZENITH INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 033677/0920 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 18, 2013
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 030633/0424 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 13, 2010
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 024397/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 15, 2010
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 024085/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 19, 2007
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 019847/0804 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2007
From: MCCOY, JAMES W.; CHEN, NING
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 019486/0966 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 19, 2007
From: MCCOY, JAMES W
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 019031/0637 →