IP Library Granted Patent US 7,499,784
Granted Patent B2
US 7,499,784 · App. 11/733,164 · Granted Mar 3, 2009

Method of selecting a transmission shift schedule

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,499,784
App. No.
11/733,164
Granted
Mar 3, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for selecting a shift schedule for a transmission in a motor vehicle is provided. The method includes the steps of determining whether a signal-to-noise ratio exceeds a threshold and calculating a tractive effort of the motor vehicle. A vehicle mass and a road grade is then estimated from the tractive effort using a recursive least squares estimator with multiple forgetting when the signal-to-noise ratio exceeds the threshold. A vehicle mass is selected and the road grade estimated from the vehicle mass and tractive effort when the signal-to-noise ratio does not exceed the threshold. A shift schedule is then selected based on the vehicle mass and the estimated road grade.

Claims (21)

1. A method for selecting a shift schedule for a transmission in a motor vehicle, the method comprising the steps of:

determining whether a signal-to-noise ratio exceeds a threshold;

calculating a tractive effort of the motor vehicle;

estimating a vehicle mass and a road grade from the tractive effort using a recursive least squares estimator with multiple forgetting when the signal-to-noise ratio exceeds the threshold;

selecting a vehicle mass and estimating the road grade from the vehicle mass and tractive effort when the signal-to-noise ratio does not exceed the threshold; and

selecting a shift schedule based on the vehicle mass and the estimated road grade.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the signal-to-noise ratio is an acceleration of the vehicle when an engine torque is not approximately zero.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the tractive effort is calculated from measured vehicle speed, measured engine torque, and transmission control signals.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the recursive least squares estimator includes forgetting factors that modify the vehicle mass and the road grade.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of estimating the vehicle mass and the road grade using the recursive least squares estimator includes varying the value of the forgetting factors based on the signal-to-noise ratio.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the recursive least squares estimator holds the road grade near constant and calculates the vehicle mass from the tractive effort when the motor vehicle is in a startup condition.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the startup condition begins when the vehicle is first started and ends when the engine and transmission temperatures increase to a pre-defined amount.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein the recursive least squares estimator accumulates tractive effort calculations over time, holds the road grade near constant, and calculates the vehicle mass from the tractive effort when the startup condition has ended.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the recursive least squares estimator accumulates tractive effort calculations over time, allows the road grade value to change, and allows the vehicle mass to change when the signal-to-noise ratio exceeds the threshold and the calculated vehicle mass is within an allowable limit.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the recursive least squares estimator accumulates tractive effort calculations over time, allows the road grade value to change, and holds the vehicle mass near constant when the signal-to-noise ratio exceeds the threshold, the calculated vehicle mass is within an allowable limit, and engine torque is above a calibrated value.

11. The method of claim 5 wherein the step of selecting a vehicle mass includes selecting a vehicle mass from the last vehicle mass calculated by the recursive least squares estimator when the signal-to-noise ratio exceeded the threshold.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of selecting a shift schedule includes selecting between an economy shift schedule and a performance shift schedule.

13. The method of claim 12 further comprising the step of calculating a road load mass factor from the vehicle mass, the road grade, and acceleration due to gravity prior to selecting a shift schedule.

14. The method of claim 13 further comprising the step of normalizing the road load mass factor and selecting a shift schedule based on the normalized road load mass factor.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein a performance shift schedule is selected when the vehicle mass and road grade are unknown.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein the signal-to-noise ratio is less than the threshold when the motor vehicle is braking.

Assignments (14)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034185/0587 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0035 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0057 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025314/0946 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0656 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0140 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0264 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023155/0663 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023124/0563 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022553/0540 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0610 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 14, 2009
From: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 022117/0047 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 19, 2008
From: KRESSE, JOHN P.
To: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 020523/0136 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2007
From: KRESSE, JOHN P.
To: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 019314/0510 →