IP Library Patent Application 11744471
Patent Application
App. No. 11/744,471

System and Method For Restricted Party Screening and Resolution Services

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
11/744,471
Abstract

A system and method for screening data for restricted party screening. The system comprises an input for entering data, a screening system for screening the data against a database comprising restricted entities information, generating a match score based on the screening of the data, providing a data match based on the match score, and outputting the data match, a work queue for reviewing the data match, and a report generated based on the review of the data match.

Claims (66)

1 . A system for screening data for restricted party screening comprising:

an input for entering data;

a screening system for screening the data against a database comprising restricted entities information, generating a match score based on the screening of the data, providing a data match based on the match score, and outputting the data match;

a work queue for reviewing the data match; and

a report generated based on the review of the data match.

2 . The system of claim 1 wherein the input comprises an interface for manual entry of data.

3 . The system of claim 1 wherein the input comprises an interface for flat-file data input.

4 . The system of claim 3 wherein the flat-file data is inputted by secure FTP.

5 . The system of claim 1 wherein the input comprises an interface for XML data input.

6 . The system of claim 1 wherein the restricted entities comprises information from at least one of commercial entities information, partners or customers information, government information, information from embargoes, or information based on a combination thereof.

7 . The system of claim 1 wherein the screening system comprises a database.

8 . The system of claim 7 wherein the database comprises at least one of a restricted entities database, customer or partner database, and an audit trail database.

9 . The system of claim 1 wherein the screening system further comprises a screening engine comprising at least one dictionary.

10 . The system of claim 9 wherein the screening engine further comprises a component for tokenization, a component for word token comparisons, and component for phrase match comparisons.

11 . The system of claim 10 wherein each of the components for tokenization, for word token comparisons, and for phrase match comparisons further comprises a tuning configuration.

12 . The system of claim 11 wherein the tuning configuration for the tokenization component further comprises at least one algorithm.

13 . The system of claim 12 wherein the at least one algorithm is at least an alphabetic n-gram, consonant n-gram, numeric n-gram, soundex, phonex, metaphone, or any combination thereof.

14 . The system of claim 9 wherein the screening system is configured to screen data in English.

15 . The system of claim 14 wherein the screening system further comprises a translation component for translating non-English language into English for screening data.

16 . The system of claim 15 wherein the translation component is provided by a machine.

17 . The system of claim 15 wherein the translation component is provided by a third party.

18 . The system of claim 9 wherein the screening system is configured to screen data in a non-English language.

19 . The system of claim 1 wherein the data match based on a match score yields at least one of a match, potential match, or no match.

20 . The system of claim 1 wherein the match score and data match are stored in a database.

21 . The system of claim 1 wherein the report is accessible through at least one of a user interface.

22 . The system of claim 21 wherein the report is viewed in a PDF format.

23 . The system of claim 21 wherein the report is viewed in a spreadsheet format.

24 . The system of claim 1 further comprising a match verification component for reviewing the report and generating a match verification decision.

25 . The system of claim 24 wherein the match verification decision is provided by a user.

26 . The system of claim 24 wherein the match verification decision is provided by a host agent.

27 . The system of claim 24 wherein the match verification decision is used for identifying a restricted party or black-listing.

28 . The system of claim 24 wherein the match verification decision is used for identifying a non-restricted party or white-listing.

29 . The system of claim 24 wherein the match verification decision is stored in a database.

30 . The system of claim 1 wherein the system is in a computer-executable format.

31 . The system of claim 1 wherein the system is accessed through a network.

32 . The system of claim 35 wherein the system is accessed through a web user interface.

33 . The system of claim 1 wherein the system has a hierarchical structure for a multi-level application.

34 . A method for screening data for restricted party screening comprising:

inputting data;

screening the data against a database comprising restricted entities information;

generating a match score based on the screening of the data;

providing a data match based on the match score;

outputting the data match;

reviewing the data match in a work queue; and

generating a report based on the review of the data match.

35 . A system for screening data comprising:

an input for entering data;

a screening system for screening the data against a database comprising restricted entities information, generating a match score based on the screening of the data, providing a data match based on the match score, and outputting the data match;

a match verification component for reviewing the data match and generating a match verification decision, wherein the match verification component is provided by a host agent and the match verification decision is based on the data match; and

a report generated based on the match verification decision.

36 . A method for screening data comprising:

inputting data;

screening the data against a database comprising restricted entities information;

generating a match score based on the screening of the data;

providing a data match based on the match score;

outputting the data match;

reviewing the data match by a match verification component to generate a match verification decision, wherein the match verification component is provided by a host agent and the match verification decision is based on the data match; and

generating a report based on the match verification decision.

37 . A method for screening data comprising:

inputting data;

screening the data against a database comprising restricted entities information;

generating a match score based on the screening of the data;

providing a data match based on the match score;

outputting the data match;

reviewing the data match by a match verification component to generate a match verification decision, wherein the match verification component is provided by a user and the match verification decision is based on the data match; and

generating a report based on the match verification decision.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2019
From: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
To: LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 049086/0539 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2019
From: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
To: LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 049086/0559 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2019
From: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
To: LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 049086/0526 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 24, 2013
From: LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS SECOND LIEN COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 030291/0231 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 23, 2013
From: LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS FIRST LIEN COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 030282/0904 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 24, 2012
From: LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
Reel/Frame 028629/0595 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 20, 2012
From: VASTERA, INC.
To: LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 028608/0445 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 19, 2012
From: JPMORGAN CHASE VASTERA INC.
To: VASTERA, INC.
Reel/Frame 028585/0482 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 13, 2012
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE VASTERA INC.
Reel/Frame 028546/0739 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2009
From: CHRISTENSEN, LARRY; WILSON, JAMES K.; LINSCOTT, WARREN M., JR.; SHETH, AMISH D.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 022296/0984 →