IP Library Granted Patent US 7,438,418
Granted Patent B2
US 7,438,418 · App. 11/818,260 · Granted Oct 21, 2008

Mental alertness and mental proficiency level determination

Assignee: EyeTracking, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,438,418
App. No.
11/818,260
Granted
Oct 21, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for determining mental proficiency level by monitoring point of gaze, pupillary movement, pupillary response, and other parameters in a subject performing a task, collecting the data in a database, analyzing the data in the database, and assigning the subject to a score indicating the subject's particular mental proficiency level in real time.

Claims (44)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining eye tracking data characterizing pupil dilation and point of gaze for an individual;

associating the data with one or more of a plurality of predefined mental proficiency levels, the predefined mental proficiency levels being derived from eye tracking data obtained from a plurality of individuals performing a substantially identical task, the plurality of predefined mental proficiency levels being generated by: providing a controlled setting characterized by one or more mental proficiency levels, subjecting one or more than one test individuals engaged in the task to the controlled setting, obtaining eye tracking data from the test individuals, performing calculations on the eye tracking data, and modeling the eye tracking data to describe the one or more mental proficiency levels;

identifying the associated predefined mental proficiency level to enable notification of the associated predefined mental proficiency level.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: performing a discriminant function analysis of the eye tracking data.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: performing a nonlinear classification analysis of the eye tracking data.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: selecting a defined job, task, or activity for the individual to participate in.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the defined job, task, or activity is selected from a group comprising: driving a vehicle; using a vehicle driving simulator; undertaking problem solving; or performing a visual search task.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the eye tracking data is selected from a group comprising pupil size, eyelid opening and closing speed, vertical eyelid separation distance, vertical location of the pupil, or horizontal location of the pupil.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein

the eye tracking data are subjected to an analysis comprising one or more of:

calculating an Index of Cognitive Activity (ICA);

calculating a blink rate;

calculating a movement of the pupil in a horizontal and in a vertical plane; and

calculating a divergence of the horizontal location of the pupil.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein

the mental proficiency level is selected from a group comprising: expert, intermediate, and novice.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data collection and analysis occur in real time.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data analysis is performed on pre-exsiting data.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring of pupils occurs at a frequency of up to about 1000 observations per second.

12. The method of claim 1 further comprising: monitoring eyes of one or more individuals.

13. The method of claim 1 further comprising: recording the eye tracking data.

14. The method of claim 1 further comprising: storing the eye tracking data.

15. The method of claim 1 further comprising: reporting the mental proficiency level of the one or more individuals.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising: alerting a third party to the mental proficiency level of the individual.

17. The method of claim 15 , further comprising: providing the individual with feedback identifying the mental proficiency level.

18. A method comprising:

obtaining eye tracking data characterizing pupil dilation and point of gaze for each eye of an individual;

calculating metrics based on the data comprising: index of cognitive activity, blink rate, rate of pupil movement, rate of change of point of gaze, and divergence between the point of gaze for each eye;

associating the metrics with one or more of at least two mental proficiency levels, the mental proficiency levels being derived from eye tracking data obtained from a plurality of individuals performing a substantially identical task in a controlled setting; and

identifying the associated predefined mental proficiency level to enable notification of the associated predefined mental proficiency level.

19. An apparatus comprising:

means for obtaining eye tracking data characterizing pupil dilation and point of gaze for an individual;

means for associating the eye tracking data with one or more of a plurality of predefined mental proficiency levels, the predefined mental proficiency levels being generated by providing a setting characterized by one or more mental proficiency levels, subjecting a plurality of test individuals engaged in a task to the setting, obtaining eye tracking data from the test individuals, performing calculations on the eye tracking data, and modeling the eye tracking data to describe the one or more mental proficiency levels; and

means for identifying the associated predefined mental proficiency level to enable notification of the associated predefined mental proficiency level.

20. A method comprising:

obtaining eye tracking data characterizing pupil dilation and point of gaze for an individual;

subjecting the eye tracking data to an analysis comprising one or more of:

calculating an Index of Cognitive Activity (ICA);

calculating a blink rate;

calculating a movement of the pupil in a horizontal and in a vertical plane; and

calculating a divergence of the horizontal location of the pupil;

associating the analyzed eye tracking data with one or more of a plurality of predefined mental proficiency levels; and

identifying the associated predefined mental proficiency level to enable notification of the associated predefined mental proficiency level.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: EYETRACKING, INC.
To: EYETRACKING LLC
Reel/Frame 049667/0371 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 12, 2007
From: MARSHALL, SANDRA PEERY
To: EYETRACKING, INC.
Reel/Frame 019516/0121 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 1136192300 · Feb 23, 2006
Provisional Application 6065584300 · Feb 23, 2005
Related Publication 20070291232A1 · Dec 20, 2007