IP Library Granted Patent US 7,652,614
Granted Patent B2
US 7,652,614 · App. 11/830,574 · Granted Jan 26, 2010

Ground clutter mitigation using a parametric time domain method

Assignee: Colorado State University Research Foundation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,652,614
App. No.
11/830,574
Granted
Jan 26, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems are disclosed for investigating a region of interest with a radar. A radar signal is propagated to the region of interest. Sampled time-domain radar data scattered within the region of interest are collected. A likelihood function is calculated with the sampled time-domain data within a parametric model of the region of interest for a defined set of parameters. The set of parameters in varied to find an extremum of the likelihood function.

Claims (307)

1. A method of investigating a region of interest with a radar, the method comprising:

propagating a radar signal to the region of interest;

generating a waveform with a uniform pulsing scheme or nonuniform pulsing scheme;

collecting sampled time-domain radar data scattered within the region of interest;

calculating a sample covariance matrix with the sampled time-domain data; and

calculating parameters of models that describe ground clutter, system noise, and weather signal, and that minimize a likelihood function calculated with the sample covariance matrix.

2. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the likelihood function is L(θ)=ln(|R(θ)|)+tr(R −1 (θ){circumflex over (R)} v ), where R is the covariance matrix having elements

R

[

k

,

l

]

=

P

p

exp

[

-

8

π

2

σ

p

2

(

k

-

l

)

2

T

s

2

λ

2

]

exp

[

-

j

4

π

v

_

(

k

-

l

)

T

s

λ

]

++

P

c

exp

[

-

8

π

2

σ

c

2

(

k

-

l

)

2

T

s

2

λ

2

]

+

2

T

s

λ

σ

N

2

δ

(

k

-

l

)

,

for

k

,

l

=

1

,

,

N

,

wherein:

T s is a measured signal sample;

λ is a wavelength of the radar signal;

j is √{square root over (−1)};

δ is a Kronecker function; and

the set of parameters comprises:

P p as a precipitation signal power;

σ p as a precipitation spectrum width;

v as a mean velocity of precipitation;

P p as a clutter power;

σ as a clutter spectrum width; and

σ N 2 as a noise power.

3. The method recited in claim 1 wherein collecting sampled time-domain radar data comprises collected time-domain radar data distributed nonuniformly in time.

4. The method recited in claim 3 wherein time spacings between subsequent collected time-domain radar data are substantially in a ratio of 2:3.

5. The method recited in claim 3 wherein time spacings between subsequent collected time-domain radar data are substantially in a ratio of 3:4.

6. A radar system for investigating a region of interest with a radar, the system comprising:

a radar source configured to propagate a radar signal;

a radar detector configured to collect radar data; and

a computational system in communication with the radar source and with the radar detector, the computational system comprising a processor and a memory coupled with the processor, the memory comprising a computer-readable medium having a computer-readable program embodied therein for direction operation of the radar system to investigate the region of interest, the computer-readable program including:

instructions for propagating the radar signal into the region of interest with the radar source;

instructions for generating a waveform with a uniform pulsing scheme or a nonuniform pulsing scheme with the radar source;

instructions for collecting sampled time-domain radar data scattered within the region of interest with the radar detector;

instructions for calculating sample covariance matrix with the sampled time-domain data; and

instructions for calculating parameters of models that describe ground clutter, system noise, and weather signal, and that minimize a likelihood function calculated with the sample covariance matrix.

7. The radar system recited in claim 6 wherein the likelihood function is L(θ)=ln(|R(θ)|)+tr(R −1 (θ){circumflex over (R)} v ), where R is the covariance matrix having elements

R

[

k

,

l

]

=

P

p

exp

[

-

8

π

2

σ

p

2

(

k

-

l

)

2

T

s

2

λ

2

]

exp

[

-

j

4

π

v

_

(

k

-

l

)

T

s

λ

]

++

P

c

exp

[

-

8

π

2

σ

c

2

(

k

-

l

)

2

T

s

2

λ

2

]

+

2

T

s

λ

σ

N

2

δ

(

k

-

l

)

,

for

k

,

l

=

1

,

,

N

,

wherein:

T s is a measured signal sample;

λ is a wavelength of the radar signal;

j is √{square root over (−1)};

σ is a Kronecker function; and

the set of parameters comprises:

P p as a precipitation signal power;

σ p as a precipitation spectrum width;

v as a mean velocity of precipitation;

P c b as a clutter power;

σ c as a clutter spectrum width; and

σ n 2 as a noise power.

8. The radar system recited in claim 6 wherein the instructions for collecting sampled time-domain radar data comprise instructions for collecting time-domain radar data distributed nonuniformly in time.

9. The radar system recited in claim 6 wherein time spacings between subsequent collected time-domain radar data are substantially in a ratio of 2:3.

10. The radar system recited in claim 6 , wherein time spacings between subsequent collected time-domain radar data are substantially in a ratio of 3:4.

11. The method recited in claim 1 wherein calculating the sample covariance matrix comprises calculating a sample covariance matrix representative of the data collected within the region of interest by averaging covariance matrices calculated for each data subset.

12. The method recited in claim 1 further comprising calculating final parameters of ground clutter, noise, and weather-echo parametric time domain models by finding an extremum of the likelihood function.

13. The method recited in claim 1 further comprising computing a normalized trace of product between sample covariance matrix and estimated covariance matrix.

14. The radar system recited in claim 6 wherein the instructions for calculating the sample covariance matrix comprise instructions for calculating a sample covariance matrix representative of the data collected within the region of interest by averaging covariance matrices calculated for each data subset.

15. The radar system recited in claim 6 wherein the computer-readable program further includes calculating final parameters of ground clutter, noise, and weather-echo parametric time domain models by finding an extremum of the likelihood function.

16. The radar system recited in claim 6 wherein the computer-readable program further includes computing a normalized trace of product between sample covariance matrix and estimated covariance matrix.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Aug 2, 2013
From: COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 030938/0666 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Mar 20, 2008
From: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
To: UNIVERSITY, COLORADO STATE
Reel/Frame 020686/0508 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 17, 2007
From: VENKATACHALAM, CHANDRASEKARAN; MOISEEV, DMITRIY; NGUYEN, CUONG
To: COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 019835/0648 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20090033542A1 · Feb 5, 2009