METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR RANKING IN EXPERT REFERRAL
Provided herein are methods and systems for expert referral and ranking. A method may comprise receiving an indicator related to an activity of an individual on behalf of at least one client; calculating a rank based upon the indicator; and associating the rank with the individual, wherein the rank provides a measure of the individual's value to a community of clients and wherein the indicator is based on the extent to which the individual has been engaged repeatedly.
1 . A method comprising:
receiving an indicator related to an activity of an individual on behalf of at least one client;
calculating a rank based upon the indicator; and
associating the rank with the individual, wherein the rank provides a measure of the individual's value to a community of clients and wherein the indicator is based on the extent to which the individual has been engaged repeatedly.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the indicator is based on the frequency of repeat engagement.
3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein engagement is by the same user.
4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein engagement is by multiple, non-correlated users.
5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein ranking is adjusted based on an indicator of an inconvenience.
6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the inconvenience is at least one of a time difference, a non-responsiveness, a location, and a cost.
7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the indicator is based on a frequency of engagement of an individual.
8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein engagement is by the same user.
9 . The method of claim 7 , wherein engagement is by multiple, non-correlated users.
10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the ranking based on an aspect of a speaking engagement.
11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the aspect is one or more of a size of the audience, publicity associated with the engagement, a web notice, and a number of references.
12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the ranking based on an aspect of publishing.
13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the aspect is at least one of publicity, a web notice, and a number of references.
14 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the ranking based on a credential.
15 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the ranking based on an aspect of an advisory board membership.
16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the aspect is at least one of the market cap of company, the market share of the company, and the company's rank in the Fortune 500.
17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the indicator is an indication of a value of an interaction between the individual and a client in the community.
18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the indication is an implicit indication.
19 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the ranking based on a nomination.
20 . The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating involves the use of a heuristic.
21 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising designating a status to the individual as a function of the rank.
22 . The method of claim 21 , wherein the status depends upon the rank in relation to other ranks that are associated with other individuals.
23 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising highlighting the individual in a communication depending upon the rank.
24 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying the individual to a client depending upon the rank.
25 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a reward to the individual as a function of the rank.
26 . The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating involves weighting at least two indicators to determine the ranking.
27 . The method of claim 26 , wherein weighting involves assigning a score to an indicator.
28 . The method of claim 26 , wherein the indicator is at least one of repeat engagement of an individual by a single user, repeat engagement of an individual by non-correlated users, a frequency of engagement of an individual, a frequency of engagement of an individual by a single user, a frequency of engagement of an individual by non-correlated users, an increasing frequency of engagement of an individual, an increasing frequency of engagement of an individual by a single user, an increasing frequency of engagement of an individual by non-correlated users, a number of non-correlated users engaging an individual, a number of users engaging an individual, a number of repeat users engaging an individual, a number of articles published, a journal where an article is published, a citation to an article, a speaking engagement, a number of speaking engagements, an aspect of a speaking engagement, a conference attendance, an advisory board membership, an aspect of an advisory board membership, a position at a company, an award, a prestige of an award, a number of grants, a value of grants, an educational level, an educational institution attended, a level of education, a credential, a number of previous engagements, a number of previous engagements for an individual client, a number of clients per time period, a number of current engagements, a feedback rating, an amount earned, a demand for an expert, a supply, a referral to the expert network, a screening of projects for suitability and potential conflicts, an abiding by the terms and conditions for experts, a profile update, a participation in events, an availability, a publication rate, a citation rate, a current academic status, a current employment status, and a number of invited lectures.
29 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising automatically modifying a ranking based on a change in at least one indicator.
30 . The method of claim 1 , wherein an individual can improve their ranking by at least one of updating their professional profile with pertinent information, taking advantage of and being responsive to opportunities for which they are qualified, staying up to date on key issues in their field, providing the best information they can and being as helpful as possible to clients, and by following designated guidelines.
31 . The method of claim 1 , wherein an individual ranking above a certain threshold qualifies for membership in a qualification group.
32 . The method of claim 31 , wherein membership in a qualification group is maintained by engaging in a threshold fraction of proposed, non-conflicted engagements per time period.
33 . The method of claim 31 , wherein membership in a qualification group obliges an individual to exclusivity.
34 . The method of claim 31 , wherein an individual requires consent to confirm their qualification.
35 . The method of claim 31 , wherein an individual receives at least one benefit associated with a qualification group.
36 . The method of claim 35 , wherein the benefit is at least one of status and recognition through status flags displayed in a communication; continued eligibility for certain programs and events; unrestricted consultative relationships with clients; invitations to networking events; access to industry research through education seminars, newsletters, forums, and peer-to-peer consultations; an uncapped potential compensation; and marketing to clients.
37 . The method of claim 1 , wherein an individual can opt out of being accessed for ranking.
38 . The method of claim 1 , wherein an individual receives at least one benefit associated with a ranking.
39 . The method of claim 38 , wherein the benefit is at least one of status and recognition through status flags displayed in a communication; continued eligibility for certain programs and events; unrestricted consultative relationships with clients; invitations to networking events; access to industry research through education seminars, newsletters, forums, and peer-to-peer consultations; an uncapped potential compensation; and marketing to clients.
40 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the ranking is based on at least two indicia related to engagement of the individual with clients, wherein each of the indicia is assigned a score, wherein the scores are normalized to allow for a ranking based on the normalized scores.
41 . The method of claim 40 , wherein the indicia are at least one of repeat access of an individual by a single user, repeat access of an individual by non-correlated users, a frequency of access of an individual, a frequency of access of an individual by a single user, a frequency of access of an individual by non-correlated users, an increasing frequency of access of an individual, an increasing frequency of access of an individual by a single user, an increasing frequency of access of an individual by non-correlated users, a number of non-correlated users accessing an individual, a number of users accessing an individual, a number of repeat users accessing an individual, a number of articles published, a journal where an article is published, a citation to an article, a speaking engagement, a number of speaking engagements, an aspect of a speaking engagement, a conference attendance, an advisory board membership, an aspect of an advisory board membership, a position at a company, an award, a prestige of an award, a number of grants, a value of grants, an educational level, an educational institution attended, a level of education, a credential, a number of previous engagements, a number of previous engagements for an individual client, a number of clients per time period, a number of current engagements, a feedback rating, an amount earned, a demand for an expert, a supply, a referral to the expert network, a screening of projects for suitability and potential conflicts, an abiding by the terms and conditions for experts, a profile update, a participation in events, an availability, a publication rate, a citation rate, a current academic status, a current employment status, and a number of invited lectures.