IP Library Granted Patent US 9,269,244
Granted Patent B2
US 9,269,244 · App. 11/844,759 · Granted Feb 23, 2016

Event detection based on video metadata

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,269,244
App. No.
11/844,759
Granted
Feb 23, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Video data from sources, such as cameras, is analyzed to create metadata descriptive of the events and objects occurring in the video. This metadata, which consists of data about the video, is then analyzed on a transaction basis to determine if a suspicious activity, such as a fraudulent Point of Sale (POS) return event, has occurred in relation to a transaction.

Claims (22)

1. A system for identifying possible fraudulent activity in connection with a transaction which occurred at point-of-sale (POS) device, an employee region of interest and a customer region of interest being associated with the POS device, the system comprising at least one or more programmed processors and one or more storage devices cooperating to: identify video metadata corresponding to activity which took place in the customer and employee regions of interest during a time period related to the transaction; based on the examination of the metadata, being configured to: determine whether a customer was located in the customer region of interest during the time period, the determination including: (i) identifying a set of objects, if any, in the customer region of interest which meet predetermined criteria; and (ii) excluding from that set of objects one or more objects as a function of whether they are also located in the employee region of interest; wherein the excluding includes: determining a percentage of surface area overlap, of the one or more objects of interest from the set of objects, between the customer region of interest and the employee region of interest and using the percentage information to determine in which region the one or more objects is located.

2. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the video metadata includes information descriptive of objects, if any, located in the customer and employee regions of interest during the time period.

3. A system according to claim 2 , wherein the video metadata includes information relating to one or more of the position, relative size, and movements of the one or more objects located in the customer and employee regions of interest during the time period.

4. A system according to claim 2 , wherein the video metadata includes information relating to at least the position, relative size, and movements of the one or more objects located in the customer and employee regions of interest during the time period.

5. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors and one or more storage devices also cooperate to post a report of possible fraud at the POS device when a defined set of conditions relating to the set of objects is met.

6. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the POS device is a cashier terminal.

7. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors and one or more storage devices also cooperate to allow the user of the system to select the length of the time period.

8. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the video metadata is time stamped and the system identifies the video metadata corresponding to activity which took place in the customer and employee regions of interest during the time period as a function of the time stamps.

9. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the determination of whether a customer was located in the customer region of interest during the time period is made, at least in part, by determining whether one or more of the objects were within a predetermined sub region of the customer region of interest.

10. A system according to claim 9 , wherein the determination of whether a customer was located in the customer region of interest during the time period is made, at least in part, by determining whether one or more of the objects were within the customer region of interest for at least a predetermined subset of the time period.

11. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the determination of whether a customer was located in the customer region of interest during the time period is made, at least in part, by determining whether one or more of the objects were within the customer region of interest for at least a predetermined subset of the time period.

12. A method for identifying possible fraudulent activity in connection with a transaction which occurred at point-of-sale (POS) device, an employee region of interest and a customer region of interest being associated with the POS device, the method being carried out by a system comprising at least one or more programmed processors and one or more storage devices, the method comprising: the system identifying video metadata corresponding to activity which took place in the customer and employee regions of interest during a time period related to the transaction; based on the examination of the metadata, being configured to: the system determining whether a customer was located in the customer region of interest during the time period, the determination including: (i) identifying a set of objects, if any, in the customer region of interest which meet predetermined criteria; and (ii) excluding from that set of objects one or more of the objects as a function of whether they are also located in the employee region of interest; wherein the excluding includes: determining a percentage of surface area overlap, of the one or more objects of interest from the set of objects, between the customer region of interest and the employee region of interest and using the percentage information to determine in which region the one or more objects is located.

13. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the video metadata includes information descriptive of objects, if any, located in the customer and employee regions of interest during the time period.

14. A method according to claim 13 , wherein the video metadata includes information relating to one or more of the position, relative size, and movements of the one or more objects located in the customer and employee regions of interest during the time period.

15. A method according to claim 13 , wherein the video metadata includes information relating to at least the position, relative size, and movements of the one or more objects located in the customer and employee regions of interest during the time period.

16. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors and one or more storage devices also cooperate carry out the step of posting a report of possible fraud at the POS device when a defined set of conditions relating to the set of objects is met.

17. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the POS device is a cashier terminal.

18. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the length of the time period is selected by the user of the system.

19. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the video metadata is time stamped and the step of identifying the video metadata corresponding to activity which took place in the customer and employee regions of interest during the time period as a function of the time stamps.

20. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the determination of whether a customer was located in the customer region of interest during the time period is made, at least in part, by determining whether one or more of the objects were within a predetermined sub region of the customer region of interest.

21. A method according to claim 20 , wherein the determination of whether a customer was located in the customer region of interest during the time period is made, at least in part, by determining whether one or more of the objects were within the customer region of interest for at least a predetermined subset of the time period.

22. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the determination of whether a customer was located in the customer region of interest during the time period is made, at least in part, by determining whether one or more of the objects were within the customer region of interest for at least a predetermined subset of the time period.

Assignments (9)
NOTICE OF PARTIAL TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Oct 17, 2022
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: COGNYTE SOFTWARE LTD. (AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO VERINT AMERICAS INC.)
Reel/Frame 061686/0615 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 15, 2022
From: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
To: COGNYTE TECHNOLOGIES ISRAEL LTD
Reel/Frame 061435/0362 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Jul 21, 2017
From: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 043293/0567 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 30, 2017
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
Reel/Frame 043066/0318 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2016
From: VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
To: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
Reel/Frame 037724/0507 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Oct 21, 2013
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: VERINT AMERICAS INC.; VERINT SYSTEMS INC.; VERINT VIDEO SOLUTIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 031448/0373 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Oct 21, 2013
From: VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 031465/0314 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 2, 2011
From: VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 026208/0727 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2007
From: HEIER, KURT; O'DELL, JOSH; LEGENDRE, JON; SHOAF, DEREK
To: VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
Reel/Frame 020073/0967 →