IP Library Granted Patent US 8,065,261
Granted Patent B2
US 8,065,261 · App. 12/081,352 · Granted Nov 22, 2011

Methods and system to compare different options in a decision making process

Assignee: KSMI Decisions LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,065,261
App. No.
12/081,352
Granted
Nov 22, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of comparing a plurality of decision options is provided. The method can include entering a plurality of factors; determining a plurality of decision options based on the plurality of factors; calculating a score for the plurality of factors; ranking each decision option based on the total score of each factor; outputting the rankings for each decision option.

Claims (39)

1. A method of comparing a plurality of decision options, said method implemented on a computing device programmable to perform the steps comprising:

entering a plurality of factors;

determining a plurality of decision options based on the plurality of factors through a search of a database by an engine;

calculating a numeric value for the plurality of factors based on the plurality of factors received, the plurality of decision options determined and the information obtained from the search of the database;

calculating a weighted score for each factor of each decision option;

ranking each decision option based on the total score of each factor; and

outputting the rankings for each decision option.

2. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising entering factor data for each of the factors.

3. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising calculating a numeric value for each of the factors.

4. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising entering an importance level for each of the factors.

5. A method in accordance with claim 4 further comprising calculating a weighted score for each of the factors based on the importance level for each of the factors.

6. A method in accordance with claim 5 further comprising calculating a total score for each decision option based on the weighted score of each of the factors.

7. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the plurality of decision options include at least one of a plurality of products and services.

8. A computer program embodied on one of non-volatile or volatile media comprising at least one code segment configured to instruct a computer to:

receive a plurality of factors;

determine a plurality of decision options based on the plurality of factors through a search of a database by an engine;

calculate a numeric value for the plurality of factors based on the plurality of factors received, the plurality of decision options determined and the information obtained from the search of the database;

calculate a weighted score for each factor of each decision option;

rank the plurality of decision options based on the total score of each factor; and

output the rank of the plurality of decision options.

9. A computer program in accordance with claim 8 wherein the computer program further comprises at least one code segment configured to receive an importance level for each of the factors.

10. A computer program in accordance with claim 9 wherein the computer program further comprises at least one code segment configured to calculate a weighted score for each of the factors based on the importance level of each of the factors.

11. A computer program in accordance with claim 10 wherein the computer program further comprises at least one code segment configured to calculate a total score for each decision option based on the weighted score of each of the factors.

12. A computer program in accordance with claim 8 wherein the computer program further comprises at least one code segment configured to receive factor data for each of the factors.

13. A computer program in accordance with claim 8 wherein the computer program further comprises at least one code segment configured to calculate a numeric value for each of the factors.

14. A decision making system comprising:

at least one server coupled in communication with at least one first party and at least one second party, the at least one server is configured to:

receive a plurality of factors;

determine a plurality of decision options based on the plurality of factors through a search of a database by an engine;

calculate a numeric value for the plurality of factors based on the plurality of factors received, the plurality of decision options determined and the information obtained from the search of the database;

calculate a weighted score for each factor of each decision option;

rank the plurality of decision options based on the total score of the plurality of factors of each decision option; and

output the rank of the plurality of decision options.

15. A decision making system in accordance with claim 14 wherein the server is further configured to calculate a numeric value for each of the factors.

16. A decision making system in accordance with claim 14 wherein the server is further configured to receive factor data for each of the factors.

17. A decision making system in accordance with claim 14 wherein the server is further configured to determine a plurality of decision options that include at least one of a plurality of products and services.

18. A decision making system in accordance with claim 14 wherein the server is further configured to receive an importance level of each of the factors.

19. A decision making system in accordance with claim 18 wherein the server is further configured to calculate a weighted score for each of the factors based on the importance level for each of the factors.

20. A decision making system in accordance with claim 19 wherein the server is further configured to calculate a total score for each decision option based on the weighted score of each of the factors.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2023
From: DSIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: FOUR CHARM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 062974/0038 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2020
From: DSIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: FOUR CHARM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 053750/0265 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 19, 2015
From: KSMI DECISIONS, LLC
To: DSIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 036886/0704 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 4, 2014
From: KELLOGG, RAWDON; BATHURST, JAMES
To: DSIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 034377/0187 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2008
From: KELLOGG, RODNEY; BATHURST, JAMES; BUEHRLE, JEFFREY; MIKELL, DONALD; SOLLIE, GREGORY; SOLLIE, SHARON
To: KSMI DECISIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 021072/0039 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 60935650 · Aug 23, 2007
Related Publication 20090055337A1 · Feb 26, 2009