IP Library Granted Patent US 8,054,039
Granted Patent B2
US 8,054,039 · App. 12/340,079 · Granted Nov 8, 2011

System and method for charging a plug-in electric vehicle

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,054,039
App. No.
12/340,079
Granted
Nov 8, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A battery charging system and method for charging a plug-in electric vehicle with power from an external power source, such as a standard 110 volt or 220 volt AC wall outlet. The method senses various internal and external conditions and uses this information to charge the plug-in electric vehicle in an optimum fashion that reduces charging time yet avoids damage to components of the charging system. In one embodiment, the battery charging system includes an external power source, a battery charger with sensors for monitoring the external power source and the charger, a battery unit with sensors for monitoring the battery, a battery charging control module for processing the information, and a user interface that allows user-specified custom charging constraints. All of these components, with the exception of external power source, may be located on the vehicle.

Claims (32)

1. A method for charging a plug-in electric vehicle, comprising the steps of:

(a) sensing at least one condition pertaining to an external power source, a battery charger located on the plug-in electric vehicle, or a battery unit located on the plug-in electric vehicle, wherein the sensed condition is at least partially based on an unloaded voltage of the external power source which is measured when the external power source is in an unloaded state and there is little or no current being drawn from the external power source by the battery charger located on the plug-in electric vehicle;

(b) determining a charging control signal based on the sensed condition that is at least partially based on an unloaded voltage of the external power source; and

(c) charging the battery unit with the battery charger, wherein the battery charger is operated according to the charging control signal and the charging control signal is periodically adjusted in response to changes in the sensed condition.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (a) further comprises sensing at least one condition that pertains to the external power source and is selected from the group consisting of: droop voltage in the external power source, current draw from the external power source, power loss in a power coupling, power draw from the external power source, or minimum voltage of the external power source.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (a) further comprises sensing at least one condition that pertains to the battery charger and is selected from the group consisting of: charger temperature, charger voltage, or charger current.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (a) further comprises sensing at least one condition that pertains to the battery unit and is selected from the group consisting of: battery temperature, battery voltage, battery current, battery state of charge (SOC), or battery state of health (SOH).

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (b) further comprises determining the charging control signal by using closed-loop control to: i) compare the sensed condition to a setpoint to obtain an error value, ii) multiply the error value by a gain value to obtain a product, and iii) use the product to obtain the charging control signal.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein step (b)(i) allows a user-specified setpoint in order to enable the user to control one or more constraints on the charging process.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the user-specified setpoint pertains to the maximum amount of current that can be drawn from the external power source.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the user-specified setpoint pertains to the maximum amount of power that can be drawn from the external power source.

9. The method of claim 5 , wherein step (b)(i) allows a negative error value in order to address overshoot by the method.

10. The method of claim 5 , wherein step (b) uses proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control to obtain the charging control signal.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (c) further comprises operating the battery charger according to the charging control signal, and the charging control signal uses pulse width modulation (PWM) to vary the amount of current that is provided by the battery charger to the battery unit.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of:

evaluating one or more fault conditions and if a fault condition is detected, then stopping the charging process.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of:

generating a diagnostic trouble code (DTC) that provides information regarding the sensed condition.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

putting the external power source in an unloaded state where there is little or no current being drawn from the external power source by the battery charger; and

periodically sampling the unloaded voltage of the external power source and using the unloaded voltage of the external power source to make at least one calculation selected from the group consisting of: droop voltage in the external power source, power loss in a power coupling, power draw from the external power source, or minimum voltage of the external power source.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (a) further comprises sensing a plurality of conditions pertaining to the external power source, the battery charger, or the battery unit, step (b) further comprises evaluating the plurality of sensed conditions, determining corresponding constraints for each of the plurality of sensed conditions, and determining the charging control signal based on the most restrictive of the plurality of constraints, and step (c) further comprises operating the battery charger according to the charging control signal which is representative of the most restrictive constraint, wherein at least one of the plurality of conditions is at least partially based on an unloaded battery charger input voltage.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plug-in electric vehicle is a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) and the external power source is an alternating current (AC) wall outlet.

17. A method for charging a plug-in electric vehicle, comprising the steps of:

(a) sensing a plurality of conditions pertaining to an external power source, a battery charger, and/or a battery unit, wherein at least one of the plurality of conditions is a droop voltage that generally represents the difference between an unloaded voltage of the external power source and a loaded voltage of the external power source, wherein the unloaded voltage is measured when the external power source is in an unloaded state and there is little or no current being drawn from the external power source by the battery charger, and the loaded voltage is measured when the external power source is in a loaded state and there is some current being drawn from the external power source by the battery charger;

(b) evaluating each of the sensed conditions with a particular battery charging constraint;

(c) reviewing each of the evaluations and identifying the most-restrictive constraint, wherein the most-restrictive constraint is the one that requests the least amount of current from the battery charger; and

(d) operating the battery charger so that it does not violate the most-restrictive constraint.

18. A system for charging a plug-in electric vehicle, comprising:

a battery charger being located on the plug-in electric vehicle and having an input coupled to an external power source, an output coupled to a battery unit, and one or more sensor(s) for monitoring external power source conditions and/or battery charger conditions;

a battery unit being located on the plug-in electric vehicle and having an input coupled to the battery charger and one or sensor(s) for monitoring battery conditions; and

a battery charging control module being located on the plug-in electric vehicle and being coupled to both the battery charger and the battery unit, wherein the battery charging control module receives readings from the battery charger sensor(s) and the battery sensor(s) and uses those readings to control the output power that the battery charger provides the battery unit, and one of the readings that is used in the control of the output power is an unloaded voltage reading for the external power source which is representative of the external power source when it is in an unloaded state and there is little or no current being drawn from the external power source by the battery charger.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034185/0789 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0245 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0515 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025315/0046 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0909 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0237 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0313 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023126/0914 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023155/0769 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022554/0538 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 3, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0363 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 29, 2008
From: BAUERLE, PAUL A.; NEWHOUSE, VERNON L.; WOLAK, JEFFREY T.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 022031/0441 →