IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,188,416
Granted Patent B2
US 8,188,416 · App. 12/353,725 · Granted May 29, 2012

Engineered phantoms for perfusion imaging applications

Assignee: The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,188,416
App. No.
12/353,725
Granted
May 29, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

In various embodiments, microengineered phantoms with microvascular networks serve as calibration standards for perfusion imaging systems.

Claims (28)

1. A method for improving image-based characterization of perfusion in microvascular networks, comprising the steps of:

(a) perfusing a phantom comprising an artificial microvascular network of known structure and dimensions with a fluid;

(b) selecting a perfusion parameter and determining, based on the known structure and dimensions of the network, a first value of the selected perfusion parameter;

(c) inducing contrast in a portion of the fluid present in the artificial microvascular network;

(d) acquiring a series of images of the phantom in accordance with an imaging scheme;

(e) computing from the series of images a second value for the selected perfusion parameter based on an analysis scheme; and

(f) varying at least one of the imaging scheme or the analysis scheme based on a comparison of the first and second values.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the imaging scheme is varied, and further comprising characterizing perfusion in a second microvascular network by (i) acquiring a series of images in accordance with the varied imaging scheme and (ii) computing from the series of images a second perfusion parameter.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the second microvascular network is a biological microvascular network.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the analysis scheme is varied, and further comprising characterizing perfusion in a second microvascular network by (i) acquiring a series of images and (ii) computing from the series of images a second perfusion parameter based on the varied analysis scheme.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the second microvascular network is a biological microvascular network.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein step (f) comprises varying a variable parameter of the analysis scheme so as to reduce a difference between the first and second values.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising computing a third value for the selected perfusion parameter from the series of images based on an alternative analysis scheme, and, if a difference between the first value and the third value is smaller than a difference between the first value and the second value, substituting the analysis scheme with the alternative analyses scheme.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the analysis scheme comprises at least one of distributed parameter analysis, Patlak analysis, deconvolution, dynamic contrast enhancement analysis, or dynamic susceptibility contrast analysis.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the perfusion parameter is selected from the group consisting of a fluid volume, a flow rate, a mean transit time, a permeability, a diffusion constant, a transfer constant, a peak flow rate, a rise time, a rise slope, a decay time, a decay slope, and a recirculation rate.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein step (d) comprises employing at least one of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, single photon emissions computed tomography, or acoustic imaging.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the imaging scheme is varied by adjusting image acquisition settings.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein step (c) comprises injecting a contrast agent into the fluid.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein step (c) comprises injecting a known bolus of contrast agent.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein step (c) comprises imparting a magnetic polarization on a portion of the fluid.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein the dimensions of every structural feature in the artificial microvascular network are each known within a tolerance of five percent.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein the phantom is designed for at least one of a specific tissue or a specific patient.

17. The method of claim 1 wherein the phantom further comprises a three-dimensional compartment and a membrane separating the compartment from the artificial microvascular network.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein each cross-sectional dimension of the compartment is greater than a cross-sectional dimension of a microchannel of the artificial microvascular network.

19. A method for characterizing perfusion in a biological microvascular network, comprising the steps of:

(a) calibrating a perfusion imaging system comprising an imaging apparatus and an image analysis module by (i) perfusing a phantom comprising an artificial microvascular network of known structure and dimensions with a fluid; (ii) selecting a perfusion parameter and determining, based on the known structure and dimensions of the network, a first value of the selected perfusion parameter; (iii) inducing contrast in a portion of the fluid present in the artificial microvascular network; (iv) acquiring a series of images of the phantom with the imaging apparatus in accordance with an imaging scheme; (v) computing from the series of images a second value for the selected perfusion parameter based on an analysis scheme employed by the image analysis module; and (vi) varying at least one of the imaging scheme or the analysis scheme based on a comparison of the first and second values;

(b) inducing contrast in a portion of a fluid present in the biological microvascular network, and acquiring a series of images of the biological microvascular network with the imaging apparatus; and

(c) computing a perfusion parameter of the biological microvascular network with the image analysis module.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2009
From: BORENSTEIN, JEFFREY T.
To: THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC.
Reel/Frame 023185/0353 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2009
From: PIEN, HOMER; KALRA, MANNUDEEP
To: THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 023185/0356 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61020848 · Jan 14, 2008
Related Publication 20090316972A1 · Dec 24, 2009