Frequency planning optimization for mobile communications
Technologies for optimizing frequency allocations in mobile communication systems can include a probabilistic model that can consider interference quality, coverage quality, frequency hop set length, service type, environment, and mobile radio speed. A frame erasure rate (FER) objective for call quality may be used as a key performance metric as FER performance can be closely related to voice quality. Mobile allocation list (MAL) length selection during the optimization can attempt to optimize the MAL length at the sector level. Choosing a MAL length per cell can provide an additional degree of freedom during the optimization process. The model can consider signal quality of neighbor cells in handover areas. The model can trade off co-channel and adjacent channel interference. Co-channel interference can be reduced at the expense of adjacent channel interference.
1. A computer-implemented method for frequency planning within a mobile wireless communications network, the method comprising computer-implemented operations for:
determining a plurality of frequency plans for the mobile wireless communications network, each of the frequency plans comprising a frequency allocation model representing allocation of frequencies at locations within the wireless communications network;
determining a frame erasure rate performance metric for each of at least two of the frequency plans, the frame erasure rate performance metric being based upon a number of frames erased during a period of time from a data stream associated with a communications channel of the wireless communications network;
determining, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a second order broadcast control channel performance metric associated with the frequency plan;
comparing the at least two frequency plans based, at least partially, upon the frame erasure rate performance metrics and the second order broadcast control channel performance metrics associated with the frequency plans; and
identifying a preferred frequency plan based, at least partially, upon the comparing.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein
determining the second order broadcast control channel performance metric comprises identifying two cells, determining a handover point between the two cells, determining a carrier to interference ratio at the handover point, and identifying a probability of decoding a base station identification correctly at the handover point based, at least partially, upon the carrier to interference ratio at the handover point, and wherein
comparing the second order broadcast control channel performance metrics associated with the frequency plans comprises comparing probabilities of decoding the base station identification correctly at the handover point associated with each of the frequency plans.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein comparing the at least two frequency plans further comprises
determining, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a traffic channel performance metric associated with a traffic channel between two neighbor cells, and
comparing the traffic channel performance metrics associated with each of the at least two frequency plans.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the frame erasure rate performance metric is further based upon a handover failure rate associated with the frequency plan.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the at least two frequency plans further comprises
determining, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a mobile allocation list length specifying a frequency hop set length for each of two or more cells, and
comparing the mobile allocation list lengths associated with each of the at least two frequency plans.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the at least two frequency plans further comprises determining, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a probability that the frame erasure rate exceeds a threshold rate.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the frame erasure rate performance metric is further based upon frame erasure due to coverage quality and frame erasure due to interference.
8. A computer storage medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon which, when executed by a computer system, cause the computer system to:
determine a plurality of frequency plans for a wireless communications network, each of the frequency plans comprising a frequency allocation model representing allocation of frequencies at locations within the wireless communications network;
determine a frame erasure rate performance metric for each of at least two of the frequency plans, the frame erasure rate performance metric being based upon a number of frames erased during a period of time from a data stream associated with a communications channel of the wireless communications network;
determine, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a second order broadcast control channel performance metric associated with the frequency plan;
compare the at least two frequency plans based, at least partially, upon the frame erasure rate performance metrics and the second order broadcast control channel performance metrics associated with the frequency plans; and
identify a preferred frequency plan based, at least partially, upon the comparing.
9. The computer storage medium of claim 8 , wherein
determining the second order broadcast control channel performance metric comprises identifying two cells, determining a handover point between the two cells, determining a carrier to interference ratio at the handover point, and identifying a probability of decoding a base station identification correctly at the handover point based, at least partially, upon the carrier to interference ratio at the handover point, and wherein
comparing the second order broadcast control channel performance metrics associated with the frequency plans comprises comparing probabilities of decoding the base station identification correctly at the handover point associated with each of the frequency plans.
10. The computer storage medium of claim 9 , wherein comparing the at least two frequency plans further comprises
determining, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a traffic channel performance metric associated with a traffic channel between two neighbor cells, and
comparing the traffic channel performance metrics associated with each of the at least two frequency plans.
11. The computer storage medium of claim 8 , wherein the frame erasure rate performance metric is further based upon a handover failure rate associated with the frequency plan.
12. The computer storage medium of claim 8 , wherein comparing the at least two frequency plans further comprises
determining, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a mobile allocation list length specifying a frequency hop set length for each of two or more cells, and
comparing the mobile allocation list lengths associated with each of the at least two frequency plans.
13. The computer storage medium of claim 8 , wherein comparing the at least two frequency plans further comprises determining, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a probability that the frame erasure rate exceeds a threshold rate.
14. The computer storage medium of claim 8 , wherein the frame erasure rate performance metric is further based upon frame erasure due to coverage quality and frame erasure due to interference.
15. A frequency planning system comprising:
a frequency planning controller;
one or more interfaces between the frequency planning controller and a wireless communications network;
a processing unit associated with the frequency planning controller; and
a module for execution on the processing unit, the module comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processing unit, cause the frequency planning controller to
determine a plurality of frequency plans for the wireless communications network, each of the frequency plans comprising a frequency allocation model representing allocation of frequencies at locations within the wireless communications network,
determine a frame erasure rate performance metric for each of at least two of the frequency plans, the frame erasure rate performance metric being based upon a number of frames erased during a period of time from a data stream associated with a communications channel of the wireless communications network,
determine, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a second order broadcast control channel performance metric associated with the frequency plan,
compare the at least two frequency plans based, at least partially, upon the frame erasure rate performance metrics and the second order broadcast control channel performance metrics associated with the frequency plans, and
identify a preferred frequency plan based, at least partially, upon the comparing.
16. The frequency planning system of claim 15 , wherein
determining the second order broadcast control channel performance metric comprises identifying two cells, determining a handover point between the two cells, determining a carrier to interference ratio at the handover point, and identifying a probability of decoding a base station identification correctly at the handover point based, at least partially, upon the carrier to interference ratio at the handover point, and wherein
comparing the second order broadcast control channel performance metrics associated with the frequency plans comprises comparing probabilities of decoding the base station identification correctly at the handover point associated with each of the frequency plans.
17. The frequency planning system of claim 16 , wherein comparing the at least two frequency plans further comprises
determining, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a traffic channel performance metric associated with a traffic channel between two neighbor cells, and
comparing the traffic channel performance metrics associated with each of the at least two frequency plans.
18. The frequency planning system of claim 15 , wherein the frame erasure rate performance metric is further based upon a handover failure rate associated with the frequency plan.
19. The frequency planning system of claim 15 , wherein comparing the at least two frequency plans comprises
determining, for each of the at least two frequency plans, a mobile allocation list length specifying a frequency hop set length for each of two or more cells, and
comparing the mobile allocation list lengths associated with each of the at least two frequency plans.
20. The frequency planning system of claim 15 , wherein the frame erasure rate performance metric is further based upon frame erasure due to coverage quality and frame erasure due to interference.