IP Library Granted Patent US 8,521,123
Granted Patent B2
US 8,521,123 · App. 12/398,813 · Granted Aug 27, 2013

System and method for authoritative validation of mobile service permissions

Inventors: Andrew Cook (Lenexa, KS); Jade Kerr (Kiansas City, KS); Mohit Mathur (Olathe, KS); Michael Morrissey (Overland Park, KS); Clinton Smoyer (Raymore, MO)
Assignee: CenturyLink Intellectual Property LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,521,123
App. No.
12/398,813
Granted
Aug 27, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

In one embodiment of the present invention, a system and method may be provided for authoritative validation of mobile service permissions. The system and method may include receiving a preemption request from a first responder to preempt non-emergency communications. Determining whether the first responder is authorized to preempt communications. Prioritizing communications from the first responder, if the first responder is authorized to preempt communications. Alternatively the first responder may be notified if the first responder is not authorized to preempt communications.

Claims (24)

1. A method for authoritative validation of mobile service permissions, said method comprising:

receiving a preemption request from a first responder communications source to preempt non-emergency communications, wherein the preemption request specifies a communication type to preempt for non-emergency communications;

determining affected transmission sites to be preempted;

placing the affected transmission sites in a preemption mode for non-emergency communications based on the preemption request;

receiving, from a first communication device located in one of the affected transmission sites, a communications request to initiate a communication to a second communication device;

determining whether the communications request is authorized in response to determining that the affected transmission sites are in a preemption mode, wherein determining whether the communications request is authorized includes first determining whether the first communication device is included in a first responder registry and if not, second determining whether a type of communication associated with the communications request matches the communication type preempted for non-emergency communications;

initiating the communication associated with the communications request in response to the first determination that the first communication device is included in the first responder registry or in response to the second determination that the type of communication associated with the communications request does not match the communication type preempted for non-emergency communications;

transmitting a message to the first communication device indicating that there is an emergency and that the communication request has been preempted in response to determining that the first communication device is not included in the first responder registry and in response to the second determination that the type of communication associated with the communications request matches the communication type preempted for non-emergency.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the message, transmitted to the first communication device indicating that there is an emergency and that the communication request has been preempted in response to the second determination that the type of communication associated with the communications request matches the communication type preempted for non-emergency, includes an allowed communication type that is available to the first communication device.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein determining affected transmission sites to be preempted, includes determining, based upon a location of a first responder communications source, cell towers that are affected by an emergency or other event.

4. The method according to claim 1 ,

further comprising transmitting an emergency preemption notification to the second communication device associated with the received communications request is notified in response to determining that the first communication device is not included in the first responder registry and in response to the second determination that the type of communication associated with the communications request matches the communication type preempted for non-emergency.

5. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising communicating an all-clear instruction, in response to the determination that an emergency has subsided.

6. A control call center system, said control call center system comprising:

a processor;

a memory operable to store data and executable instructions, the data accessible by the processor;

the processor configured execute the executable instructions to:

initiate a preemption mode to prioritize emergency communications for one or more transmission sites in response to receiving a preemption command to place the one or more transmission sites in a preemption mode, wherein the preemption command specifies a communication type to preempt for non-emergency communications;

receive a communications request to initiate a call, from a first communications device located in one of the transmission sites, to a second communication device;

determine whether the communications request is authorized, wherein determining whether the communications request is authorized includes first determining whether the first communication device is included in a first responder registry and if not, second determining whether a type of communication associated with the communications request matches the communication type preempted for non-emergency communications

initiate the communication associated with the communications request in response to the first determination that the first communication device is included in the first responder registry or in response to the second determination that the type of communication associated with the communications request does not match the communication type preempted for non-emergency communications; and

transmitting a message to the first communication device indicating that there is an emergency and that the communication request from the first communication device has been preempted in response to determining that the first communication device is not included in the first responder registry and in response to the second determination that the type of communication associated with the communications request matches the communication type preempted for non-emergency.

7. The control call center system according to claim 6 , wherein the processor is further configured to execute the executable instructions to prioritize emergency communication over non-emergency communication.

8. The control call center system according to claim 6 , wherein, in first determining whether the first communication device is included in the first responder registry includes querying the first responder registry to determine whether there are any restrictions on the first communications device.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 25, 2013
From: EMBARQ HOLDINGS COMPANY, LLC
To: CENTURYLINK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC
Reel/Frame 030889/0364 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2009
From: COOK, ANDREW; KERR, JADE; MATHUR, MOHIT; MORRISSEY, MICHAEL; SMOYER, CLINTON
To: EMBARQ HOLDINGS COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 022352/0509 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20100227581A1 · Sep 9, 2010