IP Library Granted Patent US 8,167,002
Granted Patent B2
US 8,167,002 · App. 12/742,128 · Granted May 1, 2012

Flow restrictor

Assignee: BELIMO Holding AG
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,167,002
App. No.
12/742,128
Granted
May 1, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a flow restrictor ( 1 ) for restricting a volume flow through a liquid line, said flow restrictor comprising a support ( 10 ) having a passage and a bent flat spring ( 11 ) attached to the support ( 10 ). The flat spring ( 11 ) comprises at least one spring tab ( 12 ) and the passage at least one opening ( 13 ), the spring tab ( 12 ) and the opening ( 13 ) having a substantially identical extension along a longitudinal direction. The spring tab ( 12 ) is designed and arranged above the opening ( 13 ) in such a manner that it increasingly rests against the support ( 10 ) with increasing differential pressure, thereby gradually making the opening ( 13 ) smaller and continuously reducing the passage within a defined pressure range. The dimensions of the opening ( 13 ) are adjusted corresponding to the size of the spring tab ( 12 ), thereby allowing a compact flow restrictor ( 1 ) which is less susceptible to dirt. The continuous reduction of the passage allows an increase in vibration resistance of the flow restrictor ( 1 ).

Claims (30)

1. A flow restrictor ( 1 ) for limiting a volume flow through a liquid line ( 2 ), comprising:

a carrier ( 10 ) with a passage and a bent flat form spring ( 11 ) which is attached to the carrier ( 10 ) and which is designed to be flattened increasingly with a rising differential pressure (Δp),

wherein, the flat form spring ( 11 ) has at least one spring tongue ( 12 , 17 , 19 ),

wherein, the passage comprises at least two orifices ( 13 , 18 ) lying next to one another, the spring tongue ( 12 , 17 , 19 ) and the orifices ( 13 , 18 ) having an essentially identical extent in each case in a longitudinal direction,

wherein, the carrier ( 10 ) comprises at least one web ( 14 ) which in each case separates two orifices ( 13 , 18 ) lying next to one another from one another, and

wherein, each spring tongue ( 12 , 19 ) is configured and arranged above the orifices ( 13 , 18 ) so that, with a rising differential pressure (Δp), said spring tongue increasingly lies upon the web ( 14 ) and continuously reduces the orifices ( 13 , 18 ), in order to reduce the passage continuously within a defined pressure range, the orifices ( 18 ) remaining open in defined remaining regions.

2. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the flat form spring ( 11 ) is fastened to an outer marginal region of the carrier ( 10 ), and in that the at least two orifices ( 13 , 18 ) extend from the outer marginal region, where the flat form spring ( 11 ) is fastened, as far as the opposite outer marginal and region of the carrier ( 10 ).

3. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the passage comprises a plurality of rotationally symmetrically arranged orifices ( 18 ), and in that the flat form spring ( 11 ) comprises a plurality of rotationally symmetrically arranged spring tongues ( 17 , 19 ) which are in each case arranged so that, with a rising differential pressure (Δp), they lie increasingly upon the assigned webs ( 14 ) and continuously reduce the orifices ( 18 ).

4. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the spring tongues ( 19 ) are fastened to an outer marginal region of the carrier ( 10 ).

5. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the spring tongues ( 17 ) are fastened in the center (Z) of the carrier ( 10 ).

6. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the spring tongue ( 17 ) is arranged above the orifices ( 13 , 18 ) so that, with a rising differential pressure (Δp), it also lies increasingly upon the side regions bordering the orifices ( 13 , 18 ).

7. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the carrier ( 10 ) is configured as a round disk which comprises, on the outer marginal region, an erected collar ( 15 ) for insertion into a pipe line.

8. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 7 , wherein part of the collar ( 15 ) is bent back onto the disk and clamps the flat form spring ( 11 ) to the carrier ( 10 ).

9. A method for limiting a volume flow through a liquid line ( 2 ), comprising:

attaching a bent flat form spring ( 11 ) to a carrier ( 10 ) with a passage, and

flattening the flat form spring ( 11 ) increasingly with a rising differential pressure (Δp),

wherein, the flat form spring ( 11 ) is provided with at least one spring tongue ( 12 , 17 , 19 ) and the passage is provided with at least two orifices ( 13 , 18 ) lying next to one another, the spring tongue ( 12 , 17 , 19 ) and the orifices ( 13 , 18 ) being configured with an essentially identical extent in each case in a longitudinal direction,

wherein, the carrier ( 10 ) comprises at least one web ( 14 ) which in each case separates two orifices ( 13 , 18 ) lying next to one another from one another, and

wherein, each spring tongue ( 12 , 19 ) is configured and arranged above the orifices ( 13 , 18 ) so that, with a rising differential pressure (Δp), said spring tongue lies increasingly upon the web ( 14 ) and continuously reduces the orifices ( 13 , 18 ), in order to reduce the passage continuously within a defined pressure range, the orifices ( 18 ) remaining open in defined remaining regions.

10. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the spring tongue ( 17 ) is arranged above the orifices ( 13 , 18 ) so that, with a rising differential pressure (Δp), it also lies increasingly upon the side regions bordering the orifices ( 13 , 18 ).

11. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the spring tongue ( 17 ) is arranged above the orifices ( 13 , 18 ) so that, with a rising differential pressure (Δp), it also lies increasingly upon the side regions bordering the orifices ( 13 , 18 ).

12. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 4 , wherein the spring tongue ( 17 ) is arranged above the orifices ( 13 , 18 ) so that, with a rising differential pressure (Δp), it also lies increasingly upon the side regions bordering the orifices ( 13 , 18 ).

13. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the spring tongue ( 17 ) is arranged above the orifices ( 13 , 18 ) so that, with a rising differential pressure (Δp), it also lies increasingly upon the side regions bordering the orifices ( 13 , 18 ).

14. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the carrier ( 10 ) is configured as a round disk which comprises, on the outer marginal region, an erected collar ( 15 ) for insertion into a pipe line.

15. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the carrier ( 10 ) is configured as a round disk which comprises, on the outer marginal region, an erected collar ( 15 ) for insertion into a pipe line.

16. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 4 , wherein the carrier ( 10 ) is configured as a round disk which comprises, on the outer marginal region, an erected collar ( 15 ) for insertion into a pipe line.

17. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the carrier ( 10 ) is configured as a round disk which comprises, on the outer marginal region, an erected collar ( 15 ) for insertion into a pipe line.

18. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 6 , wherein the carrier ( 10 ) is configured as a round disk which comprises, on the outer marginal region, an erected collar ( 15 ) for insertion into a pipe line.

19. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 14 , wherein part of the collar ( 15 ) is bent back onto the disk and clamps the flat form spring ( 11 ) to the carrier ( 10 ).

20. The flow restrictor ( 1 ) as claimed in claim 15 , wherein part of the collar ( 15 ) is bent back onto the disk and clamps the flat form spring ( 11 ) to the carrier ( 10 ).

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2010
From: KUHNE, JORG; PULLI, PINO; KELLER, URS
To: BELIMO HOLDING AG
Reel/Frame 024908/0326 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 07405327 · Nov 15, 2007 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20100319784A1 · Dec 23, 2010