Systems, methods, and interfaces for extending legal search results
The present invention makes legal research more efficient by selecting clusters in response to the behavior of a user (e.g., a legal professional such as a paralegal, lawyer, or judge). The clusters, which are formed prior to the user accessing a legal document (and thus, providing user behavior to a system), are identified to the based upon a set of metadata associated with the legal document. At least two clusters are identified and a signal associated therewith is transmitted to the user. Each cluster is associated with a unique legal topic. Further, each cluster may comprise primary and/or secondary authority.
1. A method comprising:
receiving a search request signal, the search request signal comprising a search request for a set of legal information; identifying a set of legal documents in response to the search request signal; transmitting a search response signal associated with the set of legal documents;
receiving a selection signal, the selection signal indicative of a selection of a given legal document from the set of legal documents, the legal document being associated with a set of metadata;
based upon the set of metadata, picking a first cluster of legal documents and a second cluster of legal documents, the first cluster of legal documents being a first set of documents comprising one or more primary resources and one or more secondary resources grouped according to a first legal topic which the first set of documents hold in common and the second cluster of legal documents being a second set of documents comprising one or more primary resources and one or more secondary resources grouped according to a second legal topic which the second set of legal documents hold in common,
wherein the picking of the first cluster of legal documents and the second cluster of legal documents is based upon, respectively:
a first similarity score between the legal document and the first set of documents belonging to the first cluster of legal documents, wherein the first similarity score is based upon a measure of associated citation information between the legal document and the first set of documents, wherein the associated citation information comprises editorial annotations, hierarchical categorization of legal topics, and relationship between legal topics;
a second similarity score between the legal document and the second set of documents belonging to the second cluster of legal documents, wherein the second similarity score is based upon a measure of associated citation information between the legal document and the second set of documents, wherein the associated citation information comprises editorial annotations, hierarchical categorization of legal topics, and relationship between legal topics; and
transmitting a second signal relating to the first cluster of legal documents and the second cluster of legal documents.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the second signal, when received, processed, and displayed, will result in a topical display.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the topical display comprises a first portion relating to the first legal topic and a second portion relating the second legal topic.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the first similarity score is further based upon a measure of a common noun phrase frequency between the legal document and the first set of documents.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the second similarity score is further based upon a measure of a common noun phrase frequency between the legal document and the second set of documents.
6. A computing device comprising:
a processor;
a memory operatively coupled to the processor, the memory storing instructions that cause the processor to:
receive a search request signal, the search request signal comprising a search request for a set of legal information; identify a set of legal documents in response to the search request signal, the set of legal documents comprising the legal document; transmit a signal associated with the set of legal documents;
receive a selection signal, the selection signal indicative of a selection of a given legal document from the set of legal documents, the legal document being associated with a set of metadata;
based upon the set of metadata, pick a first cluster of legal documents and a second cluster of legal documents, the first cluster of legal documents being a first set of documents comprising one or more primary resources and one or more secondary resources grouped according to a first legal topic which the first set of documents hold in common and the second cluster of legal documents being a second set of documents comprising one or more primary resources and one or more secondary resources grouped according to a second legal topic which the second set of legal documents hold in common,
wherein picking the first cluster of legal documents and the second cluster of legal documents is based upon, respectively:
a first similarity score between the legal document and a first set of documents belonging to the first cluster of legal documents, wherein the first similarity score is based upon a measure of associated citation information between the legal document and the first set of documents, wherein the associated citation information comprises editorial annotations, hierarchical categorization of legal topics, and relationship between legal topics; and
a second similarity score between the legal document and a second set of documents belonging to the second cluster of legal documents, wherein the second similarity score is based upon a measure of associated citation information between the legal document and the second set of documents, wherein the associated citation information comprises editorial annotations, hierarchical categorization of legal topics, and relationship between legal topics; and
transmit a second signal relating to the first cluster of legal documents and the second cluster of legal documents.
7. The device of claim 6 wherein the first similarity score is further based upon a measure of a common noun phrase frequency between the legal document and the first set of documents.
8. The device of claim 6 wherein the second similarity score is further based upon a measure of a common noun phrase frequency between the legal document and the second set of documents.