System and method to dynamically allocate electronic mailboxes
Systems and methods for balancing electronic mailboxes among databases communicatively coupled to an information handling system are disclosed. A method may include comparing an actual utilization values for a first database to a threshold utilization value for the first database and, depending upon the results, identifying the first database as over-utilized. The method may also include comparing an actual utilization values for a second database to a threshold utilization value for the second database and, depending upon the results, identifying the second database as under-utilized. The method may further include comparing a threshold usage value of a first electronic mailbox stored in the first database to an upper threshold usage value for the first electronic mailbox and, depending upon the results, identifying the first electronic mailbox as heavily-utilized. The method may also include moving the heavily-utilized electronic mailbox to the second database.
1. A method for balancing a plurality of electronic mailboxes among a plurality of databases, comprising:
comparing an actual utilization value for a first database to an upper threshold utilization value for the first database and, if the actual utilization value of the first database is greater than the upper threshold utilization value of the first database, identifying the first database as over-utilized, wherein the first database is one of the plurality of databases;
comparing an actual utilization value for a second database to a lower threshold utilization value for the second database and, if the actual utilization value of the second database is less than the lower threshold utilization value of the second database, identifying the second database as under-utilized, wherein the second database is one of the plurality of databases;
comparing an actual usage value of a first electronic mailbox, the first electronic mailbox being one of a plurality of electronic mailboxes stored in the first database, to an upper threshold usage value for the first electronic mailbox and, if the actual usage value of the first electronic mailbox is greater than the upper threshold usage value of the first electronic mailbox, identifying the first electronic mailbox as a heavily-utilized first electronic mailbox;
identifying a lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox or a moderately-utilized third mailbox in the second database;
moving the heavily-utilized first electronic mailbox to the second database; and
moving one of the lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox or the moderately-utilized third mailbox to the first database, wherein electronic mailboxes are moved between the first database and the second database on a one-to-one basis.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
comparing an actual usage value of a second electronic mailbox, the second electronic mailbox being one of the plurality of electronic mailboxes stored in the second database, to a lower threshold usage value for the second electronic mailbox and, if the actual usage value of the second electronic mailbox is less than the lower threshold usage value of the second electronic mailbox, identifying the second electronic mailbox as a lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox; and
comparing an actual usage value of a third electronic mailbox, the third electronic mailbox being one of a plurality of electronic mailboxes stored in the second database, to a lower threshold usage value for the third electronic mailbox and an upper threshold usage value for the third electronic mailbox and, if the actual usage value of the third electronic mailbox is greater than the lower threshold usage value of the third electronic mailbox and less than the upper threshold usage value of the third electronic mailbox, identifying the third electronic mailbox as a moderately-utilized third electronic mailbox.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein a notification is created if the first database is identified as over-utilized and no second database is identified as under-utilized.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper threshold utilization value for the first database comprises one of manufacturer specification data for the first database and industry standard specification data for the first database.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the lower threshold utilization value for the second database comprises one of manufacturer specification data for the second database and industry standard specification data for the second database.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the actual usage value of the first electronic mailbox comprises a measure of the number of requests to a mail server over a period of time.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein moving the heavily-utilized first electronic mailbox to the second database comprises considering the performance characteristics of the second database.
8. An information handling system for balancing a plurality of electronic mailboxes among a plurality of databases, the information handling system comprising:
a processor;
a non-transitory computer readable medium communicatively coupled to the processor; and
computer-executable instructions encoded in the computer readable medium, the instructions, when executed by the processor, operable to perform operations comprising:
comparing an actual utilization value of a first database to an upper threshold utilization value for the first database and, if the actual utilization value of the first database is greater than the upper threshold utilization value of the first database, identify the first database as over-utilized, wherein the first database is one of the plurality of databases;
comparing an actual utilization value of a second database, the second database being one of the plurality of databases, to a lower threshold utilization value of the second database and, if the actual utilization value of the second database is less than the lower threshold utilization value of the second database, identify the second database as under-utilized, wherein the second database is one of the plurality of databases;
notifying a component utilization controller module to move a heavily-utilized first electronic mailbox in the first database to the second database, wherein the heavily-utilized first electronic mailbox is identified based at least on comparing an actual usage value of the first electronic mailbox to an upper threshold usage value for the first electronic mailbox; and
notifying the component utilization controller module to move one of a lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox or a moderately-utilized third mailbox in the second database to the first database;
wherein electronic mailboxes are moved between the first database and the second database on a one-to-one basis.
9. The information handling system of claim 8 , wherein the upper threshold utilization value for the first database comprises one of manufacturer specification data for the first database and industry standard specification data for the first database.
10. The information handling system of claim 8 , wherein the lower threshold utilization value for the second database comprises one of manufacturer specification data for the second database and industry standard specification data for the second database.
11. The information handling system of claim 8 , wherein a notification is created if the first database is identified as over-utilized and no second database is identified as under-utilized.
12. An information handling system for balancing a plurality of electronic mailboxes among a plurality of databases, the information handling system comprising:
a processor;
a non-transitory computer readable medium communicatively coupled to the processor; and
computer-executable instructions encoded in the computer readable medium, the instructions, when executed by the processor, operable to perform operations comprising:
receiving a notification from a data gathering module to move a heavily-utilized first electronic mailbox in an over-utilized database to an under-utilized database;
comparing an actual usage value of a first electronic mailbox to an upper threshold usage value for the first electronic mailbox and, if the actual usage value of the first electronic mailbox is greater than the upper threshold usage value of the first electronic mailbox, identify the first electronic mailbox as a heavily-utilized first electronic mailbox, wherein the first electronic mailbox is one of the plurality of electronic mailboxes stored in the over-utilized database;
identifying a lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox or a moderately-utilized third mailbox in the second database;
moving the heavily-utilized first electronic mailbox in the over-utilized database to the under-utilized database; and
moving one of the lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox or the moderately-utilized third electronic mailbox to the first database, wherein electronic mailboxes are moved between the first database and the second database on a one-to-one basis.
13. The information handling system of claim 12 , wherein the computer-executable instructions, when executed by the processor, are further operable to perform operations comprising:
comparing an actual usage value of a second electronic mailbox, the second electronic mailbox being one of the plurality of electronic mailboxes stored in the under-utilized database, to a lower threshold usage value for the second electronic mailbox and, if the actual usage value of the second electronic mailbox is less than the lower threshold usage value of the second electronic mailbox, identify the second electronic mailbox as a lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox; and
comparing an actual usage value of a third electronic mailbox, the third electronic mailbox being one of a plurality of electronic mailboxes stored in the second database, to a lower threshold usage value for the third electronic mailbox and an upper threshold usage value for the third electronic mailbox and, if the actual usage value of the third electronic mailbox is greater than the lower threshold usage value of the third electronic mailbox and less than the upper threshold usage value of the third electronic mailbox, identifying the third electronic mailbox as a moderately-utilized third electronic mailbox.
14. The information handling system of claim 12 , wherein the computer-executable instructions, when executed by the processor, are further operable to perform operations comprising moving the lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox to the over-utilized database.
15. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the actual utilization value for the first database comprises a number of input-output operations over a period of time for an information handling system component on which the first database is located; and
the actual utilization value for the second database comprises a number of input-output operations over a period of time for an information handling system component on which the second database is located.
16. The information handling system of claim 8 , wherein:
the actual utilization value for the first database comprises a number of input-output operations over a period of time for an information handling system component on which the first database is located; and
the actual utilization value for the second database comprises a number of input-output operations over a period of time for an information handling system component on which the second database is located.
17. The information handling system of claim 12 , wherein:
the actual utilization value for the first database comprises a number of input-output operations over a period of time for an information handling system component on which the first database is located; and
the actual utilization value for the second database comprises a number of input-output operations over a period of time for an information handling system component on which the second database is located.
18. The information handling system of claim 8 , wherein:
identifying the lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox comprises comparing an actual usage value of a second electronic mailbox to a lower threshold usage value for the second electronic mailbox and, if the actual usage value of the second electronic mailbox is less than the lower threshold usage value of the second electronic mailbox, identifying the second electronic mailbox as a lightly-utilized second electronic mailbox; and
identifying the moderately-utilized third electronic mailbox comprises comparing an actual usage value of a third electronic mailbox to a lower threshold usage value for the third electronic mailbox and an upper threshold usage value for the third electronic mailbox and, if the actual usage value of the third electronic mailbox is greater than the lower threshold usage value of the third electronic mailbox and less than the upper threshold usage value of the third electronic mailbox, identifying the third electronic mailbox as a moderately-utilized third electronic mailbox.