IP Library Granted Patent US 9,206,709
Granted Patent B2
US 9,206,709 · App. 12/999,088 · Granted Dec 8, 2015

Method for the installation control in a power plant

Inventors: Andreas Christidis (Berlin, DE); Klaus Wendelberger (St. Leon-Rot, DE)
Assignee: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
F01K13/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,206,709
App. No.
12/999,088
Granted
Dec 8, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for the installation control in a power plant is provided. A functional value of a target function based on a physical model is generated for a plurality of sets of variables, from respectively a set of environment variable and the respective set of variables, the functional value is allocated to the respective sets. The set of variables is selected to be transmitted to a control device of the power plant, whose allocated functional value complies with a predefined optimization criterion. In addition to a starting set and a set determined on the basis of the starting set and the functional value allocated thereto using a gradient method, the number of sets of variables further includes a set selected by a random generator. In addition, a control apparatus for a power plant using the method and a power plant using the control apparatus are provided.

Claims (62)

1. A method for the installation control in a power plant, comprising:

generating a functional value of a target function based on a physical model for a plurality of sets of variables from respectively a set of environment variables and the respective set of variables,

wherein the target function comprises a steeply ascending penalty function;

wherein the penalty function has a quantitatively greater ascent than the target function;

optimizing an unmodified target function under active consideration of the penalty function,

allocating the functional value to the respective sets; and

transmitting a selected set of variables to a control device of the power plant wherein the allocated functional value complies with a predefined optimization criterion,

wherein in addition to a starting set and a first set determined on the basis of the starting set and the functional value allocated thereto using a gradient method, a number of the plurality of sets of variables further comprises a second set selected by a random generator.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 ,

wherein the method is performed with cyclic repetition in a form of a loop, and

wherein the selected set of variables of a first cycle is a starting set of a second cycle which follows the first cycle.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the selected set of variables is forwarded from the control device to the respective control devices of the power plant allocated to the individual variables.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the penalty function supplies the value of zero when a plurality of restrictions are not infringed.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the penalty function supplies a value greater than zero when a plurality of restrictions are infringed.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein before the determination in each case of the first set using the gradient method, an increment is predefined.

7. A control apparatus for a power plant, comprising:

a control device;

a storage module;

a random generator module;

a gradient module; and

a comparison module,

wherein the random generator module and the gradient module are connected on a data output side to the comparison module,

wherein the comparison module compares the output from the random generator module and the gradient module and sends a comparison to the storage module, and

wherein the control apparatus is designed to perform a method for the installation control in a power plant, comprising:

generating a functional value of a target function based on a physical model for a plurality of sets of variables from respectively a set of environment variables and the respective set of variables,

wherein the target function comprises a steeply ascending penalty function,

wherein the penalty function has a quantitatively greater ascent than the target function;

optimizing an unmodified target function under active consideration of the penalty function,

comparing the plurality of sets of variables and their respective functional values,

allocating the functional value to the respective sets, and

transmitting a selected set of variables from the storage module to the control device of the power plant wherein the allocated functional value complies with a predefined optimization criterion,

wherein in addition to a starting set and a first set determined on the basis of the starting set and the functional value allocated thereto using a gradient method, a number of the plurality of sets of variables further comprises a second set selected by a random generator.

8. The control apparatus as claimed in claim 7 ,

wherein the method is performed with cyclic repetition in a form of a loop, and

wherein the selected set of variables of a first cycle is a starting set of a second cycle which follows the first cycle.

9. The control apparatus as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the selected set of variables is forwarded from the control device to the respective control devices of the power plant allocated to the individual variables.

10. The control apparatus as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the penalty function supplies the value of zero when a plurality of restrictions are not infringed.

11. The control apparatus as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the penalty function supplies a value greater than zero when a plurality of restrictions are infringed.

12. The control apparatus as claimed in claim 7 , wherein before the determination in each case of the set using the gradient method, an increment is predefined.

13. A power plant, comprising:

a control device; and

a control apparatus connected to the control device on a data input side, the control apparatus comprising:

a storage module;

a random generator module;

a gradient module; and

a comparison module,

wherein the random generator module and the gradient module are connected on a data output side to the comparison module,

wherein the comparison module compares the output from the random generator module and the gradient module and sends a comparison to the storage module, and

wherein the control apparatus is designed to perform a method for the installation control in a power plant, comprising:

generating a functional value of a target function based on a physical model for a plurality of sets of variables from respectively a set of environment variables and the respective set of variables,

wherein the target function comprises a steeply ascending penalty function,

wherein the penalty function has a quantitatively greater ascent than the target function;

optimizing an unmodified target function under active consideration of the penalty function,

comparing the plurality of sets of variables and their respective functional values,

allocating the functional value to the respective sets, and

transmitting a selected set of variables from the storage module to the control device of the power plant wherein the allocated functional value complies with a predefined optimization criterion,

wherein in addition to a starting set and a first set determined on the basis of the starting set and the functional value allocated thereto using a gradient method, a number of the plurality of sets of variables further comprises a second set selected by a random generator.

14. The power plant as claimed in claim 13 ,

wherein the method is performed with cyclic repetition in a form of a loop, and

wherein the selected set of variables of a first cycle is a starting set of a second cycle which follows the first cycle.

15. The power plant as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the selected set of variables is forwarded from the control device to the respective control devices of the power plant allocated to the individual variables.

16. The power plant as claimed in claim 13 , wherein before the determination in each case of the first set using the gradient method, an increment is predefined.

Assignments (4)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 27, 2021
From: SIEMENS GAS AND POWER GMBH & CO. KG
To: SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 056408/0395 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 28, 2020
From: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
To: SIEMENS GAS AND POWER GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 053627/0545 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 17, 2011
From: EDER, HANNS; WEISSENBORN, ANKE
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 025973/0655 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 17, 2011
From: CHRISTIDIS, ANDREAS; WENDELBERGER, KLAUS
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 025973/0747 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2008 028 527 · Jun 16, 2008 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20110160926A1 · Jun 30, 2011