IP Library Granted Patent US 9,133,850
Granted Patent B2
US 9,133,850 · App. 13/005,601 · Granted Sep 15, 2015

Method for preventing surge in a dynamic compressor using adaptive preventer control system and adaptive safety margin

Inventors: Krishnan Narayanan (Urbandale, IA); Paul Reinke (Elkhart, IA); Nikhil Dukle (West Des Moines, IA)
Assignee: Energy Control Technologies, Inc.
F04D27/001F04D27/0223
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,133,850
App. No.
13/005,601
Granted
Sep 15, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of preventing surge in a dynamic compressor is disclosed. The method includes providing an anti-surge valve having an adjustable opening for increasing the flow through a dynamic compressor. The next step is sensing process conditions in the dynamic control to determine a compressor load variable. A control system estimates a process disturbance model using the compressor load variable. The control system then adjusts a safety margin using a rate limited response and initiates a closed loop response using process feedback based on the process disturbance model. The control system adjusts the opening of the anti-surge valve according to the safety margin and closed loop response.

Claims (36)

1. A method of preventing surge in a dynamic compressor, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a surge valve having an adjustable opening for increasing a flow through the dynamic compressor;

sensing process conditions in the dynamic compressor to determine a compressor load variable;

estimating a process disturbance model using the compressor load variable; and

initiating a closed loop control response to open the surge valve based on the process disturbance model wherein the closed loop control response is initiated by opening the surge valve as a function of a compressor dynamic operating point distance from a surge limit line wherein the surge valve is opened in a step response.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the compressor load variable is determined based on a compressor driver power.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein a compressor driver is selected from the group consisting of a motor, steam turbine and gas turbine.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the compressor load variable is based on compressor driver rotating speed.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the compressor load variable is determined based on a system process variable.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the system process variable is a header pressure or flow of a process associated with the compressor.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the compressor load variable is determined based on mathematical modeling of a system component.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the process disturbance model is estimated by using a digital derivative of the compressor load variable.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the process disturbance model is estimated by using a delayed response of the compressor load variable.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the process disturbance model is estimated by using a filter response of the compressor load variable.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein a surge model response of the compressor load is determined when a rate of change of the compressor load variable exceeds a defined limit.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the compressor load variable is a flow of the compressor.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the compressor load variable is a temperature measurement associated with the compressor.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the compressor load variable is a pressure measurement associated with the compressor.

15. The method of claim 11 wherein the compressor load variable is a distance of the compressor operating point from the surge limit line.

16. The method of claim 11 wherein the compressor load variable is a power of a compressor driver.

17. The method of claim 11 wherein the compressor load variable is a speed of the compressor.

18. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of differentiating a steady state response from process disturbance upsets.

19. The method of claim 1 wherein the step opening is a fixed rate of opening.

20. The method of claim 1 wherein the step opening is a varied rate of opening based upon the response of the process disturbance model.

21. The method of claim 1 wherein the surge valve is opened if a distance from the compressor dynamic operating point of the compressor to the surge limit line is at a distance less than a predetermined set point.

22. The method of claim 1 wherein the surge valve is closed using a rate limited response once a predetermined set point is exceeded.

23. The method of claim 22 wherein a rate of closure of the surge valve is adjusted based on the closed loop response.

24. The method of claim 22 wherein a rate of closure of the surge valve is adjusted based on the distance of the compressor dynamic operating point from the surge limit line.

25. The method of claim 1 wherein the compressor load variable is determined from at least two of a group consisting of the operating point as a function of the surge limit, power of a compressor driver, rotating speed of the compressor driver, and a system process variable.

26. A method of preventing surge in a dynamic compressor, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a surge valve having an adjustable opening for increasing flow through the dynamic compressor;

sensing process conditions in the dynamic compressor to determine a compressor load variable;

estimating a process disturbance model using the compressor load variable; and

initiating a closed loop control response to open the surge valve based on the process disturbance mode wherein the closed loop control response is initiated by opening the surge valve as a function of a compressor dynamic operating point distance from a surge limit line wherein the surge valve is opened in a ramp response.

27. The method of claim 26 wherein the ramp rate of response is a fixed rate of opening.

28. The method of claim 26 wherein the ramp rate of response is a varied rate of opening based upon the response of the process disburbance model.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2012
From: NARAYANAN, KRISHNAN; REINKE, PAUL; DUKLE, NIKHIL
To: ENERGY CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 027498/0558 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20120183385A1 · Jul 19, 2012