IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,823,790
Granted Patent B2
US 8,823,790 · App. 13/211,956 · Granted Sep 2, 2014

Methods of producing laser speckle contrast images

Inventors: Andrew Dunn (Austin, TX); William James Tom (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Board of Regents, The University of Texas System
G02B27/48A61B5/02028A61B5/0059A61B5/7257A61B5/0261
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,823,790
App. No.
13/211,956
Granted
Sep 2, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods of imaging are provided. In some embodiments, the methods may comprise obtaining a raw speckle image of a sample, converting the raw speckle image to a laser speckle contrast image using a laser speckle contrast algorithm, and converting a laser speckle contrast image to a relative correlation time image using a relative correlation time algorithm.

Claims (231)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining a raw speckle image of a sample;

converting the raw speckle image to a laser speckle contrast image using a laser speckle contrast algorithm; and

converting the laser speckle contrast image to a relative correlation time image using a relative correlation time algorithm;

wherein the laser speckle contrast algorithm is a direct algorithm that uses the following formula:

k

=

s

I

〈

I

〉

=

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

(

I

i

-

〈

I

〉

)

2

N

-

1

〈

I

〉

where speckle contrast k is equal to the standard deviation of time-integrated intensity s I divided by the mean time-integrated intensity (I) and where N is a positive integer.

2. A method comprising:

obtaining a raw speckle image of a sample;

converting the raw speckle image to a laser speckle contrast image using a laser speckle contrast algorithm; and

converting the laser speckle contrast image to a relative correlation time image using a relative correlation time algorithm;

wherein the laser speckle contrast algorithm is a sums algorithm that uses the following formula:

k

=

s

I

〈

I

〉

=

N

⁢

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

I

i

2

-

(

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

I

i

)

2

N

⁡

(

N

-

1

)

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

I

i

N

where speckle contrast k is seen to be equal to the standard deviation of time-integrated intensity s I divided by the mean time-integrated intensity (I) and where N is a positive integer.

3. A method comprising:

obtaining a raw speckle image of a sample;

converting the raw speckle image to a laser speckle contrast image using a laser speckle contrast algorithm; and

converting the laser speckle contrast image to a relative correlation time image using a relative correlation time algorithm;

wherein the laser speckle contrast algorithm is a fast Fourier transform-based convolution algorithm that uses the following formula:

k

=

s

I

〈

I

〉

=

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

(

I

i

-

〈

I

〉

)

2

N

-

1

〈

I

〉

where speckle contrast k is seen to be equal to the standard deviation of time-integrated intensity s I divided by the mean time-integrated intensity (I) and where N is a positive integer.

4. A method comprising:

obtaining a raw speckle image of a sample;

converting the raw speckle image to a laser speckle contrast image using a laser speckle contrast algorithm; and

converting the laser speckle contrast image to a relative correlation time image using a relative correlation time algorithm;

wherein the laser speckle contrast algorithm is a roll algorithm that uses the following formula:

k

=

s

I

〈

I

〉

=

N

⁢

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

I

i

2

-

(

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

I

i

)

2

N

⁡

(

N

-

1

)

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

I

i

N

where speckle contrast k is seen to be equal to the standard deviation of time-integrated intensity s I divided by the mean time-integrated intensity (I) and where N is a positive integer.

5. A method comprising:

obtaining a raw speckle image of a sample;

converting the raw speckle image to a laser speckle contrast image using a roll algorithm that uses the following formula:

k

=

s

I

〈

I

〉

=

N

⁢

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

I

i

2

-

(

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

I

i

)

2

N

⁡

(

N

-

1

)

∑

i

=

1

N

⁢

I

i

N

where speckle contrast k is seen to be equal to the standard deviation of time-integrated intensity s I divided by the mean time-integrated intensity (I) and where N is a positive integer; and

converting the laser speckle contrast image to a relative correlation time image using a relative correlation time algorithm.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the relative correlation time algorithm is a Newton method algorithm, a table method algorithm, a hybrid method algorithm, or an asymptote method algorithm.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein converting the raw speckle image to a laser speckle contrast image occurs at a rate greater than or equal to 100 images per second.

8. The method of claim 5 wherein converting the laser speckle contrast image to the relative correlation time image occurs at a rate greater than or equal to 200 images per second.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Sep 17, 2014
From: OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 033763/0399 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 2, 2011
From: DUNN, ANDREW; TOM, WILLIAM JAMES
To: BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM
Reel/Frame 027323/0962 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part PCTUS2010024435 · Feb 17, 2010
Provisional Application 61153006 · Feb 17, 2009
Related Publication 20120071769A1 · Mar 22, 2012