IP Library Granted Patent US 8,282,397
Granted Patent B2
US 8,282,397 · App. 13/311,676 · Granted Oct 9, 2012

Computer system and method for training, certifying or monitoring human clinical raters

Assignee: UBC Specialty Clinical Services, LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,282,397
App. No.
13/311,676
Granted
Oct 9, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system are disclosed for computerized training, monitoring, certification or re-certification of human raters in clinical trials. The invention provides an interactive computerized interview that can be compared scores obtained by human raters to monitor and train clinical raters on a continuing basis in order to reduce rater drift and variance during clinical trials. Remediation can be automatically flagged or provided to improve a deviating rater's performance. Computerized assessment of symptom severity is provided without the need for human clinical raters. The system and method enable screening of prospective patients for inclusion or exclusion from a clinical trial by automatically obtaining computerized ratings of symptom severity.

Claims (98)

1. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject, wherein the one or more rater inputs are received via at least one of a keyboard, a numerical keypad, a dial, a touch screen, a touch pad, a pointing device, a microphone, a telephone, a joystick, a game pad, a satellite dish, fax or a scanner;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score.

2. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score, wherein the processor is included in at least one of a personal computer, a hand-held device, a multi-processor system, a network computer, a minicomputer, or a mainframe computer.

3. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score;

wherein at least one of the first question and the selected second question are presented via a display device.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the display device is at least one of a screen, a monitor, a television, a loudspeaker, or a telephone.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the display device is included on a hand-held device.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein the display device is a screen on a handheld device.

7. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject, wherein the one or more rater inputs are received via a personal computer, a hand-held device, a multi-processor system, a network computer, or a minicomputer;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score.

8. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject, wherein the one or more rater inputs are received via at least one of a universal serial bus (USB) or CD ROM;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score.

9. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject, wherein the one or more rater inputs are received via a network;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the network comprises at least one of a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), or a wireless LAN (WLAN).

11. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score;

wherein at least one of the first question and the selected second question are presented via a network.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the network comprises at least one of a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), or a wireless LAN (WLAN).

13. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject, wherein the one or more rater inputs are received via a web page;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score.

14. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score;

wherein at least one of the first input and the second input are received from the subject via a web page.

15. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject, wherein the one or more rater inputs are received in response to a display of at least one of an audio segment, a video segment, or multimedia segment of an interview with the subject;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject; and

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising storing the at least one of the audio segment, the video segment, or the multimedia segment in a memory.

17. A method for recertifying or monitoring performance of a clinical rater participating in a clinical trial comprising:

receiving one or more rater inputs reflecting the rater's clinical evaluation of a severity of a previously diagnosed condition in a subject;

performing a computerized assessment of the subject to quantify the severity of the previously diagnosed condition in the subject through a computerized interview that comprises:

(a) presenting a first question to the subject and receiving a first input from the subject in response thereto;

(b) based on the first input, selecting a second question from a plurality of questions;

(c) presenting the selected second question-to the subject and receiving a second input from the subject in response thereto; and

(d) based on one or more inputs received from the subject, determining in accordance with a clinical rating scale a computerized severity score for the previously diagnosed condition in the subject;

(e) determining, via a processor, whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score; and

(f) calculating an overall rating based on the one or more rater inputs, wherein the overall rating is used to determine whether the one or more rater inputs are in accordance with the computerized severity score.

Assignments (19)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 23, 2025
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS AGENT
To: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC; CRF INC.
Reel/Frame 072653/0418 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: SIGNANT HEALTH GLOBAL LLC; SIGNANT HEALTH LLC
Reel/Frame 063584/0721 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 54523/0545 Recorded May 8, 2023
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
To: SIGNANT HEALTH GLOBAL LLC (F/K/A BRACKET GLOBAL LLC)
Reel/Frame 063573/0912 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 27, 2023
From: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC
To: SIGNANT HEALTH GLOBAL LLC
Reel/Frame 062881/0376 →
FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 25, 2020
From: BRACKET GLOBAL, LLC
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 054523/0545 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2019
From: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC
To: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC
Reel/Frame 049177/0966 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2019
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP
To: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC
Reel/Frame 049163/0222 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2018
From: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC; CRF INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 046834/0485 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2018
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC
Reel/Frame 046830/0916 →
FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 7, 2018
From: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 047029/0678 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST (FIRST LIEN) Recorded Mar 16, 2017
From: HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, SUCCESSOR TO GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT
To: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC; CLINAPPS, INC.
Reel/Frame 042024/0011 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2017
From: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC
To: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041573/0262 →
SECURITY INTEREST (FIRST LIEN) Recorded Mar 14, 2017
From: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 042006/0491 →
ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 16, 2015
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS RETIRING AGENT
To: HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR AGENT
Reel/Frame 037115/0625 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 15, 2013
From: BRACKET GLOBAL LLC
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 031030/0571 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2013
From: UBC SPECIALTY CLINICAL SERVICES, LLC
To: BRACKET GLOBAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 030194/0346 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 8, 2013
From: CONCORDANT RATER SYSTEMS, INC.
To: UBC SPECIALTY CLINICAL SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 030169/0587 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 3, 2013
From: CONCORDANT RATER SYSTEMS, LLC
To: CONCORDANT RATER SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 030143/0031 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 1, 2013
From: SACHS, GARY STEVEN; PERLIS, ROY HOWARD; DEBONIS, DANIEL VINCENT, II
To: CONCORDANT RATER SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 030124/0829 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 11966439 · Dec 28, 2007
Continuation 10282215 · Oct 28, 2002
Provisional Application 60340113 · Oct 26, 2001
Related Publication 20120078653A1 · Mar 29, 2012