IP Library Granted Patent US 8,626,349
Granted Patent B2
US 8,626,349 · App. 13/374,375 · Granted Jan 7, 2014

Method, a system, a computer-readable medium, and a power controlling apparatus for applying and distributing power

Inventors: Mark Stanley Stanczak (Sterling Heights, MI); Louis Stephen Smutek (Livonia, MI); Alan Wayne Brown (Canton, MI); David Allen Backus (Milford, MI)
Assignee: Global Embedded Technologies, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,626,349
App. No.
13/374,375
Granted
Jan 7, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the invention relate generally to power management and the like, and more particularly, to an apparatus, a system, a method, and a computer-readable medium for providing power controlling functionality to generate configurable power signals and to deliver power during fault conditions. In at least some embodiments, a power control unit can generate power signals having configurable attributes as a function of a mode of operation, a fault type, and the like.

Claims (72)

1. A method of controlling the application of power during faults conditions comprising:

generating a power signal to deliver to a power sink, the power signal having a programmable waveform;

monitoring a parameter to determine whether the parameter is within a range of parameter values associated with operation of the power sink;

comparing the parameter against one or more fault profiles;

detecting a fault as a function of a value for the parameter being noncompliant;

classifying the fault as being associated with a first subset of faults if the parameter matches a first portion of a fault profile of the one or more fault profiles;

classifying the fault as being associated with a second subset of faults if the parameter matches a second portion of the fault profile; and

initiating a fault action.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

confirming whether the fault is absolute.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein confirming whether the fault is absolute comprises:

determining that the value for the parameter is associated with a third subset of parameter values.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein classifying the fault as being associated with a first subset of faults comprises:

confirming whether the fault is mature.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein confirming whether the fault is mature comprises:

determining that the value for the parameter is associated with a first subset of parameter values; and

monitoring a first interval of time during which the value for the parameter is associated with the first subset of parameter values.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising:

detecting that the first interval of time is equivalent to a threshold indicative of a matured fault.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising:

indicating that the fault is mature as a matured fault; and

implementing the fault action.

8. The method of claim 5 further comprising:

detecting that the first interval of time does not exceed a threshold indicative of a matured fault.

9. The method of claim 8 further comprising:

identifying the fault as a nascent fault;

increasing a degree of maturity for the nascent fault while the value for the parameter is associated with the first subset of parameter values; and

decreasing the degree of maturity for the nascent fault while the value for the parameter is associated with the second subset of parameter values.

10. The method of claim 9 further comprising:

indicating that the nascent fault is a mature fault if the degree of maturity meets a threshold degree of maturity.

11. A non-transitory computer-readable storaqe medium configured to determine faults during application of power, the computer-readable medium comprising executable instructions configured to:

cause generation of a power signal to deliver to a power sink, the power signal having a programmable waveform;

monitor a parameter to determine whether the parameter is within a range of parameter values associated with operation of the power sink;

compare the parameter against one or more fault profiles;

detect a fault as a function of a value for the parameter being noncompliant;

classify the fault as being associated with a first subset of faults if the parameter matches a first portion of a fault profile of the one or more fault profiles;

classify the fault as being associated with a second subset of faults if the parameter matches a second portion of the fault profile; and

cause initiation of a fault action.

12. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 further comprising executable instructions configured to:

confirm whether the fault is an extreme fault based on a magnitude-based fault type.

13. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 wherein the executable instructions to cause initiation of the fault action further comprise executable instructions configured to:

generate a notification message.

14. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 wherein the executable instructions further comprise executable instructions configured to:

identify the fault as a nascent fault;

increase a degree of maturity for the nascent fault while the value for the parameter is associated with a first subset of parameter values; and

decrease the degree of maturity for the nascent fault while the value for the parameter is associated with a second subset of parameter values.

15. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 wherein the executable instructions further comprise executable instructions configured to:

indicate that the nascent fault is a mature fault if the degree of maturity meets a threshold degree of maturity.

16. An apparatus comprising:

an input terminal configured to receive data from one or more sensors with which to determine a parameter;

a memory including executable instructions; and

a processor configured to execute the executable instructions to:

monitor the parameter to determine whether the parameter is within a range of parameter values associated with operation of a power sink;

compare the parameter against one or more fault profiles;

detect a fault as a function of a value for the parameter being noncompliant;

classify the fault as being associated with a first type of fault if the parameter matches a first portion of a fault profile of the one or more fault profiles;

classify the fault as being associated with a second type of fault if the parameter matches a second portion of the fault profile;

cause initiation of a fault action; and

cause generation of a power signal to deliver to the power sink, the power signal having a programmable waveform.

17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the processor is further configured to:

confirm whether the fault is an extreme fault based on a magnitude-based fault type.

18. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the processor is further configured to:

identify the fault as a nascent fault;

increase a degree of maturity for the nascent fault while the value for the parameter is associated with a first subset of parameter values;

decrease the degree of maturity for the nascent fault while the value for the parameter is associated with a second subset of parameter values; and

indicate that the nascent fault is a mature fault if the degree of maturity meets a threshold degree of maturity.

19. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the processor is further configured to:

identify that the fault is nascent to form a nascent fault; and

determine whether the nascent fault matures into a subtle fault or dematures such that the fault is extinguished,

wherein the maturation of the nascent fault or the dematuration of the nascent fault is a function of a degree of maturity relative to a threshold degree of maturity.

20. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the processor further comprises:

a centralized processor.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Mar 7, 2017
From: GLOBAL EMBEDDED TECHNOLOGIES. INC.
To: US GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Reel/Frame 041899/0883 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2016
From: STANCZAK, MARK STANLEY; SMUTEK, LOUIS STEPHEN; BROWN, ALAN WAYNE; BACKUS, DAVID ALLEN
To: GLOBAL EMBEDDED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 040094/0084 →
Continuity (3)
Division 12072688 · Feb 27, 2008
Provisional Application 60903914 · Feb 28, 2007
Related Publication 20120283889A1 · Nov 8, 2012