IP Library Granted Patent US 8,616,712
Granted Patent B2
US 8,616,712 · App. 13/429,771 · Granted Dec 31, 2013

Nonsymmetric optical system and design method for nonsymmetric optical system

Inventors: Jannick P. Rolland (Pittsford, NY); Kyle Fuerschbach (Rochester, NY)
Assignee: University of Rochester
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,616,712
App. No.
13/429,771
Granted
Dec 31, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A new family of truly nonsymmetric optical systems that exploit a new fabrication degree of freedom enabled by the introduction of slow-servos to diamond machining; surfaces whose departure from a sphere varies both radially and azimuthally in the aperture, and associated design method.

Claims (53)

1. A nonsymmetric optical system, consisting of:

three optical components each having a respective optical surface n (n=1, 2, 3),

optically coupled in a folded configuration,

wherein each surface n has a center of curvature C n ,

further wherein, in an unfolded configuration C n are off-axis, and

further wherein at least two of the optical surfaces are φ-polynomial surfaces.

2. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein the system is a three minor imaging system characterized by 1.3≦f/#≦4.0 over a full diagonal field of view between 7 to 30 degrees in a spectral region from one micron (1 μm) to 12 μm.

3. The optical system of claim 2 , characterized by an overall RMS wave front error less than λ/100 at 10 μm over the full field of view.

4. The optical system of claim 2 , characterized by characterized by having a maximum envelope diameter that is less than four times a maximum pupil diameter of the system.

5. The optical system of claim 2 , further characterized by an entrance pupil up to 75 mm.

6. A nonsymmetric optical system, consisting of:

three optical components each having a respective optical surface n (n=1, 2, 3),

wherein at least two of the optical surfaces are at least one of a tilted φ-polynomial surface and a decentered φ-polynomial surface.

7. The optical system of claim 6 , wherein the system is a three minor imaging system characterized by 1.3≦f/#≦4.0 over a full diagonal field of view between 7 to 30 degrees in a spectral region from one micron (1 μm) to 12 μm.

8. The optical system of claim 7 , characterized by an overall RMS wave front error less than λ/100 at 10 μm over the full field of view.

9. The optical system of claim 7 , characterized by having a maximum envelope diameter that is less than four times a maximum pupil diameter of the system.

10. The optical system of claim 7 , further characterized by an entrance pupil up to 75 mm.

11. A nonsymmetric optical system, comprising:

three optical components each having a respective optical surface n (n=1, 2, 3), optically coupled in a folded configuration,

wherein each surface n has a center of curvature C n ,

further wherein, in an unfolded configuration C n are off-axis, and

further wherein at least two of the optical surfaces are φ-polynomial surfaces.

12. The optical system of claim 11 , wherein the system is a three minor imaging system characterized by 1.3≦f/#≦4.0 over a full diagonal field of view between 7 to 30 degrees in a spectral region from one micron (1 μm) to 12 μm.

13. The optical system of claim 12 , characterized by an overall RMS wave front error less than λ/100 at 10 μm over the full field of view.

14. The optical system of claim 12 , characterized by having a maximum envelope diameter that is less than four times a maximum pupil diameter of the system.

15. The optical system of claim 12 , further characterized by an entrance pupil up to 75 mm.

16. The optical system of claim 12 , further comprising an uncooled image detector.

17. A nonsymmetric optical system, comprising:

three optical components each having a respective optical surface n (n=1, 2, 3),

wherein at least two of the optical surfaces are at least one of a tilted φ-polynomial surface and a decentered φ-polynomial surface.

18. The optical system of claim 17 , wherein the system is a three minor imaging system characterized by 1.3≦f/#≦4.0 over a full diagonal field of view between 7 to 30 degrees in a spectral region from one micron (1 μm) to 12 μm.

19. The optical system of claim 17 , characterized by an overall RMS wave front error less than λ/100 at 10 μm over the full field of view.

20. The optical system of claim 17 , characterized by having a maximum envelope diameter that is less than four times a maximum pupil diameter of the system.

21. The optical system of claim 17 , further characterized by an entrance pupil up to 75 mm.

22. The optical system of claim 21 , further comprising an uncooled image detector.

23. A method for designing a nonsymmetric optical system, comprising:

a) generating a well-corrected, on-axis, obscured optical system having rotationally symmetric optical surfaces and a field of view;

b) tilting at least one of the optical surfaces to provide an unobscured form of the optical system;

c) determining an aberration performance including one or more dominant aberrations of the unobscured optical system over the field of view, and further determining whether the one or more dominant aberrations are field constant or field dependent; and

if the one or more dominant aberrations are field constant, then

i) adding a phi (φ)-polynomial corresponding to the one or more dominant aberrations as a variable to an optical surface at or adjacent the aperture stop of the system;

ii) optimizing the optical design;

iii) evaluating an image quality metric; and

iv) determining whether the optical system meets a performance specification and, if not, then reiterating steps (c-iv); or

if the one or more dominant aberrations are field dependent, then

v) adding a phi (φ)-polynomial corresponding to a radial order higher than the one or more dominant aberrations as variable to an optical surface that is away from the aperture stop of the system;

vi) optimizing the optical design;

vii) evaluating an image quality metric; and

viii) determining whether the optical system meets a performance

specification and, if not, then reiterating steps (c and v-viii).

24. The method of claim 23 , further comprising designing an optical system including three optical components each having a respective optical surface n (n=1, 2, 3), wherein at least two of the optical surfaces are at least one of a tilted φ-polynomial surface and a decentered φ-polynomial surface.

25. The method of claim 24 , further comprising designing the imaging optical system wherein the system is a three minor imaging system characterized by 1.3≦f/#≦4.0 over a full diagonal field of view between 7 to 30 degrees in a spectral region from one micron (1 μm) to 12 μm.

26. The method of claim 24 , further comprising designing the imaging optical system characterized by an overall RMS wave front error less than λ/100 at 10 μm over the full field of view.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jul 24, 2012
From: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 028622/0370 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 8, 2012
From: ROLLAND, JANNICK P.; FUERSCHBACH, KYLE
To: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
Reel/Frame 028341/0433 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 61467075 · Mar 24, 2011
Provisional Application 61546230 · Oct 12, 2011
Related Publication 20120243114A1 · Sep 27, 2012