IP Library Granted Patent US 9,005,619
Granted Patent B2
US 9,005,619 · App. 13/513,523 · Granted Apr 14, 2015

Methods for enhancing anti-tumor antibody therapy

Inventors: Holbrook Kohrt (Santa Clara, CA); Roch Houot (Rennes, FR); Ronald Levy (Stanford, CA); Arash Ash Alizadeh (San Mateo, CA); Matthew J. Goldstein (Hillsborough, CA); James Torchia (Stanford, CA)
Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
C07K16/2887A61K2039/507C07K16/2863C07K16/2878C07K16/32C07K2317/24C07K2317/73C07K2317/732C07K2317/75
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,005,619
App. No.
13/513,523
Granted
Apr 14, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods of enhancing the efficacy of antibody-directed cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) for therapy directed to killing of tumor cells are disclosed. Cancer specific cell surface antigens are bound by monoclonal antibodies, thereby stimulating a cytotoxic T cell response characterized by an upregulation of cell surface expression of costimulatory molecules on the T cell. The ADCC response is augmented by the subsequent administration of a second antibody that is an agonist of the costimulatory molecule.

Claims (44)

1. A method of treating cancer, the method comprising:

administering to a patient a composition comprising an agonistic antibody to a molecule; whose expression increases on surfaces of natural killer (NK) cells that mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) when such cells are exposed to tumor cells bound by an anti-tumor antibody (an “inducible costimulatory molecule”), which agonistic antibody is characterized as agonistic in that, when the NK cells with the inducible costimulatory molecule on their surface are contacted with the agonistic antibody, their ADCC is increased as compared with that observed absent such contact;

the patient having received anti-tumor antibody therapy a period of time prior to the administering, such that the increase in expression of the inducible costimulatory molecule has occurred.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the agonistic antibody is particularly characterized in that, when tumor cells coated with the anti-tumor antibody are contacted with NK cells in which the inducible costimulatory molecule is expressed on the surface together with the agonistic antibody, apoptosis of the tumor cells is increased relative to that observed in absence of the agonistic antibody.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the increased apoptosis is evaluated by flow cytometry.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the increased apoptosis is evaluated by apoptotic cell death.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the agonistic antibody is particularly characterized in that, when tumor cells coated with the anti-tumor antibody are contacted with NK cells in which the inducible costimulatory molecule is expressed on the surface together with the agonistic antibody, tumor growth is reduced relative to that observed in absence of the agonistic antibody.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the tumor growth is determined by [ 3 H]-thymidine incorporation, counting cell number over a period of time, detecting and/or measuring a marker associated with the cancer of interest.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the increased apoptosis is associated with a reduction in cancer cell population or tumor size.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the agonistic antibody is specifically characterized in that, when NK cells in which the inducible costimulatory molecule is expressed on the surface are contacted with the agonistic antibody, cytokine release from the NK cells is increased relative to that observed in absence of the agonistic antibody.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anti-tumor antibody is directed against a specific cancer epitope, or combination of epitopes, that allows the targeting or depletion of cancer cell populations expressing said antigen.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody directed against a tumor antigen and/or the agonistic antibody is a monoclonal antibody.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the agonistic antibody is a xenogeneic human antibody.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the agonistic antibody is a humanized antibody.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the agonistic antibody is a chimeric antibody.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising a step of determining the level of the inducible costimulatory molecules.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the level of the inducible costimulatory molecules is determined prior to administering an antibody directed against a tumor antigen, and the increase in expression following administration of the antibody directed against a tumor antigen is determined.

16. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of determining comprises:

providing a patient sample; and

determining the level in the sample.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the patient sample is a patient blood sample or cellular fraction thereof.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the inducible costimulatory molecule is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein the inducible costimulatory molecule is a member of the CD28 family.

20. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tumor is a B cell malignancy.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein the B cell malignancy is marginal zone lymphoma, Hodgkins lymphoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, myelogenous leukemia, or chemotherapy-resistant hairy cell leukemia.

22. The method of claim 20 , wherein the B cell malignancy is a CD20-positive tumor and the antibody directed against a tumor antigen is specific for CD20.

23. The method of claim 22 , wherein the antibody specific for CD20 is Rituximab, Tositumomab, or Ibritumomab.

24. The method of claim 20 , wherein the B cell malignancy is a CD52-positive B cell malignancy and the antibody directed against a tumor antigen is specific for CD52.

25. The method of claim 22 , wherein the antibody specific for CD52 is Alemtuzumab.

26. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tumor is a solid tumor.

27. The method of claim 26 , wherein the solid tumor is a breast carcinoma, a squamous cell carcinoma, a colon cancer, a head and neck cancer, a lung cancer, a genitourinary cancer, a rectal cancer, a gastric cancer, or an esophageal cancer.

28. The method of claim 26 , wherein the solid tumor is a HER2-positive tumor and the antibody selective for a cancer cell antigen is specific for HER2.

29. The method of claim 28 , wherein the antibody specific for HER2 is Trastuzumab.

30. The method of claim 26 , wherein the solid tumor is an EGFR-positive tumor and the antibody selective for a cancer cell antigen is specific for EGFR.

31. The method of claim 30 , wherein the antibody specific for EGFR is Cetuximab.

32. The method of claim 26 , wherein the solid tumor is a 17-1A antigen-positive solid tumor and the antibody selective for a cancer cell antigen is specific for 17-1A antigen.

33. The method of claim 32 , wherein the antibody selective for 17-1A antigen is Edrecolomab.

34. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tumor is a CD19-positive tumor and the antibody selective for a cancer cell antigen is specific for CD19.

35. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tumor is a CD22-positive tumor and the antibody selective for a cancer cell antigen is specific for CD22.

36. In a method of treating cancer that comprises a step of administering anti-tumor antibody therapy, the improvement comprising:

a period of time after the step of administering anti-tumor antibody therapy (the “first administering step”), performing a second administering step that comprises administering a composition comprising an agonistic antibody that targets a molecule whose expression increases on surfaces of effector NK cells that mediate antibody-dependent-cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) when such cells are exposed to tumor cells bound by the anti-tumor antibody (an “inducible costimulatory molecule”), the period of time being sufficient so that expression of the inducible costimulatory molecule has been increased on such surfaces at the time of the second administering step, so that ADCC is increased.

37. A method of enhancing the anti-tumor effect of an antibody directed against a tumor antigen in a patient, the method comprising sequential administration of the anti-tumor antibody and an agonistic antibody, the agonistic antibody targeting at least one molecule on NK cells characterized in that its expression is induced on surfaces of NK cells during activation of the NK cells when such cells are exposed to tumor cells bound by an anti-tumor antibody (the “inducible costimulatory molecule”);

the agonistic antibody being characterized as agonistic in that, when the NK cells with the inducible costimulatory molecule on their surface are contacted with the agonistic antibody, their ADCC is increased as compared with that observed absent such contact; and

the agonistic antibody being administered a period of time after the administration of the anti-tumor antibody, the period of time being sufficiently long that increased expression of the inducible costimulatory molecule has occurred.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jun 22, 2016
From: STANFORD UNIVERSITY
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 039114/0867 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2012
From: KOHRT, HOLBROOK; LEVY, RONALD; ALIZADEH, ARASH ASH; GOLDSTEIN, MATTHEW J.; TORCHIA, JAMES; HOUOT, ROCH
To: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 028822/0749 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 61267337 · Dec 7, 2009
Provisional Application 61287067 · Dec 16, 2009
Provisional Application 61358303 · Jun 24, 2010
Related Publication 20120321646A1 · Dec 20, 2012