IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,852,267
Granted Patent B2
US 9,852,267 · App. 13/631,112 · Granted Dec 26, 2017

System and method for personalized dosing of pharmacologic agents

Inventors: Adam E. Gaweda (Jeffersonville, IN); Michael E. Brier (New Albany, IN); George R. Aronoff (Louisville, KY); Alfred A. Jacobs (Louisville, KY)
Assignee: University of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc.
G06F19/3437G06F19/345G06F19/3456
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,852,267
App. No.
13/631,112
Granted
Dec 26, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for personalized dosing of a pharmacologic agent include: executing, using a processing device, a plurality of dosing regimen program modules to determine a respective plurality of dose sets in response to receiving, from an input device, a target response value for a patient; and executing, using the processing device, a dosing selection algorithm module, following executing the plurality of dosing regimen program modules and in response to receiving from the input device a response profile and a monitoring frequency of the patient, to determine a recommended dose set computed as a combination of the plurality of dose sets weighted by degrees of matching computed using fuzzy sets and the response profile.

Claims (281)

1. A method for treating anemia in a subject using erythropoietic stimulating agents (Epo), comprising:

obtaining a target hemoglobin value (Hb target ), a current hemoglobin value (Hb k ), a rate of change of hemoglobin value (ΔHb k ), and an Epo dose received value (Epo k ) related to an amount of Epo being received by the subject;

determining an initial recommended Epo dose (Epo k+1,i *) for each of i dosing regimens based on the target hemoglobin value (Hb target ), the current hemoglobin value (Hb k ), the rate of change of hemoglobin value (ΔHb k ), and the previous Epo dose prescribed value (Epo k );

determining a next recommended Epo dose (Epo k+1 ) based on the initial recommended Epo doses for the i dosing regimens weighted by degrees of matching computed using fuzzy membership functions;

determining, using a dose-response model, a Hb k+1 value and a predicted hemoglobin response value (ΔHb k+1 ) for a subject with a respective Epo sensitivity profile based on the Hb k value, the ΔHb k value, and a proposed Epo k+1 value;

determining, using an optimization algorithm, the Epo k+1,i * value by determining the proposed Epo k+1 value using the Hb target value, the Epo k value, the Hb k+1 value and the ΔHb k+1 value, and then iteratively re-determining the proposed Epo k+1 value until the proposed Epo k+1 values converge to the Epo k+1,i * value; and

administering the next recommended Epo dose to the subject;

wherein the dose-response model is substantially according to the function:

[

dHb

dt

d

⁢

⁢

Δ

⁢

⁢

Hb

dt

]

=

[

-

2

T

i

1

T

i

2

1

0

]

⁡

[

Hb

Δ

⁢

⁢

Hb

]

+

[

K

i

T

i

2

0

]

⁢

Epo

where:

K i —erythropoietic response (1,000 Units Epo per 1 g/dL Hb change)

T i —time constant

Epo—dose (1,000 Units)

Hb—hemoglobin level (g/dL)

ΔHb—hemoglobin rate of change (g/dL per day); and

wherein the optimization algorithm is substantially according to the function:

OFV

=

∑

k

p

=

1

H

p

⁢

(

Hb

target

-

Hb

k

p

)

2

+

λ

i

⁢

∑

k

c

=

1

H

c

⁢

Δ

⁢

⁢

Epo

k

c

2

where:

k p , k c —time steps (weeks)

H p —prediction horizon (weeks)

H c —control horizon (weeks)

λ i —dose change suppression (non-dimensional)

Hb kp —hemoglobin at step k p

ΔEpo kc —change in dose from step k c-1 to k c ;

Subject to constraints:

0≦Epo≦90,000 units per week

0≦Hb≦20 g/dL

−0.5<ΔHb<0.5 g/dL per week

where: ΔHb=Hb kp −Hb kp-1 .

2. A method for treating anemia in a subject using erythropoietic stimulating agents (Epo), comprising:

obtaining a target hemoglobin value (Hb target ), a current hemoglobin value (Hb k ), a rate of change of hemoglobin value (ΔHb k ), and an Epo dose received value (Epo k ) related to an amount of Epo being received by the subject;

determining an initial recommended Epo dose (Epo k+1,i *) for each of i dosing regimens based on the target hemoglobin value (Hb target ), the current hemoglobin value (Hb k ), the rate of change of hemoglobin value (ΔHb k ), and the previous Epo dose prescribed value (Epo k );

determining a next recommended Epo dose (Epo k+1 ) based on the initial recommended Epo doses for the i dosing regimens weighted by degrees of matching computed using fuzzy membership functions;

determining, using a dose-response model, a Hb k+1 value and a predicted hemoglobin response value (ΔHb k+1 ) for a subject with a respective Epo sensitivity profile based on the Hb k value, the ΔHb k value, and a proposed Epo k+1 value; and

determining, using an optimization algorithm, the Epo k+1,i * value by determining the proposed Epo k+1 value using the Hb target value, the Epo k value, the Hb k+1 value and the ΔHb k+1 value, and then iteratively re-determining the proposed Epo k+1 value until the proposed Epo k+1 values converge to the Epo k+1,i * value; and

administering the next recommended Epo dose to the subject;

wherein “i” equals 5 such that there are 5 dosing regimens; and

wherein Epo k+1 is determined substantially according to the equation:

Epo

k

+

1

=

w

R

⁢

⁢

1

⁢

Epo

k

+

1

,

1

*

+

w

R

⁢

⁢

2

⁢

Epo

k

+

1

,

2

*

+

w

R

⁢

⁢

3

⁢

Epo

k

+

1

,

3

*

+

w

R

⁢

⁢

4

⁢

Epo

k

+

1

,

4

*

+

w

R

⁢

⁢

5

⁢

Epo

k

+

1

,

5

*

w

R

⁢

⁢

1

+

w

R

⁢

⁢

2

+

w

R

⁢

⁢

3

+

w

R

⁢

⁢

4

+

w

R

⁢

⁢

5

where:

w R1 =f MF (Epo k , μ 1 , s 1l , s 1r ) μ 1 =0 s 1l =1.0 s 1r =0.9*(Hb target −Hb 0 )

w R2 =f MF (Epo k , μ 2 , s 2l , s 2r ) μ 2 =3*(Hb target −Hb 0 ) s 2l =s 1r s 2r =1.35*(Hb target −Hb 0 )

w R3 =f MF (Epo k , μ 3 , s 3l , s 3r ) μ 3 =7.5*(Hb target −Hb 0 ) s 3l =s 2r s 3r =2.25*(Hb target −Hb 0 )

w R4 =f MF (Epo k , μ 4 , s 4l , s 4r ) μ 4 =15*(Hb target −Hb 0 ) s 4l =s 3r s 4r =s 4l

w R5 =f MF (Epo k , μ 5 , s 5l , s 5r ) μ 5 =22.5*(Hb target −Hb 0 ) s 5l =s 4r s 5r =100.0 and

where f MF is a fuzzy membership function substantially according to the equation:

f

MF

⁡

(

x

,

μ

,

s

l

,

s

r

)

=

{

exp

(

-

(

x

-

μ

)

2

s

l

2

)

x

<

μ

1

x

=

μ

exp

(

-

(

x

-

μ

)

2

s

r

2

)

x

>

μ

.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2012
From: GAWEDA, ADAM E.; BRIER, MICHAEL E.; ARONOFF, GEORGE R.; JACOBS, ALFRED A.
To: UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 029111/0149 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61541489 · Sep 30, 2011
Related Publication 20130085772A1 · Apr 4, 2013