IP Library Granted Patent US 9,086,025
Granted Patent B2
US 9,086,025 · App. 13/646,891 · Granted Jul 21, 2015

Systems and methods for correcting mass airflow sensor drift

Inventors: Ashwin Vyas (Columbus, IN); Vivek A. Sujan (Columbus, IN); Andrew W. Osburn (Nashville, IN); Abdul Ofoli (Columbus, IN); Govindarajan Kothandaraman (Columbus, IN); Karim Azizou (Greenwood, IN)
Assignee: Cummins Inc.
F02D41/0002F02D41/18F02D41/2474F02D41/222
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,086,025
App. No.
13/646,891
Granted
Jul 21, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for correcting mass airflow sensor drift include an operation conditions module to interpret a base calibration function, a MAF sensor input value, and a current operating condition. A MAF correction module determines an expected MAF value in response to the current operating condition and a predetermined operating condition. The MAF correction module will also determine an adjusted MAF value in response to the expected MAF value, the base calibration function, and the MAF sensor input value. A MAF reporting module is structured to provide the adjusted MAF value.

Claims (52)

1. A system, comprising:

an internal combustion engine having an air intake assembly;

a mass airflow (MAF) sensor operably coupled to the air intake assembly; and

a controller operably connected to the internal combustion engine and the MAF sensor, the controller comprising:

an operation conditions module structured to interpret a base calibration function of the MAF sensor, a MAF sensor input value, and a current operating condition of the internal combustion engine;

a MAF correction module structured to determine an expected MAF value in response to the current operating condition and a predetermined operating condition;

an error margin module structured to interpret a threshold MAF sensor difference and to determine a MAF sensor difference in response to the expected MAF value and the MAF sensor input value;

wherein the MAF correction module is structured to determine an adjusted MAF value in response to the expected MAF value, the base calibration function, the threshold MAF sensor difference, and the MAF sensor input value, wherein the adjusted MAF value is based on a local adjustment of the base calibration function in response to the MAF sensor difference being less than the threshold MAF sensor difference and the adjusted MAF value is based on a global shift of the base calibration function in response to the MAF sensor difference being greater than the threshold MAF sensor difference; and

a MAF reporting module structured to provide the adjusted MAF value.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the internal combustion engine is a diesel engine having an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) inlet operably coupled to the air intake assembly downstream of the MAF sensor.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the MAF sensor is one of a hot-film MAF sensor and a hot-wire MAF sensor.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the air intake assembly includes a turbocharger having a compressor inlet and, wherein the MAF sensor is positioned upstream of the compressor inlet.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the threshold MAF sensor difference comprises at least 5% of the expected MAF value.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the threshold MAF sensor difference comprises at least 20% of the expected MAF value.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the threshold MAF sensor difference comprises a value between 5% and 35% of the expected MAF value.

8. An apparatus, comprising:

an operation conditions module structured to interpret a base calibration function, a MAF sensor input value, and a current operating condition;

a MAF correction module structured to determine an expected MAF value in response to the current operating condition and a predetermined operating condition, and determine an adjusted MAF value in response to the expected MAF value, the base calibration function, and the MAF sensor input value, the MAF correction module further being structured to provide a global shift of the base calibration function when the MAF sensor input differs from the expected MAF value by more than a predetermined threshold, and the MAF correction module is further structured to provide a local adjustment of the base calibration function in response to the MAF sensor input differing from the expected MAF value by less than the predetermined threshold, wherein the adjusted MAF value is based on at least one of the globally shifted base calibration function and the locally adjusted base calibration function; and

a MAF reporting module structured to provide the adjusted MAF value.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the expected MAF value defines an expected MAF function.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein a log plotted slope of a number of MAF sensor input values differs from a log plotted slope of the expected MAF function and a log plotted slope of the base calibration function.

11. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the base calibration function and the expected MAF function are exponential functions.

12. The apparatus of claim 8 , further comprising an error margin module structured to interpret a threshold MAF sensor difference and to determine a MAF sensor difference in response to the expected MAF value and the MAF sensor input value, and wherein the MAF reporting module is further structured to provide the adjusted MAF value in response to the MAF sensor difference exceeding the threshold MAF sensor difference.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the threshold MAF sensor difference is a function of the current operating condition.

14. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the threshold MAF sensor difference has a range of 5% to 35% of the expected MAF value.

15. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the threshold MAF sensor difference has a range of 5% to 50% of the expected MAF value.

16. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the threshold MAF sensor difference has a range of 5% to 100% of the expected MAF value.

17. A method, comprising:

interpreting a base calibration function, a MAF sensor input value, and a current operating condition;

determining an expected MAF value in response to the current operating condition and a predetermined operating condition;

interpreting a threshold MAF sensor difference;

determining a MAF sensor difference in response to the expected MAF value and the MAF sensor input value;

in response to the MAF sensor difference exceeding the threshold sensor difference, globally shifting the base calibration function, and in response to the MAF sensor difference being less than the threshold MAF sensor difference, determining a local adjustment for the MAF sensor input value;

determining an adjusted MAF value in response to the expected MAF value, one of the globally shifted base calibration function and the local adjustment, and the MAF sensor input value; and

providing the adjusted MAF value.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the interpreting the threshold MAF sensor difference is in response to the current operating condition.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the interpreting the current operating condition further comprises interpreting an engine speed and an engine load.

20. The method of claim 17 , further comprising operating an internal combustion engine in response to the adjusted MAF value.

21. The method of claim 17 , further comprising setting a fault value in response to the adjusted MAF value.

22. The method of claim 17 , further comprising setting a fault value in response to the MAF sensor difference.

23. A method, comprising:

providing an internal combustion engine having an air intake assembly, the air intake assembly having a MAF sensor operably coupled thereto;

operating the internal combustion engine at one of a plurality of predetermined operating conditions;

interpreting a current MAF sensor function and a MAF sensor input value;

determining an expected MAF sensor value;

interpreting a threshold MAF sensor difference;

determining a MAF sensor difference in response to the expected MAF sensor value and the MAF sensor input value; and

in response to the MAF sensor difference exceeding the threshold MAF sensor difference, globally shifting the current MAF sensor function, and in response to the MAF sensor difference being less than the threshold MAF sensor difference, locally adjusting the current MAF sensor function, and determining an adjusted MAF value in response to one of the globally shifted MAF function and the adjusted MAF function, the MAF sensor input value, and the expected MAF sensor value.

24. The method of claim 23 , further comprising determining an expected MAF function in response to the expected MAF sensor value, and further adjusting the correction factor of the MAF sensor in response to the expected MAF function.

25. The method of claim 23 , wherein interpreting the MAF sensor input value further comprises interpreting a relationship between a temperature change value and a mass airflow value.

26. The method of claim 23 , wherein the interpreting the threshold MAF sensor difference further comprises interpreting the threshold MAF sensor difference in response to the one of the plurality of predetermined operating conditions.

27. The method of claim 23 , wherein the operating the internal combustion engine at one of the plurality of predetermined operating conditions further comprises operating the internal combustion over a range of operating conditions, where the range of operating conditions further includes the one of the number of predetermined operating conditions.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Feb 20, 2019
From: CUMMINS, INC. D/B/A CUMMINS TECHNICAL CENTER
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 049867/0197 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2014
From: OFOLI, ABDUL
To: CUMMINS INC.
Reel/Frame 033618/0169 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 4, 2014
From: VYAS, ASHWIN; SUJAN, VIVEK A.; OSBURN, ANDREW W.; KOTHANDARAMAN, GOVINDARAJAN; AZIZOU, KARIM
To: CUMMINS INC.
Reel/Frame 033455/0717 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61562132 · Nov 21, 2011
Related Publication 20130131955A1 · May 23, 2013