IP Library Granted Patent US 10,294,266
Granted Patent B2
US 10,294,266 · App. 13/694,010 · Granted May 21, 2019

Engineering surface epitopes to improve protein crystallization

Inventors: Victor Naumov (New York, NY); William Nicholson Price (Barnesville, MD); Samuel K. Handelman (Columbus, OH); John Frances Hunt (New York, NY)
Assignee: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
C07K1/107C07K14/47G06F19/18C07K2299/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,294,266
App. No.
13/694,010
Granted
May 21, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention provides for methods and systems for engineering target proteins, based on protein sequence characteristics that influence the likelihood of obtaining a crystal suitable for X-ray structure solution, to improve protein crystallization, as well as related material.

Claims (34)

1. A method for increasing the number of high-quality crystal-packing motifs in a target protein to improve its crystallization properties, comprising:

a. providing a sub-epitope library containing local crystal-packing motifs in the PDB that span at most two-successive regular secondary structural elements and flanking loops, wherein each sub-epitope is ranked by p-value according to its overrepresentation in crystal-packing interfaces formed by crystal structures in the PDB that do not have excessively close inter-protein contacts;

b. identifying one or more specific candidate sites in the sequence of the target protein for introduction of each sub-epitope in the library by:

i. using a computer program to search a protein sequence database for proteins homologous to the target protein;

ii. using a computer program to perform a multiple sequence alignment of the target sequence with the homologous proteins identified by the search program;

iii. using a computer program to predict the secondary structure of the target protein based on its sequence; and

iv. specifying exact sites in the target protein for introduction of a sub-epitope from the library based on the occurrence of residues similar to those in the sub-epitope at aligned positions in one of the homologous protein sequences and on conservation of the secondary structure of the sub-epitope in the target protein; and

c. prioritizing sub-epitopes for introduction via mutagenesis at the specific sites identified for that sub-epitope in the target protein based on the overrepresentation p-value of the sub-epitope in crystal-packing interfaces; and

d. further prioritizing sub-epitopes for introduction via mutagenesis at the specific sites identified for that sub-epitope in the target protein based on whether the number of sub-epitopes of equal or better overrepresentation p-value is increased by the required mutations in the target sequence; and

e. obtaining a mutant protein sequence of the target protein based on the sub-epitope prioritization steps and wherein the mutant protein sequence is expressed in an expression system.

2. The method of claim 1 in which the sub-epitope library comprises the sequences in tables 1-38.

3. The method of claim 1 , in which the candidate sub-epitopes for substitution at the candidate sites is selected from tables 8 or 12.

4. A method for increasing the number of high-quality crystal-packing motifs in a target protein to improve its crystallization properties comprising:

a. providing a sub-epitope library containing local crystal-packing motifs in the PDB that span at most two-successive regular secondary structural elements and flanking loops, wherein each sub-epitope is ranked by p-value according to its overrepresentation in crystal-packing interfaces formed by crystal structures in the PDB that do not have excessively close inter-protein contacts;

b. identifying one or more specific candidate sites in the sequence of the target protein for introduction of each sub-epitope in the library by:

i. using a computer program to search a protein sequence database for proteins homologous to the target protein;

ii. using a computer program to perform a multiple sequence alignment of the target sequence with the homologous proteins identified by the search program;

iii. using a computer program to predict the secondary structure of the target protein based on its sequence; and

iv. specifying exact sites in the target protein for introduction of a sub-epitope from the library based on the occurrence of residues similar to those in the sub-epitope at aligned positions in one of the homologous protein sequences and on conservation of the secondary structure of the sub-epitope in the target protein; and

c. prioritizing sub-epitopes for introduction via mutagenesis at the specific sites identified for that sub-epitope in the target protein based on the overrepresentation p-value of the sub-epitope in crystal-packing interfaces; and

d. further prioritizing sub-epitopes for introduction via mutagenesis at the specific sites identified for that sub-epitope in the target protein based on whether the number of sub-epitopes of equal or better overrepresentation p-value is increased by the required mutations in the target sequence; and

e. obtaining a mutant protein sequence of the target protein based on the sub-epitope prioritization steps and wherein the mutant protein sequence is expressed in an expression system, and the expressed protein is crystallized and its structure is determined with high-resolution X-ray crystallography.

5. A method for increasing the number of high-quality crystal-packing motifs in a target protein to improve its crystallization properties, comprising

a. providing a sub-epitope library containing local crystal-packing motifs in the PDB that span at most two-successive regular secondary structural elements and flanking loops, wherein each sub-epitope is ranked by p-value according to its overrepresentation in crystal-packing interfaces formed by crystal structures in the PDB that do not have excessively close inter-protein contacts;

b. identifying one or more specific candidate sites in the sequence of the target protein for introduction of each sub-epitope in the library by:

i. using a computer program to search a protein sequence database for proteins homologous to the target protein;

ii. using a computer program to perform a multiple sequence alignment of the target sequence with the homologous proteins identified by the search program;

iii. using a computer program to predict the secondary structure of the target protein based on its sequence; and

iv. specifying exact sites in the target protein for introduction of a sub-epitope from the library based on the occurrence of residues similar to those in the sub-epitope at aligned positions in one of the homologous protein sequences and on conservation of the secondary structure of the sub-epitope in the target protein; and

c. prioritizing sub-epitopes for introduction via mutagenesis at the specific sites identified for that sub-epitope in the target protein based on the overrepresentation p-value of the sub-epitope in crystal-packing interfaces; and

d. further prioritizing sub-epitopes for introduction via mutagenesis at the specific sites identified for that sub-epitope in the target protein based on whether the number of sub-epitopes of equal or better overrepresentation p-value is increased by the required mutations in the target sequence; and

e. obtaining a mutant protein sequence of the target protein based on the sub-epitope prioritization steps and wherein the mutant protein sequence is expressed in an expression system to provide a mutant protein with the mutant protein sequence and is crystallized and its structure is determined with high-resolution X-ray crystallography.

6. The method of claim 5 , in which the sub-epitope library comprises the sequences in tables 1-38.

7. The method of claim 5 , in which the candidate sub-epitopes for substitution at the candidate sites is selected from tables 8 or 12.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Oct 4, 2017
From: COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 044120/0587 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Oct 6, 2016
From: COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 040241/0746 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part PCTUS2011033135 · Apr 19, 2011
Provisional Application 61325723 · Apr 19, 2010
Provisional Application 61432901 · Jan 14, 2011
Related Publication 20130123467A1 · May 16, 2013