IP Library Granted Patent US 8,535,631
Granted Patent B2
US 8,535,631 · App. 13/696,757 · Granted Sep 17, 2013

Method for the catalytic removal of carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide from exhaust gases

Inventor: Alain Strickroth (Esch/Alzette, LU)
Assignee: CPPE Carbon Process & Plant Engineering S.A.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,535,631
App. No.
13/696,757
Granted
Sep 17, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for the catalytic removal of sulphur dioxide and carbon dioxide from waste gases in a reactor charged with an activated carbon catalyst, includes saturating the activated carbon with SO 2 , saturating or partially saturating waste gases with water, introducing the waste gases with water, introducing the exhaust gases into the reactor catal ticall convertin the SO 2 into H 2 SO 4 and CO 2 into C and O 2 and into sulphur-carbon compounds on the same catalyst, washing out the catalyst and discharging the H 2 SO 4 as a liquid and the C as a solid and/or bound to sulphur compounds.

Claims (14)

1. Method for the catalytic removal of sulphur dioxide and carbon dioxide from waste gases in a reactor charged with an activated carbon catalyst, characterised by the following steps:

saturating the activated carbon with SO 2 ,

saturating or partially saturating the waste gases with water,

introducing the exhaust gases into the reactor,

catalytically converting the SO 2 into H 2 SO 4 and, in parallel with this, catalytically converting CO 2 into C and O 2 and into sulphur-carbon compounds on the same catalyst,

washing out the catalyst and discharging the H 2 SO 4 as a liquid and the C as a solid or/and bound to sulphur compounds.

2. Method according to claim 1 , characterised in that the ratio of SO 2 and CO 2 in the waste gases is between 0.25 and 0.58 mol/mol.

3. Method according to claim 1 , characterised in that the inlet temperature of the waste gases lies between the ambient temperature and 150° C.

4. Method according to claim 1 , characterised in that the O 2 content of the waste gases is at least 5% by volume.

5. The method according to claim 1 , characterised in that the O 2 content is more than 8 times greater than the SO 2 content.

6. Method according to claim 1 , characterised in that the waste gases are saturated with water by quenching.

7. Method according to claim 1 , characterised in that softened or demineralised water is used to wash out the catalyst.

8. Method according to claim 1 , characterised in that the catalyst is washed out in co-current flow with or in counterflow to the waste gases.

9. Method according to claim 1 , characterised in that the SO 2 purifying factor of the catalyst is between 0.4 and 0.6.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 25, 2015
From: CPPE CARBON PROCESS & PLANT ENGINEERING S.A.; AJO INDUSTRIES SARL
To: BANQUE INTERNATIONALE A LUXEMBOURG S.A.; WGZ BANK AG WESTDEUTSCHE GENOSSENSCHAFTS-ZENTRALBANK; BGL BNP PARIBAS
Reel/Frame 036027/0249 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 5, 2014
From: CPPE CARBON PROCESS & PLANT ENGINEERING S.A.
To: AJO INDUSTRIES SARL; BANQUE INTERNATIONALE A LUXEMBOURG S.A.; WGZ BANK AG WESTDEUTSCHE GENOSSENSCHAFTS-ZENTRALBANK; BGL BNP PARIBAS
Reel/Frame 033471/0747 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 8, 2013
From: STRICKROTH, ALAIN
To: CPPE CARBON PROCESS & PLANT ENGINEERING S.A.
Reel/Frame 029589/0342 →
Priority Claims (1)
LU 91685 · May 7, 2010 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20130108533A1 · May 2, 2013