IP Library Patent Application 13709406
Patent Application
App. No. 13/709,406

METHOD FOR MONITORING THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS OF HOT-MANUFACTURED TUBES MADE FROM STEEL

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
13/709,406
Abstract

A method for monitoring the manufacturing process of hot-rolled tubes in which the type and dimensional characteristics of structures produced by the rolling process on an outer surface of the tube are evaluated to assess the process state. Immediately subsequent to the rolling process in the exit side region of a rolling stand the outer surface of at least one defined portion of the tube is detected by measuring technology, linearly by means of an optical laser stripe method and in a clocked manner in the form of profile lines, and the profile lines are then combined to form an at least two-dimensional topography and the topography is evaluated to assess the process state.

Claims (18)

1 . A method for monitoring the manufacturing process of hot-rolled steel tubes in which the type and dimensional characteristics of structures produced by the rolling process on an outer surface of the tube are evaluated to assess the process state, said method comprising:

detecting the outer surface of at least one defined portion of the tube immediately subsequent to the rolling process in the exit side region of a rolling stand linearly by an optical laser stripe in a clocked manner in the form of profile lines;

combining the profile lines to form an at least two-dimensional topography; and

evaluating the topography to assess the process state.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the hot-rolled steel tubes are produced by a hot Pilger process.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the topography of the outer surfaces is detected in an automated manner.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the outer surface of the tube is detected in a spatially-resolved and time-resolved manner, and wherein the topography composed there from is compared with a reference image of an already rolled tube, serving as a reference body, of the same steel grade class and same nominal dimensions of the same measurement location in each case and is evaluated to assess the process state.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein any structures arising on the surface of the tube are determined from a topography of the tube at a specific measurement location, and wherein the determined structures are compared with structures of a topography of the reference body for the same measurement location and a significant deviation between the structures is evaluated to assess the process state.

6 . The method of claim 5 , further including detecting the wall thickness on the rolled tube, determining the topography of the inner surface of the tube, and evaluating the inner surface topography to assess the process state.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein from a plurality of the topographies on the outer and/or inner surface, which are determined with the aid of reference bodies of the same steel grade class and nominal dimensions, a tolerance range for deviations is established, a signal being triggered if the boundaries of the tolerance range are exceeded.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the signal is assigned to the measurement location on the tube and a reference to an event in the manufacturing process leading to the tolerance boundaries being exceeded is produced.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the assignment of signal and event, which is determined in each case for the rolled tube, is stored in a database for each reference body of the same steel grade class and nominal dimensions, and, if the tolerance boundaries are exceeded at a certain measurement location, the event leading to the tolerance boundaries being exceeded is indicated and used as a control variable for the manufacturing process.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the outer surface of the tube is detected in a spatially-resolved and time-resolved manner, and wherein the topography composed there from is compared with a reference image of an already rolled tube, serving as a reference body, of the same steel grade class and same nominal dimensions of the same measurement location in each case and is evaluated to assess the process state.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein any structures arising on the surface of the tube are determined from a topography of the tube at a specific measurement location, and wherein the determined structures are compared with structures of a topography of the reference body for the same measurement location and a significant deviation between the structures is evaluated to assess the process state.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further including detecting the wall thickness on the rolled tube, determining the topography of the inner surface of the tube, and evaluating the inner surface topography to assess the process state.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein from a plurality of the topographies on the outer surface, which are determined with the aid of reference bodies of the same steel grade class and nominal dimensions, a tolerance range for deviations is established, a signal being triggered if the boundaries of the tolerance range are exceeded.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the signal is assigned to the measurement location on the tube and a reference to an event in the manufacturing process leading to the tolerance boundaries being exceeded is produced.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the assignment of signal and event, which is determined in each case for the rolled tube, is stored in a database for each reference body of the same steel grade class and nominal dimensions, and, if the tolerance boundaries are exceeded at a certain measurement location, the event leading to the tolerance boundaries being exceeded is indicated and used as a control variable for the manufacturing process.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 31, 2014
From: V&M DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
To: VALLOUREC DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
Reel/Frame 033453/0871 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 10, 2012
From: DEPPE, GERD-JOACHIM; MARK VAN DER LOGT
To: V & M DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
Reel/Frame 029436/0560 →